一文解读3月3日加密市场大跌消息背景

重本聪聪Опубліковано о 2023-03-03Востаннє оновлено о 2023-03-10

Анотація

Silvergate真的会存在暴雷问题么?

3月3日早间9时左右,比特币出现快速下跌,15分钟内跌幅超5%,市场整体同步下行。据火必行情,BTC最低报21970美元,ETH最低报1529美元。

其中有三条消息大家需要重点关注:加密友好银行Silvergate出现经营危机股价大跌;FTX确认有89亿美元的客户资金已丢失;美SEC主席起草新规则,加密交易平台的资金托管需要得到监管。

3月2日晚间,美股上市公司、加密友好银行Silvergate宣布亏损可能会使运营资金不足,其正在评估自身持续经营的能力。Silvergate股价随即暴跌,当日跌幅超57%,较历史最高价下跌超95%。

Silvergate Bank成立于1988年。2014年1月,Silvergate成为第一批愿意为加密货币交易开设账户的银行之一。据悉,该银行已经服务了750个加密货币交易平台。2022年三季度,Silvergate的实时支付系统Silvergate Exchange Network存有120亿美元的存款,其中包括所有主要的加密货币交易所和1000多个机构投资者。

在Silvergate股价下跌后,加密市场相关机构纷纷表态撇清关系,目前为止表态的公司如下。

Coinbase、Galaxy Digital、Crypto.com、Bitstamp、Gemini、Circle宣布停止合作;

MicroStrategy、Tether、Paxos表示没有资金往来;

摩根大通和Canaccord下调Silvergate股票评级。

但Silvergate真的会存在暴雷问题么?

Silvergate是正规的美股上市公司,会定期公开财务报表。而且它是一家银行,加密资产相关的主要是建立法币和加密货币的支付通道,以及存款。与三箭资本或FTX相比,Silvergate的透明度要高的多,而且业务清晰。即使暴雷,也不会产生纯加密机构暴雷那么大的影响。目前主要的问题是加密机构在其中的存款会不会受到影响。但从经验判断,交易所和加密机构会把大笔资金放在银行么?

另外一个关于FTX的消息则并未得到市场重视,但从下跌时点上看则非常吻合。

北京时间3月3日早上9点15分,华尔街日报发布消息称,FTX存在89亿美元财务赤字,这是FTX首次明确自己的资金状况。FTX实际公布自己财务情况的时间则是3月3日凌晨2点40分,当时市场并未反应,直到早间媒体报道,并扩散到华语市场后,才出现大跌。

这里有个标题党的文字问题,华尔街日报的标题使用的是“FTX丢失89亿美元”,而实际上是FTX财务的缺口有什么这么多,而且是大部分钱被Alameda Research LLC借走了。如果真是被盗丢了89亿美元,那问题确实非常严重。

即使这样,FTX糟糕的财务状况也引发了市场担忧。

最后一个消息来自监管压力。

3月3日,美国SEC主席Gary Gensler在SEC官网发文表示,其人已加入投资者咨询委员会。该委员会近期提交了一项新的投资顾问保护规则。该规则根据国会2010年的规定,将托管规则扩大到涵盖投资者的所有资产,而不仅仅是他们的资金或证券。拟议规则还将要求顾问和托管方之间达成书面协议,增加对外国机构担任托管方的要求,并将保障规则明确扩展至全权委托交易。

Gary Gensler在文章中强调,根据加密货币交易和借贷平台的一般运作方式,加密交易平台今后将不再能依托投资顾问的角色而成为合格托管方。要成为新规则下的合格托管人,平台需要确保所有资产都得到妥善隔离,接受公共会计师的年度审计,并采取其他透明度措施。

意思就是加密交易平台如果存放客户资产则必须增加透明度,接受监管,否则加密资产不能存放在交易平台上。虽然法规还正在起草,到具体执行还有很长时间,但这是一种监管收紧的态度,在熊市下对交易平台非常不利。

重本聪认为,以上三条消息共同作用,最终导致了今日市场下跌。

后续的关注点,FTX的资金缺口已成定局,市场预期已经在价格上反应过了,今日只是一时恐慌罢了。Silvergate则需要重点关注,到底有没有雷,有多大的资金量受到影响,如果小概率出现意外,影响金额较大,可能会再次引发机构暴雷,打开更深的下跌空间。SEC监管影响的只是长期走势,靴子落地还早。

Пов'язані матеріали

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit32 хв тому

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit32 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit38 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit38 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit38 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit38 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报47 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片