$100M Underground Remittance Network Using Crypto, WeChat Dismantled In South Korea

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-01-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-20

Анотація

South Korean authorities have dismantled an underground remittance network that moved approximately $102 million (150 billion won) across borders using mobile payment apps like WeChat Pay and Alipay and cryptocurrencies. The scheme, which operated from September 2021 to June 2023, involved collecting funds from customers via the apps, converting the money into crypto abroad, and then cashing it out into South Korean bank accounts after transferring the digital assets to local wallets. To evade detection, the group disguised the transactions as payments for common services such as cosmetic surgery, study abroad fees, and trade-related costs. Three Chinese nationals have been arrested and face charges under foreign exchange laws. The case highlights the growing use of combined traditional and digital payment channels for illicit fund movements, prompting South Korea to strengthen regulations on crypto exchanges and mobile wallets.

Seoul investigators say they have disrupted a secret money-transfer network that moved roughly 150 billion won—about $102 million—into and out of South Korea using a mix of mobile payment apps and cryptocurrencies.

Reports say three people have been formally accused under the country’s foreign exchange laws after a probe that traced the scheme over several years.

How Money Moved Through Apps

According to the Korea Customs Service, the group collected money from customers using platforms like WeChat Pay and Alipay, then used those funds to buy virtual coins abroad.

Those coins were shifted into digital wallets in Korea and converted to Korean won through many bank accounts.

The pattern was basic and careful. Cash or mobile transfers arrived from overseas. Crypto purchases followed in multiple countries to avoid any one regulator seeing the full trail.

Finally, the funds were funneled into local accounts under different names. This took place over a long window, from September of 2021 until June of last year, investigators say.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $92,895. Chart: TradingView

Covering Tracks With Everyday Costs

According to reports, the ring hid the origin of money by dressing transfers up as ordinary expenses — payments for cosmetic surgery, fees for overseas study, and trade-related charges. Those labels made the flows look normal on paper and helped the group slip past routine checks.

Bank transfers were layered with small, seemingly legitimate payments. That made suspicious activity harder to spot until customs officers pieced together patterns across accounts and platforms.

At that point, the scope became clear: these were not isolated transfers but a linked series of transactions designed to wash large sums.

Image: Getty Images

What Authorities Recovered

Investigators arrested and referred three Chinese nationals for prosecution, saying the suspects handled the bulk of the scheme’s operations.

Records show almost 150 billion won was moved in the period under review. Authorities have opened cases under the foreign exchange transactions law and are seeking to trace the remaining funds.

The case underlines how easy it can be for cross-border payment tools and crypto markets to be used together.

Regulators in Korea have been tightening rules for both mobile wallets and exchanges in recent months, and courts have allowed seizures of crypto assets in criminal probes. That legal backdrop helped the customs office act when the patterns surfaced.

Featured image from Dao Insights, chart from TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total amount of money moved by the underground remittance network in South Korea, and what was the equivalent in US dollars?

AThe network moved approximately 150 billion won, which is equivalent to about $102 million.

QWhich mobile payment apps and methods were used by the group to collect money from customers?

AThe group used platforms like WeChat Pay and Alipay to collect money from customers.

QHow did the group disguise the illegal money transfers to avoid detection by authorities?

AThey disguised transfers as ordinary expenses such as payments for cosmetic surgery, fees for overseas study, and trade-related charges to make them appear normal and avoid routine checks.

QWhat was the role of cryptocurrencies in this underground remittance network?

AThe group used the collected funds to buy virtual coins abroad, which were then transferred to digital wallets in South Korea and converted to Korean won through multiple bank accounts.

QHow many people were formally accused in connection with this scheme, and what nationality were the main suspects?

AThree Chinese nationals were arrested and referred for prosecution, as they handled the bulk of the scheme's operations.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit43 хв тому

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit43 хв тому

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 год тому

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片