7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

On April 9, according to the Iranian Students' News Agency, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Eslami, stated that no law or individual can prevent Iran from executing its uranium enrichment program, asserting that claims to limit Iran's uranium enrichment will ultimately come to nothing. Eslami also mentioned that the 'enemies' now seek to reach an agreement through negotiations because their previous actions, including acts of war, have yielded no results. (Xinhua News Agency)

[Iran's Atomic Energy Organization Chief: No One Can Stop Iran's Uranium Enrichment Program]On April 9, according to the Iranian Students' News Agency, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Eslami, stated that no law or individual can prevent Iran from executing its uranium enrichment program, asserting that claims to limit Iran's uranium enrichment will ultimately come to nothing. Eslami also mentioned that the 'enemies' now seek to reach an agreement through negotiations because their previous actions, including acts of war, have yielded no results. (Xinhua News Agency)

Iran's Atomic Energy Organization Chief: No One Can Stop Iran's Uranium Enrichment Program

On April 9, multiple sources reported that Iran has put forward 'ten demands' in ceasefire negotiations, covering security, sanctions, nuclear issues, and regional military arrangements. Although some terms have shown signs of flexibility, significant differences remain between the US and Iran on key issues, leaving the prospects for an agreement unclear. The main points of contention include: Control of the Strait of Hormuz: Iran demands to maintain control over this critical energy passage, while the US insists on 'full openness,' leading to sharp disagreements. Uranium enrichment rights: Iran seeks to retain its enrichment capabilities, which the US has previously opposed, leaving only symbolic compromise space. Sanctions relief: Iran demands a complete lifting of primary and secondary sanctions, but this involves considerations from the US Congress and national security, making implementation difficult. US troop withdrawal from the Middle East: Iran hopes for a complete withdrawal of US forces, but the US is unlikely to accept this in the short term. Scope of regional conflicts: Iran advocates for including fronts such as Lebanon in the ceasefire, but the US has clearly denied such arrangements. Additionally, Iran's demands for war reparations and the termination of relevant UN and nuclear oversight resolutions face significant political and legal obstacles. Notably, mediators have revealed that Iran has made concessions on some terms, including downplaying compensation demands and adjusting its stance on nuclear issues, but overall negotiations remain in a phase of contention. Analysts believe that the current ceasefire is more likely a 'temporary buffer' rather than a substantive solution. Until core interests are aligned, the situation remains at risk of fluctuations.

[Discrepancies in US-Iran 'Ten Demands' Revealed: Significant Controversies over Core Terms, Uncertainty Remains in Ceasefire Negotiations]On April 9, multiple sources reported that Iran has put forward 'ten demands' in ceasefire negotiations, covering security, sanctions, nuclear issues, and regional military arrangements. Although some terms have shown signs of flexibility, significant differences remain between the US and Iran on key issues, leaving the prospects for an agreement unclear. The main points of contention include: Control of the Strait of Hormuz: Iran demands to maintain control over this critical energy passage, while the US insists on 'full openness,' leading to sharp disagreements. Uranium enrichment rights: Iran seeks to retain its enrichment capabilities, which the US has previously opposed, leaving only symbolic compromise space. Sanctions relief: Iran demands a complete lifting of primary and secondary sanctions, but this involves considerations from the US Congress and national security, making implementation difficult. US troop withdrawal from the Middle East: Iran hopes for a complete withdrawal of US forces, but the US is unlikely to accept this in the short term. Scope of regional conflicts: Iran advocates for including fronts such as Lebanon in the ceasefire, but the US has clearly denied such arrangements. Additionally, Iran's demands for war reparations and the termination of relevant UN and nuclear oversight resolutions face significant political and legal obstacles. Notably, mediators have revealed that Iran has made concessions on some terms, including downplaying compensation demands and adjusting its stance on nuclear issues, but overall negotiations remain in a phase of contention. Analysts believe that the current ceasefire is more likely a 'temporary buffer' rather than a substantive solution. Until core interests are aligned, the situation remains at risk of fluctuations.

