今日币价07/07:比特币暴跌至3万美元,山寨币和美股火热,因投资者担心美联储将继续加息

Tap Chi BitcoinОпубліковано о 2023-07-07Востаннє оновлено о 2023-07-07

Анотація

7 月 6 日华尔街开盘后,比特币继续波动,当年高点被回调所取代。

7 月 6 日华尔街开盘后,比特币继续波动,当年高点被回调所取代。

BTC 价格图表 – 1 小时 |来源:TradingView

周四(7月6日)美国股市下跌,好于预期的就业数据引发投资者对未来利率走势的担忧。

截至收盘,道琼斯指数下跌366.38点(相当于1.07%)至33922.26点。标准普尔 500 指数下跌 0.79%,至 4,411.59 点。纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.82%至13,679.04点。周四标记道琼斯指数和标准普尔 500 指数自 2023 年 5 月以来的最大跌幅。

三大股指都将创下单周跌幅纪录,仅剩周五交易日。道琼斯指数本周迄今已下跌 1.4%,标准普尔 500 指数和纳斯达克综合指数分别下跌 0.9% 和 0.8%。

ADP数据显示,6月美国私营部门新增就业岗位49.7万个,标记2022年7月以来最强劲的月份。 6 月份的就业增长是道琼斯预测的 220,000 个就业岗位的两倍多,远好于 5 月份的 267,000 个。两年期美国国债收益率上升至交易 16 年来的新高。

ADP 数据通常不可靠,并且被认为比其他就业数据波动性更大,该数据发布于周五美国官方 6 月就业报告(7 月 7 日 07)之前。经济学家预测美国经济上个月创造了 24 万个就业岗位,略低于 5 月份新增的 33.9 万个就业岗位。

然而,投资者现在可能期待更热门的数据,导致美联储(Fed)在6月会议暂停后,本月恢复加息。CME Group的FedWatch工具,投资者预测美联储加息的可能性为92%在月底的会议上。

另一方面,根据美国劳工部的报告,5 月份招聘人数下降幅度超出预期。这一数据可能会给稀缺的劳动力市场至少有所缓解带来希望。

与此同时,周四(7月6日)金价跌至近一周来最低水平,好于预期的美国私营部门就业报告提振了对美联储将加息的预期更多,从而推高美国债券收益率。

截至周四交易日,现货黄金合约下跌0.38%至每盎司1,910.01美元。黄金期货下跌 0.6%,至每盎司 1,915.4 美元。

周四(7月6日)油价基本持平,因市场权衡美国原油供应更加稀缺以及美联储加息可能抑制能源需求。

截至收盘,布伦特原油合约下跌 13 美分,至每桶 76.52 美元,前一交易日上涨 0.5%。 WTI 合约小幅上涨 1 美分,至每桶 71.8 美元,前一交易日上涨 2.9%,追赶本周早些时候布伦特原油价格。

TradingView 的数据追踪了 BTC 价格走势,当时其价格徘徊在 30,000 美元大关附近。

当天早些时候,比特币上涨至 2022 年中期以来的最高水平,但随着最大的加密货币回吐了所有涨幅,这场盛会很快就结束了。

BTC/美元甚至在 29,701 美元附近创下了 7 月新低。

受欢迎的交易员 Jelle 是关注价格重返 28,000 美元区间可能性的人士之一,他认为这是一个合适的切入点。

交易公司 8 的创始人兼首席执行官 Michaël van de Poppe 在部分评论中写道:“比特币已回到底部,需要转为看涨,否则可能会出现 28,500 美元的情况。市场预计在积极的失业数据的支持下加息。”

BTC/USD 图表,带标题 |资料来源:迈克尔·范·德·波普

Van de Poppe提到了华尔街开市前公布的强劲美国就业数据,这提振了市场对美联储(Fed)将在7月底再次加息的预期。

随着BTC跌破3万美元,许多未平仓合约被清仓,但总体清算量仍然不是很高。

根据监控资源 CoinGlass 的数据,7 月 6 日,BTC做多和做空清算额为 4300 万美元。加密货币清算总额约为 1.2 亿美元。

加密货币清算数据 |来源:CoinGlass

在山寨币方面,市场继续走低,最大的市值资产回到 30,000 美元以下。

领涨的是 Fantom (FTM),代币当天价值下跌了 10% 以上。该项目也抹去了前一周的势头,近7天跌幅接近11%。

前 100 名中的其他主要山寨币如 WOO Network (WOO)、ApeCoin (APE)、Lido DAO (LDO)、Algorand (ALGO)、Pepe (PEPE)、Litecoin (LTC)、Mina (MINA)、Injective (INJ) 、Filecoin (FIL)、UNUS SED LEO (LEO)……当日跌幅为 4-9%。

资料来源:Coinmarketcap

在触及 1,956 美元的局部高点后,以太坊(ETH) 面临巨大的抛售压力,拖累第二大市值资产突破 1,900 美元大关,在 1,832 美元附近建立局部底部,为 6 月下旬以来的最低水平。ETH 目前已略有回升至1,844美元附近,当日跌幅近3%。

ETH 价格图表 – 1 小时 |来源:TradingView

Пов'язані матеріали

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit40 хв тому

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit40 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit59 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit59 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片