FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-11-01Востаннє оновлено о 2023-11-01

Анотація

抛压不大,社区无需恐慌。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

编辑 | 秦晓峰

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

FTX 相关事件一直是市场关注的重点。最近,FTX 关联钱包频繁转出大额资产疑似清算,引起加密社区担忧、恐慌。

其实在 9 月 14 日,法院已经批准了 FTX 资产清算方案:清算额度为首周上限 5000 万美元、后续每周上限 1 亿美元;但清算上限可与债权人沟通,最高 2 亿美元封顶。清算流程也相对清晰,刨除一些需要解锁的代币,剩余大部分代币都可以进行清算,其中比特币和以太坊需要提前 10 天向债权人委员会、特别委员会和美国受托人提供通知后才能出售。

不过,自清算方案批准后,FTX/Alameda 的相关钱包并没有太多动作,除了将部分 SOL 和 ETH 存入 Figment 进行质押外,剩余的持仓并无变化。

过去两周随着加密行情上行,FTX/Alameda 相关地址频繁发生大额异动,将多个币种转入交易所,引发了市场对于 FTX 资产清算而导致行情下跌的担忧。

针对近期 FTX/Alameda 相关地址的代币流出情况,Odaily星球日报进行了整理、统计与分析。

FTX/Alameda 相关地址代币流出统计

近一周内,FTX/Alameda 相关地址向币安和 Coinbase 共存入约 1.28 亿美元代币资产。下图为近一周 FTX/Alameda 相关地址的代币资产流出统计图:

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

从上图可以得知,近 7 天流出代币种类数量为 28 种,其中流出金额超 100 万美元的有 19 种代币。

代币流出数量前三名分别是:SOL 流出数量约为 126 万枚,价值约 4100 万美元;RNDR 流出数量约为 911 万枚,价值约 2200 万美元;ETH 流出数量约为 8738 万枚,价值约 1570 万美元。

(Odaily星球日报:上述金额为当天存入时的市场价格计算,数据来源于 FTX/Alameda 的 8 个热钱包地址和 2 个 SOL 冷钱包。)

FTX 代币资产清算对 SOL 影响较小

从 10 月 25 日开始,FTX/Alameda 相关地址陆续向交易所存入代币。作为 FTX 相关地址流出价值最高的代币,SOL 价格却并没有受到负面影响,反而逆流而上。

FTX代币资产清算进行时,会对行情造成多大冲击?

(SOL 价格日线图)

OKX 欧易行情显示,SOL 价格从 10 月 25 日的 30 USDT,不断攀升至今日最高点 39.8 USDT,创下去年 9 月以来最高水平,目前依然维持在 39 USDT 附近,过去一周涨幅超 20% 。

根据 CoinGecko 的数据显示,近 7 天 Solana 的交易量平均为 10 亿美元左右;FTX 相关地址存入交易所的 SOL 的当时总价值约为 4100 万美元。综合来看,这些清算对流动性较高的 SOL 冲击并不明显。

其他 FTX 钱包中持仓价值超过百万美元的小币种,诸如 BICO、AXS 等,普遍市值在 1 亿美元以上,清算带来的压力也并不大,相关币种在过去两周价格反而跟着大盘走高。

其实,FTX 代币资产清算的本质上是要利益最大化,尤其 FTX 的大部分 SOL 持仓受到结构化解锁计划的限制,短期的一次性抛售不会赚取更多的利益。

根据Odaily星球日报此前文章《拆解 FTX 的 34 亿美元持仓,前十币种抛压多大?》,截至 8 月 31 日 FTX 钱包地址持仓量为 34 亿美元;截止今日,FTX 的持仓总额超 50 亿美元——由于近期行情上涨,使 SOL 价格翻倍,比特币价格涨幅达 30% ,其他币种也都有一定的涨幅。

由此可见,市场行情对于 FTX 清算的重要性,FTX 的清算团队 Galaxy Digital 也不会急于抛售,抽干市场流动性。其次,根据文章开头所述,法院批准的 FTX 资产清算方案的每周上限最高才 2 亿美元,这对目前市场流动性来说并不会引起太大的波动。最后,FTX 代币资产清算不排除场外 OTC 交易的可能性;当清算方案批准后,像 DWF 等机构场外购买 FTX 代币资产的消息也开始频繁见诸报端。

总体而言,FTX 清算团队可能比我们更关心清算对市场的影响,而且清算对市场造成的抛压也并没有想象中的那般大,加密社区无需过分恐慌。

Пов'язані матеріали

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit18 хв тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit18 хв тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit23 хв тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit23 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit29 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit29 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit29 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit29 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit44 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit44 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片