开盘后涨幅超15倍,比特币链游Bitcoin Cats有何魅力?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-12-21Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-21

Анотація

Launchpad持续两个小时,有37,383 枚ETH 、 7300 万枚BAKE参与,总价值达1.06亿美元

在不断的见顶声中,比特币生态又给了社区一点小小的震撼。

12 月 19 日,AMM NFT 交易平台 BakerySwap 进行了首次 Launchpad,在其上进行 IDO 的项目为比特币链游项目 Bitcoin Cats,首轮将释放 20 亿枚$ 1 Cat,每个参与者的限额为 2 ETH,白名单成员有资格获得双倍分配。Launchpad 持续两个小时,据悉,有 37, 383 枚 ETH、 7300 万枚 BAKE 参与,参与代币总价值达 1.06 亿美元,超额认购了 150 倍。

开盘后涨幅超15倍,比特币链游Bitcoin Cats有何魅力?

12 月 20 日下午 4 时,$ 1 Cat 上线 uniswap、bakeryswap 交易所,在开盘后涨幅超 15 倍,截至撰稿时为 0.007 U。比巨额募金和涨幅更让社区惊讶的,是其 IDO 平台 BakerySwap 借着首次 Launchpad 成为了市场聚焦的中心,其代币 BAKE 在今日有了 64% 的涨幅。

Bitcoin Cats :比特币生态+GameFi+NFT

根据官网介绍,BitcoinCats 的定位是比特币生态系统的 GameFi 平台。通过将比特币资产(BRC 20、Ordinals NFT 等)映射到以太坊(和其他 Layer 2)网络,为比特币资产带来包括但不限于 Play 2 Earn、质押、耕种、SocialFi 等新玩法。

此次开盘半小时涨幅超 10 倍的代币 1 Cat 是 Bitcoin Cats 游戏生态系统的原生代币,总供应量为 100 亿,本次发行中释放了 20 亿枚。据官网介绍, 1 Cat 可用于购买和升级游戏内资产,包括头像、宠物、设备、农田等。它还可以承担门票的功能,使玩家能够访问游戏的特殊功能。

此外, 1 Cat 在作为游戏生态系统的实用代币的同时,「也是一个 meme 币,以一只超级可爱的猫作为它的标志。」

1 Cat 是 BRC 20 代币、同时也是 ERC 20 代币。团队解释称「它最初刻在比特币上,其中一部分被桥接/包装到以太坊」。在此次 Lanchpad 中,团队将 BRC 20 和 ERC 20 1 cat 代币混合分发给 了 BRC 20 地址中分配量较大的参与者,而其他人仅收到 ERC 20 代币。团队做出的解释是「由于 1 cat 即将在多家中心化交易所上市,无需担心 BRC 20 和 ERC 20 代币之间的价格差异。」

按照这个设定,如果 Bitcoin Cats 真的能实现其构想的话,在游戏内资产流动方面有许多障碍需要克服。依赖于近期发展起来的比特币跨链协议和 DEX 协议,BRC 20 和 ERC 20 已经可实现互换交易,但距应用到游戏生态还有一些距离。此外,既是生态治理代币、又是 meme 币, 1 cat 代币价值要如何稳定的发展,也是团队在设计游戏时需要考虑到的问题。

除了代币以外,Bitcoin Cats 推出的资产还包括 Bitcoin Cats NFT,是刻在 Ordinals 上的 像素化卡通猫 NFT,总量为 10, 000 ,在 Bitcoin Cats 的官方网站上,已经提到了关于其 IP 生态系统的各种设想,涉及不同的媒体形式和产品领域,这包括了视频短片、游戏、AR&VR(增强现实和虚拟现实)、元宇宙以及玩具模型等。

目前,BitcoinCats NFT 还没有发售,可以通过质押 1 cats 代币的形式来获得 NFT 空投白名单资格。此外,官网提供了 BitcoinCats NFT 的图片下载渠道,使用 BitcoinCats NFT 图片作为社交媒体头像的用户也有机会获得 NFT 白名单的资格。

开盘后涨幅超15倍,比特币链游Bitcoin Cats有何魅力?

Bitcoincats 还没有放出有关游戏的具体信息,根据官网显示,游戏可能涉及对战、社交、耕种等玩法,其官方网站上线于 12 月 11 日。在 IDO 成功后,Bitcoin Cats 在在社交媒体上发布了「简短路线图」,首先是将开启质押 1 Cat 代币获得 NFT 白名单的活动,然后将推出 Bitcoin Cats 第一款游戏,将涉及 3D 元宇宙等元素,但并没有提到具体的时间。

开盘后涨幅超15倍,比特币链游Bitcoin Cats有何魅力?

除了 BakerySwap,BitcoinCats 还和专注于比特币生态的 IDO 平台 Turtsat 进行了合作,在 IDO 预热期间,Web3 社交平台 Port 3 Network、铭文市场 Ave.ai 等项目也宣布了与 BitcoinCats 的合作关系。

占位优势吃香,能否持续?

不得不说,「比特币生态上的第一个游戏平台」的叙事确实足够有吸引力,但是从项目本身而言,Bitcoin Cats 尚未充分向社区展示其做游戏的实力。目前看来,代币 1 Cats 与「游戏平台」的密切关联性似乎并不显著。社区也有人指出,BitcoinCats 的画风很像一款链游 Worldwide Webb,后者是一款 NFT 社区熟知的像素风元宇宙 mmorpg 游戏,曾获得千万融资。

可以确定的是,相比于游戏本身,市场看重的是比特币生态的叙事空间。Bitcoin Cats 作为比特币生态中的第一个游戏平台,其占位优势吸引了市场的青睐和投资者的 FOMO 情绪。但游戏不比铭文,项目还需要展示出真正的能力才能真正留住涌来的资金。

值得注意的是,Bitcoin Cats 和 BakerySwap 的双赢合作在比特币生态热潮中不是首例。宣布不接受任何投资、专为比特币生态项目进行 IDO 的平台 TurtSat,近 1 个月以来已经陆续为 5 个项目进行了 Launchpad,并表示有 20 多个项目还在 IDO 的路上,其代币 TURT 也在近一个月内实现了超 10 倍的涨幅。12 月 21 日,TurtSat 还宣布了与 DWF Labs 建立战略合作伙伴关系。

相关阅读《TurtSat:孵化出 10 倍涨幅$MUBI 的「BRC-20 实验」,专注 Ordinals 生态的 IDO 平台能走多远?

注意力容易被吸引,但共识不容易聚集。热潮之后,这些项目的表现将会如何,BlockBeats 将持续关注。

Пов'язані матеріали

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit18 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit18 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手24 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手24 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit59 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit59 хв тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片