杀出新机遇? 争议纷纷的 Bitcoin Rollup 是什么?

MarsBitОпубліковано о 2023-07-12Востаннє оновлено о 2023-07-13

Анотація

Ordinals 协议带出的 Bitcoin NFT 热潮,正在引导 Bitcoin 生态发生新的转变,越来越多的参与者开始探讨 Bitcoin 的可扩展性问题。

.details .details-cont p, p {word-break: normal; text-align: unset} p img {text-align: center !important;} Ordinals 协议带出的 Bitcoin NFT 热潮,正在引导 Bitcoin 生态发生新的转变,越来越多的参与者开始探讨 Bitcoin 的可扩展性问题。 
在之前的文章中,我们介绍过「闪电网络」等 Bitcoin 第 2 层扩容解决方案。除上述解决方案外,在 Bitcoin 上应用 Rollup 协议提升可扩展性,也正在吸引更多的关注。
Bitcoin 的 Rollup
讲到 Rollup,通常都会联想到以太坊。
但在 2022 年 10 月,John Light 已发布了报告Validity Rollups on Bitcoin,展示了 Bitcoin 上应用 Rollup 协议的可行性规划和应用方法。
注:Validity Rollups on Bitcoin 报告可通过下方网址查阅:https://bitcoinrollups.org
Bitcoin 搭建的是相对简单的区块链架构,并希望让所有用户都可以在链上运行「节点」,在有需要或必要的时候,用户也可以轻松成为链上区块的开发者。
但是,如果一条区块链致力于要实现能让「所有」用户都轻松地运行完整节点,它一定需要设立规则限制这条链上验证区块时的计算量。
这样的矛盾,其实是去中心化与算力分布规模的矛盾。伴随 Bitcoin 的发展,这种紧张关系愈发明显,而能够缓和这种紧张关系的关键解决办法,就在于区块链可扩展性的提升。
提升可扩展性,目前关注度较高的解决方案包括通过分片、链上优化或链下设置通道解决。「闪电网络」就是在链下搭建支付通道,汇总到链上结算,通过减少交易次数实现扩展的解决方案;而应用 Rollup 协议的解决方案则是一种试图在链上放置尽可能少的数据,同时保持交易执行在链外的解决方案。
两者的区别在:「闪电网络」的大量交易数据保存在链下,但部署 Rollup 协议并不是将大量交易数据放在链下处理,它依旧是一种在链上进行数据优化的扩展解决方案。

数据

△ Bitcoin Rollup 分层展示示例图
图源/bitcoinrollups.org
上图展示了 Rollup 协议在 Bitcoin 上的分层应用:在 Bitcoin 的第 2 层有 2 个 Rollup 协议, 一个用于提供数据可用性,一个用于提供安全性支付和合约;在 Bitcoin 的第 3 层也有 3 个 Rollup 协议,也分别用于不同的用例 ,包括 P2P 支付、金融合约、游戏资产转让。
Rollup 的类型  
目前,应用在 Bitcoin 上的 Rollup 解决方案,讨论热度最高的是  Sovereign Rollup 解决方案(常译作「主权 Rollup」) ,与过去常见的经典 Rollup 协议,两者的主要区别在于如何利用主网、是否独立于主网
应用经典 Rollup 协议的解决方案,使用区块链的第 1 层(即「主网」)作为数据的可用层和结算层,相关数据不仅会存放在主网上,第 2 层相关数据也会写入到第 1 层。同时,交易由主网上的智能合约进行验证,比如以太坊上的知名 Rollup 项目 Arbitrum、Optimism 等。
应用 Sovereign Rollup 的解决方案,仅使用区块链的第 1 层作为数据的可用层,但不使用第 1 层执行结算。存放在第 2 层的数据,不会被写入到第 1 层,有一定的独立性。同时,交易由 Sovereign Rollup 上的节点进行验证,即使用 Sovereign Rollup 所在的第 2 层进行执行结算。

数据


数据

△ Sovereign Rollup 在链上的分层结构图 & 验证逻辑展示图
图源/celestia.org
Sovereign Rollup 运作方式的价值在于:无论第 1 层主网是遭遇了黑客攻击,还是需要进行技术升级,第 2 层都不受影响;其次,第 2 层并没有丢失第 1 层的数据安全性和抗审查性——这样的运作方式,对于 Bitcoin 这条主网算力受限的区块链而言,无疑是更可取的。
了解 Rollkit   
Bitcoin 社区对 Sovereign Rollup 的关注兴起于 2023 年 3 月。
彼时,Celestia 开发的开源技术框架 Rollkit 刚刚宣布完成了一项能将 Rollup 数据直接存储在 Bitcoin 链上的研究。此后,开发人员能够使用 Rollkit 在 Bitcoin 上部署 Rollup 协议提升可扩展性,并且最大限度地降低网络操作成本。
而 Rollkit 框架最大的特点之一是:可以允许开发人员自定义选择数据可用性层和执行层,同时支持开发人员进行 Sovereign Rollup 的部署。

数据

△ Rollkit 模块化开发框架
图源/rollkit.dev
应用展望 
Rollup 在以太坊上的积极应用部署,已经在逐步改变区块链用户对于以太坊上交易、数据存储、链上验证的感知。
虽然,Rollup 在 Bitcoin 上的部署尚处于起步阶段,但伴随 Rollkit 等开发工具的功能演进,也许在不久的将来,Rollup 同样会给 Bitcoin 社区带来更多值得探索的新范式。

Пов'язані матеріали

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit20 хв тому

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit20 хв тому

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit20 хв тому

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit20 хв тому

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit48 хв тому

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit48 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片