Discrepancies in US-Iran 'Ten Demands' Revealed: Significant Controversies over Core Terms, Uncertainty Remains in Ceasefire Negotiations

On April 9, EU Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis stated in the European Parliament that the EU faces the risk of concurrent inflation and economic stagnation due to the war in Iran. He pointed out that despite the announcement of a ceasefire this week, the long-term outlook remains shrouded in significant uncertainty. Dombrovskis warned that the European economy is at risk of stagflation. He indicated that EU analysis suggests that in a short-term disruption scenario, economic growth could be approximately 0.2 to 0.4 percentage points lower than the EU's predictions from last autumn, while inflation could be 1 percentage point higher. He stated: If supply disruptions are more severe and prolonged, the negative impact on growth will be greater. Growth in 2026 and 2027 could be 0.6 percentage points lower, with inflation being even higher.

[EU Economic Commissioner: Risks of Stagflation Impacting European Economy]On April 9, EU Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis stated in the European Parliament that the EU faces the risk of concurrent inflation and economic stagnation due to the war in Iran. He pointed out that despite the announcement of a ceasefire this week, the long-term outlook remains shrouded in significant uncertainty. Dombrovskis warned that the European economy is at risk of stagflation. He indicated that EU analysis suggests that in a short-term disruption scenario, economic growth could be approximately 0.2 to 0.4 percentage points lower than the EU's predictions from last autumn, while inflation could be 1 percentage point higher. He stated: If supply disruptions are more severe and prolonged, the negative impact on growth will be greater. Growth in 2026 and 2027 could be 0.6 percentage points lower, with inflation being even higher.

EU Economic Commissioner: Risks of Stagflation Impacting European Economy

On April 9, WTI crude oil futures surged 5.00% during the day, currently priced at $99.14 per barrel.

[WTI Crude Oil Futures Surge 5.00% in a Day]On April 9, WTI crude oil futures surged 5.00% during the day, currently priced at $99.14 per barrel.

WTI Crude Oil Futures Surge 5.00% in a Day

On April 9, according to ITV News, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister made the latest statements on two major issues. He denied that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, stating that the strait is open to all civilian vessels and that related reports are incorrect. However, he pointed out that due to leftover naval mines from the war, passing ships must contact Iranian authorities in advance to obtain safe navigation guidance, and those who have communicated with Iran have received permission to pass. The Iranian delegation will go to Islamabad for peace negotiations, but on the condition that Israel stops its attacks on Lebanon. The Deputy Foreign Minister emphasized that any regional peace agreement must include Lebanon, stating, 'The next few hours will be crucial.' He also revealed that Iran was on the verge of taking retaliatory action last night but ultimately chose restraint in consideration of advancing diplomacy, especially since the U.S. has requested Israel to cease fire. Currently, Iran still leaves room for negotiations, but its stance is clear: a ceasefire in Lebanon is a prerequisite for participation, and the direction of the situation in the coming hours will directly determine whether the Islamabad talks can proceed as scheduled.

[Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Strait of Hormuz Not Closed, Negotiations Must Progress with Conditions]On April 9, according to ITV News, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister made the latest statements on two major issues. He denied that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, stating that the strait is open to all civilian vessels and that related reports are incorrect. However, he pointed out that due to leftover naval mines from the war, passing ships must contact Iranian authorities in advance to obtain safe navigation guidance, and those who have communicated with Iran have received permission to pass. The Iranian delegation will go to Islamabad for peace negotiations, but on the condition that Israel stops its attacks on Lebanon. The Deputy Foreign Minister emphasized that any regional peace agreement must include Lebanon, stating, 'The next few hours will be crucial.' He also revealed that Iran was on the verge of taking retaliatory action last night but ultimately chose restraint in consideration of advancing diplomacy, especially since the U.S. has requested Israel to cease fire. Currently, Iran still leaves room for negotiations, but its stance is clear: a ceasefire in Lebanon is a prerequisite for participation, and the direction of the situation in the coming hours will directly determine whether the Islamabad talks can proceed as scheduled.

