LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-11-05Востаннє оновлено о 2023-11-05

Анотація

Arbitrum空投之前，也曾有过一模一样的操作。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Azuma

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

关于“LayerZero 即将空投”的流言正在各大社交媒体以及社群内疯传。

之所以在这个时间点出现如此多的猜测，是因为近期的确出现了一些潜在迹象，似乎均指向了 LayerZero 即将“搞个大的”。

比如预测市场 Polymarket 上关于 LayerZero 是否即将空投的预测中“yes”已压过了“no”；再比如基于 LayerZero 构建的上层应用 Tapioca 宣布将于 12 月 12 日进行重大更新，而该项更新的前提条件是依赖于 ZRO 进行去中心化验证；再比如与 LayerZero 团队关系莫逆的 Pudgy Penguins 首席执行官 Luca Netz 直接在 X 上喊话“已经等不及 ZRO 了”。

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

不过综合来看，最直观、热度最高的迹象则是暂未投入使用的「layerzero.foundation」 域名于 11 月 3 日添加了 SSL 证书。鉴于「layerzero.foundation」域名与已确定归属于 LayerZero 项目的「layerzero.network」域名过往的更新频率高度一致，所以社区猜测该域名同属 LayerZero 项目管理。

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

「layerzero.foundation」域名添加了 SSL 证书。

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

「layerzero.foundation」域名和「layerzero.network」域名曾在今年 3 月同步更新。

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？


「layerzero.foundation」域名和「layerzero.network」域名曾在今年 10 月同步更新。

翻看 LayerZero 项目的历史动作，该项目每次在进行重大动作前，往往都会对相关域名进行此类操作，比如：

  • 2022 年 9 月 7 日官宣推出协议浏览器 LayerZero Scan， 9 月 5 日时曾为「layerzeroscan.com」域名添加了 SSL 证书；

  • 2022 年 10 月 19 日官宣推出 Aptos 跨链桥， 10 月 17 日时曾为「theaptosbridge.com」域名添加了 SSL 证书；

  • 2022 年 11 月 17 日官宣推出 Bitcoin 跨链桥， 11 月 16 日时曾为「bitcoinbridge.network」域名添加了 SSL 证书；

  • 2023 年 2 月 21 日官宣推出 Goerli 测试网跨链桥， 2 月 20 日时曾为「testnetbridge.com」域名添加了 SSL 证书；

因此可推测，LayerZero 大概率接下来会进行一些与「layerzero.foundation」域名相关的动作。

可是什么动作一般会与「.foundation」尾缀域名挂钩呢？考虑到 Aptos、Arbitrum、Sei 等多个项目的空投都是通过基金会网站完成，且 Arbitrum 在今年 3 月宣布空投的前两日，恰好也曾进行过与 LayerZero 完全一致的操作 —— 为「arbitrum.foundation」尾缀域名添加了 SSL 证书，所以这很难不让社区用户浮想联翩。

LayerZero空投实锤？社区热议的“SSL证书”究竟是什么？

那么，所谓的 SSL 证书究竟是什么？该证书与潜在的空投（假设真的有）又有什么关系呢？

具体而言，SSL 是 Secure Sockets Layer 的缩写，这是一种网络通信加密协议。传统 http 协议的整个传输过程是明文传输，因此很容易造成数据劫持和篡改，而 SSL 协议则可以对传输过程进行加密，从而有效防止数据遭到监听和篡改。

用最简单的话来说就是，更新了 SSL 证书，可以保证网站更加安全。

由此推导，为「layerzero.foundation」域名更新 SSL 证书或许可以表明，LayerZero 希望通过一些措施来提高该网站的安全性。

更直白的说，假如 LayerZero 真的计划通过「layerzero.foundation」域名进行 ZRO 空投，团队自然会预测到，在社区的高涨情绪下，该网站的访问量及交互量均为迎来激增，因此有必要通过改善网站安全状况，进而确保用户安全。

不过，这一切依然只是假设情况。需要明确的是，仅仅是一个 SSL 证书并不足以证明 LayerZero 一定就会空投，客观来说这只是域名所有方改进基础设置质量的一项目举措而已。

究竟该如何解读，就见仁见智了。

Пов'язані матеріали

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit17 хв тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit17 хв тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit22 хв тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit22 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit28 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit28 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit28 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit28 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit43 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit43 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片