FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-11-01Востаннє оновлено о 2023-11-01

Анотація

抛压不大,社区无需恐慌。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

编辑 | 秦晓峰

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

FTX 相关事件一直是市场关注的重点。最近,FTX 关联钱包频繁转出大额资产疑似清算,引起加密社区担忧、恐慌。

其实在 9 月 14 日,法院已经批准了 FTX 资产清算方案:清算额度为首周上限 5000 万美元、后续每周上限 1 亿美元;但清算上限可与债权人沟通,最高 2 亿美元封顶。清算流程也相对清晰,刨除一些需要解锁的代币,剩余大部分代币都可以进行清算,其中比特币和以太坊需要提前 10 天向债权人委员会、特别委员会和美国受托人提供通知后才能出售。

不过,自清算方案批准后,FTX/Alameda 的相关钱包并没有太多动作,除了将部分 SOL 和 ETH 存入 Figment 进行质押外,剩余的持仓并无变化。

过去两周随着加密行情上行,FTX/Alameda 相关地址频繁发生大额异动,将多个币种转入交易所,引发了市场对于 FTX 资产清算而导致行情下跌的担忧。

针对近期 FTX/Alameda 相关地址的代币流出情况,Odaily星球日报进行了整理、统计与分析。

FTX/Alameda 相关地址代币流出统计

近一周内,FTX/Alameda 相关地址向币安和 Coinbase 共存入约 1.28 亿美元代币资产。下图为近一周 FTX/Alameda 相关地址的代币资产流出统计图:

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

从上图可以得知,近 7 天流出代币种类数量为 28 种,其中流出金额超 100 万美元的有 19 种代币。

代币流出数量前三名分别是:SOL 流出数量约为 126 万枚,价值约 4100 万美元;RNDR 流出数量约为 911 万枚,价值约 2200 万美元;ETH 流出数量约为 8738 万枚,价值约 1570 万美元。

(Odaily星球日报:上述金额为当天存入时的市场价格计算,数据来源于 FTX/Alameda 的 8 个热钱包地址和 2 个 SOL 冷钱包。)

FTX 代币资产清算对 SOL 影响较小

从 10 月 25 日开始,FTX/Alameda 相关地址陆续向交易所存入代币。作为 FTX 相关地址流出价值最高的代币,SOL 价格却并没有受到负面影响,反而逆流而上。

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

(SOL 价格日线图)

OKX 欧易行情显示,SOL 价格从 10 月 25 日的 30 USDT,不断攀升至今日最高点 39.8 USDT,创下去年 9 月以来最高水平,目前依然维持在 39 USDT 附近,过去一周涨幅超 20% 。

根据 CoinGecko 的数据显示,近 7 天 Solana 的交易量平均为 10 亿美元左右;FTX 相关地址存入交易所的 SOL 的当时总价值约为 4100 万美元。综合来看,这些清算对流动性较高的 SOL 冲击并不明显。

其他 FTX 钱包中持仓价值超过百万美元的小币种,诸如 BICO、AXS 等,普遍市值在 1 亿美元以上,清算带来的压力也并不大,相关币种在过去两周价格反而跟着大盘走高。

其实,FTX 代币资产清算的本质上是要利益最大化,尤其 FTX 的大部分 SOL 持仓受到结构化解锁计划的限制,短期的一次性抛售不会赚取更多的利益。

根据Odaily星球日报此前文章《拆解 FTX 的 34 亿美元持仓,前十币种抛压多大?》,截至 8 月 31 日 FTX 钱包地址持仓量为 34 亿美元;截止今日,FTX 的持仓总额超 50 亿美元——由于近期行情上涨,使 SOL 价格翻倍,比特币价格涨幅达 30% ,其他币种也都有一定的涨幅。

由此可见,市场行情对于 FTX 清算的重要性,FTX 的清算团队 Galaxy Digital 也不会急于抛售,抽干市场流动性。其次,根据文章开头所述,法院批准的 FTX 资产清算方案的每周上限最高才 2 亿美元,这对目前市场流动性来说并不会引起太大的波动。最后,FTX 代币资产清算不排除场外 OTC 交易的可能性;当清算方案批准后,像 DWF 等机构场外购买 FTX 代币资产的消息也开始频繁见诸报端。

总体而言,FTX 清算团队可能比我们更关心清算对市场的影响,而且清算对市场造成的抛压也并没有想象中的那般大,加密社区无需过分恐慌。

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit39 хв тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit39 хв тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit49 хв тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit49 хв тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片