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister: Strait of Hormuz Not Closed, Negotiations Must Progress with Conditions

On April 9, Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan Moghaddam suddenly deleted a social media post announcing the delegation's attendance at the talks in Islamabad, adding uncertainty to the first round of US-Iran peace negotiations originally scheduled to take place there. The White House confirmed on Thursday that Vice President JD Vance will lead a delegation to Pakistan on Saturday to attend the talks. There are fundamental disagreements between the US and Iran regarding the ceasefire agreement reached on Tuesday: 1. Lebanese Issue: Iran insists that the ceasefire covers Lebanon and demands that Israel stop its attacks on Hezbollah; Trump and Vance have explicitly denied this, stating that Lebanon was never included in the ceasefire scope. 2. Uranium Enrichment Issue: Iran claims that the agreement guarantees its right to uranium enrichment, while the US has made it clear that it 'will never accept' this. Iranian Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf issued a statement on Wednesday, listing three alleged violations: the ceasefire in Lebanon has not been observed, drone incursions into Iranian airspace, and denial of uranium enrichment rights, bluntly stating that 'under these circumstances, bilateral ceasefire or negotiations are completely unreasonable.' The core contradictions are as follows: Israel refuses to halt military actions against Hezbollah, and the US rejects Iran's uranium enrichment. The negotiations have not yet begun, and cracks are already appearing in the foundation. The subsequent direction depends on whether the Iranian delegation ultimately proceeds.

[Change in US-Iran Islamabad Negotiations, Ceasefire Agreement Faces Uncertainty]On April 9, Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan Moghaddam suddenly deleted a social media post announcing the delegation's attendance at the talks in Islamabad, adding uncertainty to the first round of US-Iran peace negotiations originally scheduled to take place there. The White House confirmed on Thursday that Vice President JD Vance will lead a delegation to Pakistan on Saturday to attend the talks. There are fundamental disagreements between the US and Iran regarding the ceasefire agreement reached on Tuesday: 1. Lebanese Issue: Iran insists that the ceasefire covers Lebanon and demands that Israel stop its attacks on Hezbollah; Trump and Vance have explicitly denied this, stating that Lebanon was never included in the ceasefire scope. 2. Uranium Enrichment Issue: Iran claims that the agreement guarantees its right to uranium enrichment, while the US has made it clear that it 'will never accept' this. Iranian Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf issued a statement on Wednesday, listing three alleged violations: the ceasefire in Lebanon has not been observed, drone incursions into Iranian airspace, and denial of uranium enrichment rights, bluntly stating that 'under these circumstances, bilateral ceasefire or negotiations are completely unreasonable.' The core contradictions are as follows: Israel refuses to halt military actions against Hezbollah, and the US rejects Iran's uranium enrichment. The negotiations have not yet begun, and cracks are already appearing in the foundation. The subsequent direction depends on whether the Iranian delegation ultimately proceeds.

Change in US-Iran Islamabad Negotiations, Ceasefire Agreement Faces Uncertainty

On April 9, the Web3 fan platform OneFootball Club announced that the distribution of OFC tokens has been completed. Users who participated in the CoinList community sale can now receive the Ethereum mainnet ERC-20 version of the OFC tokens in their non-custodial wallets, with the withdrawal feature now available.

[OneFootball Club Completes OFC Token Distribution from CoinList Community Sale]On April 9, the Web3 fan platform OneFootball Club announced that the distribution of OFC tokens has been completed. Users who participated in the CoinList community sale can now receive the Ethereum mainnet ERC-20 version of the OFC tokens in their non-custodial wallets, with the withdrawal feature now available.

OneFootball Club Completes OFC Token Distribution from CoinList Community Sale

On April 9, gaming giant Valve was reported to be developing an internal artificial intelligence tool called 'SteamGPT', primarily aimed at improving customer service processing efficiency and internal task management capabilities. According to leaked backend code information, the system includes two main modules: 'SteamGPT' and 'SteamGPTSummary', which can automatically retrieve and summarize player account information (such as registration duration, credit score, etc.), assisting customer service in quickly assessing user situations and resolving issues. Additionally, the tool can intelligently summarize support requests and internal tasks, optimizing team workflows. Currently, SteamGPT is positioned as an internal productivity tool and is not available to users. Valve prefers to leverage AI's retrieval and summarization capabilities to enhance operational efficiency rather than directly introducing a conversational AI for players.

