Global Securities Regulator IOSCO Issues DeFi Policy Recommendations

CoinDeskPolicyОпубліковано о 2023-12-19Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-20

Анотація

Organizing as DAOs doesn't mean freedom from regulatory responsibilities, the International Organization of Securities Commissions says.

The standards setter for securities markets regulation worldwide has provided guidance for handling decentralized finance (DeFi) as its members, which represent some 130 jurisdictions, consider ways to supervise the industry.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), whose members regulate over 95% of the world's securities markets, published its policy recommendations for decentralized finance (DeFi) on Tuesday, just a month after it published recommendations for regulating crypto markets.

10

Regulators have struggled to tackle DeFi, which, in theory, lacks a central body that could be subject to supervision. But IOSCO, in a September report, told governments to find out who's responsible for innovative financial applications and regulate them as they would traditional finance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Given the similar economic functions and activities of DeFi and traditional financial markets, many existing international policies, standards, and jurisdictional regulatory frameworks are applicable to those DeFi activities and those mechanisms that govern them," the regulator said.

In cases where existing rules don't apply, they should be modified to do so, IOSCO said. The guidance on DeFI covers how to identify the people responsible, how to set clear disclosure requirements and how to enforce laws.

Responsible persons include anyone "exercising control or sufficient influence over a financial product offered, financial service provided, or financial activity engaged in (or over products, services, and activities that behave like, or have been substituted by investors for, financial products, services, and activities) by the DeFi arrangement."

Therefore, operating as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) rather than incorporating does not "abdicate these persons and entities of their regulatory responsibilities," IOSCO said. "Regardless of the labels, organizational forms, or technologies used, persons and entities who offer or provide financial products and services and engage in financial activities should be subject to applicable laws."

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit2 год тому

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片