除了ORDI,BRC-20代币还有哪些价值洼地?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-11-07Востаннє оновлено о 2023-11-07

Анотація

生态规模较小,流动性集中于头部代币。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

除了ORDI,BRC-20代币还有哪些价值洼地?

今日下午,币安宣布上线 BRC-20 代币 ORDI;此后两小时,ORDI 价格飙升突破 12 USDT, 24 小时涨幅约 60% 。其他比特币生态热门币种包括 sats、rats 等价格也开始大幅上涨,涨幅超过 10% ,引起加密社区广泛关注。

Odaily星球日报基于 OKX Ordinals 市场数据,将 7 日交易量排行前十 BRC-20 代币的概念与数据整理如下。(Odaily 注:以下的张数为最小张数,实际可能存在单张 mint 代币数非上限值情况,导致实际总数增加)

除了ORDI,BRC-20代币还有哪些价值洼地?

sats

故事与概念:超高总量,历时 6 个月(3/9 ~ 9/24)铸造完毕;BTC 最小单位同名概念;将作为 Unisat 所推出的 L2 brc20-swap的 Gas 和交易对;

总量: 2,100,000,000,000,000 枚;21,000,000 张,每张 100,000,000 枚;

价格: 0.00039 sats(约 0.0000001521 美元);

市值: 319,410,000 美元;

rats

故事与概念:动物园概念龙头;超高总量,主要的份额耗时数天铸造完毕(3/11 已部署);sats 平替版概念;CZ 发推 emoji 概念;

总量:共 1,000,000,000,000 枚; 1,000,000 张,每张 1,000,000 枚;

价格: 0.037 sats(约 0.00001443 美元);

市值: 14,430,000 美元;

BTCs

故事与概念:地推概念;比特币铭文(相对以太铭文 ETHs);

总量: 21,000,000 枚;21000 张,每张 1, 000 枚;

价格: 1559 sats(约 0.60801 美元);

市值: 12,768,210 美元;

cats

故事与概念:动物园概念;高总量;

总量: 2,100,000,000 枚;210,000 张,每张 10, 000 枚;

价格: 1.72 sats(约 0.0006708 美元);

市值: 1,408,680 美元;

GROK

故事与概念:Musk 概念;

总量: 21,000,042 枚;约 49,881 张,每张 421 枚;

价格: 179 sats(约 0.06981 美元);

市值: 1,466,013 美元;

SHIB

故事与概念:SHIB 同名概念;

总量: 100,000,000,000,000 枚;100,000 张,每张 1, 000, 000, 000 枚;

价格: 0.00017 sats(约 0.0000000663 美元);

市值: 6,630,000 美元;

FRAM

故事与概念:纯 Meme,于 7-8 月曾在 OKX 成交第一;

总量: 8,000,000,000 枚;1 张,每张 8, 000, 000, 000 枚(即项目方一次铭刻了所有代币,然后再分发);

价格: 92.91 sats(约 0.0362349 美元);

市值: 289,879,200 美元(高度控盘);

IBTC

故事与概念:贝莱德所申请 BTC 现货 ETF 同名概念;

总量: 21,000,000 枚;210,000 张,每张 100 枚;

价格: 249 sats (约 0.09711 美元);

市值: 2,039,310 美元;

foxs

故事与概念:动物园概念;

总量: 100,000,000 枚;100,000 张,每张 1, 000 枚;

价格: 14.97 sats(约 0.0058383 美元);

市值: 583,830 美元;

lion

故事与概念:动物园概念;

总量: 100,000,000 枚;100,000 张,每张 1, 000 枚;

价格: 8.48 sats (约 0.0033072 美元);

市值: 330,720 美元;

综上,可见 BRC-20 市场目前存在几个特点:

  • 基本都为 Meme 币,暂无效用;

  • 市值均较小,只有 4 个代币市值超 1 千万美元,且其中 FRAM 为高度控盘币种;

  • 热度非常集中,第九、第十名的 foxs 和 lion 市值仅几十万美元, 7 日成交额约为 20 万美元;而 sats 7 日成交额为 1260 万美元,rats 为 294 万美元,BTCs 为 173 万美元,到了第四名的 cats 就锐减至 50 万美元。

BRC-20 市场规模仍较小,且由于基于挂单交易的机制波动性较大,一旦失去热度流动性也将锐减,请用户注意相关风险。

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 год тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片