[Valve Developing Internal AI Tool 'SteamGPT' to Enhance Customer Service and Operations Efficiency]On April 9, gaming giant Valve was reported to be developing an internal artificial intelligence tool called 'SteamGPT', primarily aimed at improving customer service processing efficiency and internal task management capabilities. According to leaked backend code information, the system includes two main modules: 'SteamGPT' and 'SteamGPTSummary', which can automatically retrieve and summarize player account information (such as registration duration, credit score, etc.), assisting customer service in quickly assessing user situations and resolving issues. Additionally, the tool can intelligently summarize support requests and internal tasks, optimizing team workflows. Currently, SteamGPT is positioned as an internal productivity tool and is not available to users. Valve prefers to leverage AI's retrieval and summarization capabilities to enhance operational efficiency rather than directly introducing a conversational AI for players.

Valve Developing Internal AI Tool 'SteamGPT' to Enhance Customer Service and Operations Efficiency

On April 9, as tensions between the U.S. and Iran eased temporarily, Wall Street began to form a trading logic centered around Trump's policy style—referred to as 'TACO Trading' (Trump Always Chickens Out). The market generally believes that Trump's hardline statements in geopolitics often end in compromise, viewing escalations as buying signals. Data shows that the market had already positioned itself for risk assets before Trump announced a pause in military actions against Iran. The S&P 500 index recorded its first weekly gain in six weeks, and the risk premium in the options market remained low, indicating limited investor reaction to extreme scenarios. Institutional views suggest that the current market is repeating a cycle of 'conflict escalation—emotional pressure—cooling situation—asset rebound.' Some analysts point out that systematic investors are in 'one of the most profitable environments in history.' However, there are also warnings that such a high level of consensus may weaken the market's constraints on policy. If the market no longer reacts negatively to aggressive rhetoric, it could incentivize riskier policy actions, increasing potential tail risks.

[TACO Trading Dominates Market: Investors Bet on Trump's 'Maximum Pressure Will Eventually Back Down', Buying on Dips Becomes Mainstream Strategy]On April 9, as tensions between the U.S. and Iran eased temporarily, Wall Street began to form a trading logic centered around Trump's policy style—referred to as 'TACO Trading' (Trump Always Chickens Out). The market generally believes that Trump's hardline statements in geopolitics often end in compromise, viewing escalations as buying signals. Data shows that the market had already positioned itself for risk assets before Trump announced a pause in military actions against Iran. The S&P 500 index recorded its first weekly gain in six weeks, and the risk premium in the options market remained low, indicating limited investor reaction to extreme scenarios. Institutional views suggest that the current market is repeating a cycle of 'conflict escalation—emotional pressure—cooling situation—asset rebound.' Some analysts point out that systematic investors are in 'one of the most profitable environments in history.' However, there are also warnings that such a high level of consensus may weaken the market's constraints on policy. If the market no longer reacts negatively to aggressive rhetoric, it could incentivize riskier policy actions, increasing potential tail risks.

TACO Trading Dominates Market: Investors Bet on Trump's 'Maximum Pressure Will Eventually Back Down', Buying on Dips Becomes Mainstream Strategy

Ergo tweeted: “Using public data and chain forensics, we have attributed 432 addresses holding 317,705 BTC to likely GBTC custody activity. This total is about 50% of GBTC reported current holdings. Additional work is necessary to ID the remaining. ”

Detail

【432 addresses holding 317,000 BTC are related to GBTC custody, accounting for 50% of the total reported】Ergo tweeted: “Using public data and chain forensics, we have attributed 432 addresses holding 317,705 BTC to likely GBTC custody activity. This total is about 50% of GBTC reported current holdings. Additional work is necessary to ID the remaining. ”

432 addresses holding 317,000 BTC are related to GBTC custody, accounting for 50% of the total reported

Article

Trump Announces Son-in-Law Kushner and Envoy Greenblatt to Negotiate in Iran

EF: Plans to Sell 5,000 ETH Today for R&D Funding, Grants, and Donations

Tanker Passage Through the Strait of Hormuz Disrupted

BTC Drops Below $71,000

432 addresses holding 317,000 BTC are related to GBTC custody, accounting for 50% of the total reported

Застереження：Наведені вище матеріали не представляють позицію компанії HTX.，HTX не дає жодних торгових рекомендацій.。

Схожі статті

Усі коментарі0НовіПопулярно

Популярні теми

Схожі статті