WOO 2024年度展望:比特币将飙涨至75000美元

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-12-16Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-16

Анотація

2024年对于WOO来说是关键的一年。

WOO 2024年度展望:比特币将飙涨至75000美元

2023 年 12 月 14 日 - WOO 预测比特币将在 2024 年初上涨至 75, 000 美元。此看涨预测是根据 ETF 和比特币减半的共同发生,有望将比特币定位为一种稳健的避险资产。

针对此发展,WOO 共同创办人 Jack Tan 分享了他的见解:“众所期盼的 ETF 推出和即将到来的比特币减半,将大幅增加需求。这两个状况的结合,有望重塑传统投资者的看法,并可能让比特币被视为避险资产。”

在一份 17 页的年末回顾和 2024 年度展望报告中,WOO 强调机构参与、东方市场的乐观情绪,以及 DeFi 的成长动能,将是未来一年的关键发展。

WOO 的 2024 年度预测:

机构影响:退休基金和主权财富基金等主要投资者,正准备直接进行加密货币配置。我们预期芝商所的期货市场份额将飙涨,而在东亚地区(如韩国和日本)的推动下,散户参与度将出现复甦。而在监管的挑战之下,DeFi 的颠覆性力量将推动永续合约交易所,预计在 2024 年佔全球每日交易量的 30% 。

WOO X Global 的成长轨迹:WOO X Global 预测其以 DeFi 为中心的产品套件将大幅成长,尤其是中心化理财产品和质押平台。此外,更将著重于战略合作伙伴关係、扩大网路和产品创新,以提升流动性、用户参与度和整体绩效。

WOOFi 的扩展:WOOFi 即将开始扩展,尤其是 WOOFi Swap,以满足跨链交换和去中心化收益金库的需求。DeFi 的市场份额不断攀升,挑战著 CeFi 的主导地位,而 WOO 多元的 DeFi 套件在这个竞争激烈的环境中佔据了优势。

韩国、日本和新加坡等地区仍然维持严格且具有地方特色的政策,而香港已经推进了正式的牌照制度,这表明了北京对于此产业看法的转变。

2024 年对于 WOO 来说是关键的一年,因为它将在应对瞬息万变的加密货币领域的同时,期待著比特币的飙涨,并将自己定位于 DeFi 创新和机构採用的第一线。

请由此免费下载 WOO 2024 年度展望:https://blog.woo.org/content/files/2023/12/A-definitive-guide-to-WOO-in-2024-1.pdf

▲ 免责声明:以上内容提供之资料仅供参考,各项内容并非投资及交易策略建议,亦不构成任何产品或服务之要约、要约招揽或建议,仅作为知识性及学术性分享,任何人据此等资料而做出或改变投资操作之决策,须自行承担结果。文章资讯请依 WOO 官方媒体平台发佈为主。

▲ 本文内容已被翻译成不同地区语言并在多个平台共享。如因不同语言释义而导致不一致的内容,请以英文官方网站之版本为准。

Пов'язані матеріали

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit36 хв тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit36 хв тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit46 хв тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit46 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit57 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit57 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit1 год тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片