BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-11-08Востаннє оновлено о 2023-11-08

Анотація

“我要把BRC-20从世界上驱逐干净。”

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

昨日,币安宣布上线 BRC-20 代币 ORDI 的现货和合约交易。消息一出,ORDI 价格从 7.4 USDT 一度飙升突破 12 USDT,今日再次上行突破 14.5 USDT,暂回落至 13.6 USDT, 24 小时涨幅约 83% 。

不过,今日凌晨,Ordinals 协议创始人 Casey 于 X 平台发文表示,要求币安移除其在 ORDI 代币信息界面里指向 Ordinals 的一些链接,并强调 ORDI 与 Ordinals、The Open Ordinals Institute 或 The Ordicord 没有关联。

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

币安官网信息显示,ORDI“官网链接”指向 ordinals.com,“白皮书”指向 docs.ordinals.com,“区块链浏览器”指向 ordiscan。如下所示:

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

社区中部分对 Ordinals 和 ORDI 不了解的用户,误认为是 ORDI 官方不愿意上架币安要求下架代币,将其视为利空消息。

实际上,ORDI 代币的概念、推行与发展与 Ordinals 协议关联不强,并且 Casey 长期反对 BRC-20 。Odaily 将于本文揭示其概念之间的关系和故事。

概念解析

Ordinals

Ordinals 协议由软件工程师 Casey Rodarmor 提出, 2023 年 1 月 30 日正式在比特币主网上启动。该协议为每一个聪(比特币最小单位)定义了顺序,并使用隔离见证和 Taproot 技术,允许将内容“铭刻”至比特币网络上,并绑定至特定序号的 sats 上,使其能够转移和交易。铭刻的内容形式主要包括图片(image)、文本(text)、视频(video)和音频(audio)等。

BRC-20 

BRC-20 是由 Domo 于 2023 年 3 月 9 日提出的一种代币标准,基于 Ordinals 协议,将一段特定的文本(text)铭刻至区块链上,并将其“视为”一种代币。其标准格式如下:

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

简而言之,ORDI 是 BRC-20 的第一个代币,创建人为 Domo,而 BRC-20 使用了 Ordinals 协议,Ordinals 协议创始人才是 Casey,Casey 要求币安下架信息所表达的是意思是,不应该将“同名”代币与底层协议本身挂钩。

“我要把 BRC-20 从世界上驱逐干净“

Casey 长期以来反对 BRC-20 的存在,认为 BRC-20 产生“垃圾 UTXO”而占据比特币的空间。并且存在潜在的安全问题。

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

“垃圾”UTXO 论

9 月 1 日,Casey 表示:“圣诞节我想要的是让 Degen 们发现 Taproot Assets,这样他们就可以停止铸造 BRC-20 。”

9 月 24 日,耗时 6 个月,sats 铸造进度达 100% 。这一天 Casey 发文表示:“BRC-20 sats 代币有 2100 万张的代币限制,每次铸造限 1 张,该限制导致 2100 万笔交易,以及大量内存池拥塞,最终铸造完成。”(Odaily 注:sats 铭刻成本超 2100 万美元,需要 2100 万次铭刻)

尝试取而代之

9 月 26 日,Casey 提出了基于比特币网络的新协议,名为 Runes,作为对 BRC 20 的替代品。Rodarmor 表示,Runes 是以 UTXO 为基础的协议,更自然地适应比特币,并通过避免创建“垃圾 UTXO”来促进 UTXO 集合的最小化。

10 月 15 日,Casey 在 X 平台表示:“你们甚至无法理解 Runes 将给比特币带来的令人愉快的、手工的 shitcoining。” 一名社区用户在该推文下回复:“有人知道哪里可以阅读有关 Runes 的更多信息吗?如果是和 brc-20 类似的流程,他们的表现不会很好。”

Casey 回应:“您对 BRC-20 的流程有何不满?”(即旨在针对 BRC-20 进行改进)。

BTC生态 | 揭秘Ordinals创始人要求币安移除ORDI幕后故事

(补充阅读:《取代 BRC-20 激活 BTC 生态?Ordinals 创始人带来新协议 Runes》)

安全问题

9 月 23 日,Casey 提出,攻击者可以通过铸造“转账铭文”并发送至受害人地址,以锁定其地址余额。

11 月 4 日,BRC-20 创始人 Domo 发布安全性改进提案,新增 fraction 功能以解决 Casey 所提出的问题。Domo 表示,鉴于简单性是 BRC-20 标准的基本原则,引入额外核心功能的建议是经过深思熟虑后提出的,并且非强制应用。迄今为止,几乎没有证据表明发生过这些“攻击”

ORDI 未受影响

今日午时,币安官网信息显示,ORDI “币种信息(Info)”界面内的内容已变更,删除了指向 Ordinals 协议的链接,新增描述“ORDI 是比特币区块链上第一个按照 BRC-20 代币标准创建的代币”。

截至 15 时,ORDI 依然维持在 13 USDT 以上,今日涨幅 30% ,并未受到该事件的冲击,Casey 的“梦想”仍有待实现。

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 год тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片