随着香港为散户投资者开放加密货币交易,比特币跃升至关键价格阻力位

CoindeskОпубліковано о 2023-05-24Востаннє оновлено о 2023-05-24

Анотація

由于香港表示散户投资者可以从 6 月 1 日起交易数字资产,比特币 ( BTC ) 周二早盘升至关键价格阻力位。

由于香港表示散户投资者可以从 6 月 1 日起交易数字资产,比特币 ( BTC ) 周二早盘升至关键价格阻力位。

香港证券及期货事务监察委员会 (SFC) 宣布将从 6 月 1 日起接受交易所向散户投资者提供加密货币交易的申请,并补充说获批的代币需要有 12 个月的业绩记录和可观的市值。证监会表示,注册交易所将被禁止提供稳定币和生息工具。

该公告符合长期以来的预期,即亚洲的发展将促进下一次加密货币牛市,并与西方,尤其是美国缺乏规律性形成鲜明对比

比特币在亚洲时段上涨超过 2% 至 27,500 美元,试探了连接头肩 (H&S) 形态第一和第二波谷的水平趋势线的前支撑转阻力位。本月初,该加密货币跌破趋势线,证实了 H&S 的崩溃,并为进一步下滑至 25,000 美元打开了大门。

“这看起来像是一个与宏观无关的基于现货的举动,而且时间恰逢香港将从 6 月 1 日起允许在许可数字资产平台上进行BTC和ETH零售交易的消息,”Noelle Acheson,作者Crypto Is Macro Now 通讯,在周二的版本中说。 “这并不完全出人意料——裁决和时间安排在很大程度上是意料之中的。但在一个低迷的市场中,由于来自其他方面的不利因素, 确认更为重要,”艾奇逊补充道。

Per Acheson 表示,香港为散户投资者开绿灯加密货币交易的决定并不意味着对加密货币的需求会大量涌现,因为本地交易商可能已经通过离岸场所进入市场。尽管如此,艾奇逊指出,该公告是“一个受欢迎的提醒,即加密货币采用池在明年及以后可能会大幅增长”。

比特币周二早些时候升至 H&S 阻力位。 (TradingView)(TradingView)

据总部位于加拿大的数字资产流动性提供者Secure Digital Markets 称,比特币需要清除 H&S 趋势线阻力位和 27,500 美元的 20 天简单移动平均线才能确认牛市复苏。

“只要价格保持在这种 [H&S] 形态的颈线 [水平趋势线] 以及 20 日移动平均线下方,我们就应该预期会进一步下跌至 25,250 美元,可能跌至 24,000 美元,”那里的分析师写道。

比特币的短期前景还取决于正在进行的美国债务上限戏剧和美元指数的轨迹。财政部长珍妮特耶伦警告说,如果不能达成债务协议,政府将在 6 月初耗尽资金,为许多人所说的灾难性违约敞开大门。 一些分析师表示,成功解决债务上限问题可能会让财政部从市场吸走流动性,并对比特币施加下行压力。

最后,债券收益率正在上升,这表明投资者正在重新评估美联储继续其加息行动并在更长时间内保持较高借贷成本的可能性。

截至发稿时,美国 10 年期国债收益率升至 3.75% 的两个多月高位,而两年期国债收益率则跳升至 4.4%,为 3 月 13 日以来的最高水平。收益率上升削弱了科技股等风险资产的吸引力,加密货币和黄金等零收益资产。

Пов'язані матеріали

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit32 хв тому

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit32 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit38 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit38 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit38 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit38 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报47 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片