长推:2023年的RWA会是2019年的DeFi吗?

MarsBitОпубліковано о 2023-07-10Востаннє оновлено о 2023-07-10

Анотація

窃以为面向下一轮牛市的投资组合,应该将RWA和LSDfi 纳入资产配置表

注:本文来自@0xNing0x 推特,其是独立加密分析师,原推文内容由MarsBit整理如下:
2023年的RWA会是2019年的DeFi吗?
旧瓶装新酒,这是RWA在2023年给市场的普遍观感,这也恰是DeFi在2019年给市场的普遍观感
上一轮熊市,许许多多的加密投资者因为“旧瓶装新酒”的判断,而错过了DeFi的早期投资机会
那么错过2023年的RWA,会让我们再次在下个牛市拍断大腿吗?
这个问题很难回答。但作为一个市场经历两轮牛熊而幸存至今的老韭菜,我的直觉告诉我,需要首先放下傲慢和偏见,去认真调查研究 RWA,再审慎理性地加以判断
1 RWA的过去与现在:泛化==》具体
RWA(Real World Asset,真实世界资产)并没有一个权威的共识定义,我们这里使用指事法直接定义RWA,RWA即真实世界资产上链,Token化真实世界资产
它的一般架构分为链上和链下两部分:
--链上部分:支持智能合约的公链或者L2+获取真实世界资产价格和状态的预言机+实现RWA功能交互的一组智能合约等
--链下部分:真实世界资产托管机构、审计机制、保险机制等
如上所说,RWA并非是一个新概念,它在17年、18年的ICO风潮中就已经红极一时。当时有很多房地产上链、奢侈品上链、内容版权上链等项目,这些项目在各种方向上进行了尝试和探索,但后来均已被市场证伪
而23年再度兴起的RWA叙事,其内涵已非泛化的真实世界资产上链,而是局限于美债代币化
目前加密世界的美债代币化有3种路径:
--中心化稳定币的储备资产美债化。据公开信息,USDT、USDC、BUSD的发行方已经~80%的储备资产转换美债,估计这三家持有的美债总规模~$960亿美元,已经超越巴菲特的伯克希尔哈撒韦公司。这也是为什么加密KOL们戏称RWA龙头应该是USDT的原因。
--去中心化稳定币DAI在储备资产引入Token化美债。6月21日,MakerDAO动用协议金库资金买入$7亿美债,该行为被市场解读为协议金库的资产多元化配置
但其实据http://daistats.comhttp://makerburn.com网站平台数据,RWA早已纳入DAI的资产负债表,成为铸造DAI的抵押资产之一
目前狭义的RWA资产(代币化美债)在DAI抵押资产的占比为39.7%。如果我们把USDC和USDP也看做一种RAW资产的话,这一比例将上升至55%
--OndoFinance的美债代币化+货币市场基金。
OndoFinance是面向合规的专业投资者和机构的美债代币化平台
在通过严格的KYC和平台审核之后,投资者可以使用加密资产购买该平台发行的代币化美债$OUSG
$OUSG可以在OndoFinance旗下的去中心化货币市场FLUX借贷其它稳定币
但出于合规的需求,OndoFinance有意限制了$OUSG的自由度和可组合性
2 RWA再度兴起的大环境和小环境
--宏观大环境
6月1日,美国参议院通过债务上限法案,美债供给迅速突破$32万亿,10年期美债收益率(即折价率)持续攀升至4.05%高位,美国金融监管当局急需增发美债的承接力量
而环顾全球,只有两股可靠的力量有可能承接新发美债,一股力量是中国,这是主要的;另一股力量就是我们加密世界
而在3月银行危机结束之后,美国金融监管当局对加密的不友好政策逐渐清晰,监管原则从审慎监管转变为积极合规监管
在这样的宏观环境下,加密世界积极推动美债代币化,未尝不是一种变相地向美国金融监管当局“磕头”和输诚,是一种积极的生存策略
--行业小环境
事实上,我们可以将稳定币视作加密世界的基础货币,将DeFi借贷协议的TVL和CeFi借贷平台的AUM视作加密世界的信贷余额
在经历2022年的熊市洗礼后,中心化稳定币从高峰期的~$1400亿跌至目前的~$1200亿,跌幅14.28%,萎缩并不严重
但为什么我们会觉得市场的流动性萎缩非常严重呢?
这是因为加密世界的信贷规模在同期萎缩极为严重。这主要是因为LUNA\UST和Celsius的爆雷,引发加密世界两大信用创造神器算法稳定币和CeFi平台的全面崩盘
在3家美国加密友好银行破产关闭之后,在BUSD被美国金融监管格局勒令停止新增发行之后,在可预期的未来中心化稳定币规模很难重新恢复正增长
在加密世界基础货币增长受限的情况下,行业通过引入代币化美债尝试两个方向的探索:
--既然中心化稳定币扩张受限,那就优先恢复去中心化稳定币的扩张。如MakerDAO将代币化美债引入DAI资产端,创造新的DAI
--通过代币化被全球视作无风险资产的美债,为DeFi借贷协议增信和增厚收益,在合适的时机以代币化美债为基础重新启动DeFi乐高循环创造信用,恢复加密世界的信贷规模
3 RWA赛道的投资策略
如果我们以Gartner新兴技术成长曲线观察,2023年的RWA可能正处于2019年的DeFi所在的阶段,即从泡沫破裂谷底期==>稳步爬升复苏期
RWA和LSDfi一样是房间内的大象,是加密世界投资的两张明牌,却往往会被大家熟视无睹
窃以为面向下一轮牛市的投资组合,应该将RWA和LSDfi
纳入资产配置表
声明:以上内容不作为投资建议,仅供参考。

RWA

Пов'язані матеріали

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit41 хв тому

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit41 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1 год тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片