Tether Gold (XAU₮) Attestation Released, $770M Market Cap

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-04-28Востаннє оновлено о 2025-04-28

Tether, the biggest stablecoin issuer in the world, has shared its first official report for Tether Gold (XAU₮), its token backed by gold.

The report, released at the end of Q1 2025, states that XAU₮ is backed by over 7.7 tons of gold, establishing it as the biggest tokenized gold product in the market.

The token is regulated by El Salvadoran law, making its value more comprehensible and safe. According to the report, 246,523.33 troy ounces of gold are safely deposited in Swiss vaults, backing XAU₮ on a 1:1 ratio.

As of publication time, XAU₮ was trading at $3,123 per token and thus had a total worth of $770 million. The token reached its recent peak at $3,423 on April 21, 2025, when demand for gold from around the globe surged during uncertain times in the economy.

Tether Gold (Xau₮) Hits $770M Market Cap
Tether Gold (XAU₮) hits $770M market cap | Source: x.com/Tether_to

Paolo Ardoino, the CEO of Tether, emphasized that the token is safe. He stated, “XAU₮ enables users to have access to the stability of physical gold in digital form.” The company highlighted that the value of XAU₮ is entirely backed by real gold reserves. This makes it a reliable option for investors who seek security amidst uncertain times.

XAU₮ is gaining attention as more individuals globally are demanding gold. One of the reasons is that central banks, particularly those in the BRICS nations, are increasing gold reserves to hedge against inflation and reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar.

The World Gold Council stated that in 2024, the central banks bought more than 1,000 metric tons of gold, and this helped drive gold prices up by 2024. In 2025, gold has been doing great, beating the S&P 500 by 32.6% year to date. Analysts observed that gold prices have gone up by 26.5%, but the S&P 500 has dropped by 6.1%.

Tether’s focus on XAU₮ is not simply providing a safe-haven asset for investors. The company is also targeting emerging markets where people are subject to currency devaluation or political instability.

Ardoino said, “XAU₮ is secure, easy to transfer, and fully backed by physical gold reserves on a one-to-one basis.” This provides those in these markets with access to a stable, digital representation of gold.

Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says ADA Could Reach $10



Пов'язані матеріали

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article "Why Banks Are Determined to Ban Yield-Bearing Stablecoins?" explores the ongoing debate around the U.S. cryptocurrency market structure bill (CLARITY), particularly the fierce opposition from large banks against interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks argue that such stablecoins could cause deposit outflows, but the author refutes this, explaining that funds used to purchase stablecoins like USDC ultimately flow back into the banking system as reserves held by issuers like Circle. The real concern for banks is not the total volume of deposits but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. major banks (e.g., Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase) rely heavily on "low-interest banking," where transaction deposits (used for payments, transfers) pay near-zero interest, creating a significant spread between deposit rates and the Fed’s benchmark rate. This model generates massive profits—over $360 billion annually from interest differentials and transaction fees. Stablecoins directly compete with transaction deposits by offering similar utility (payments, settlements). If stablecoins can generate yield, users may shift funds from bank transaction accounts to stablecoins to earn higher returns. While the money remains in the banking system (as stablecoin reserves), it moves from low-cost transaction deposits to higher-yield instruments, squeezing bank profit margins and reducing fee income. Thus, banks oppose yield-bearing stablecoins to protect their lucrative low-cost deposit base and maintain control over profit distribution, making it a central issue in the CLARITY legislative battle.

marsbit7 хв тому

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

marsbit7 хв тому

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article explores why U.S. banks are strongly opposing interest-bearing stablecoins, despite claims that such assets could cause bank deposit outflows. It argues that funds flowing into stablecoins like USDC do not leave the banking system—instead, they are held as reserves in highly liquid assets like cash or Treasury bills, which eventually return to banks. The real concern for large banks is not the total volume of deposits, but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. megabanks rely heavily on low-cost transactional deposits (used for payments and transfers), which pay near-zero interest. These deposits allow banks to profit from the spread between the Fed funds rate and what they pay depositors, as well as from transaction fees. Interest-bearing stablecoins threaten this model. They offer similar transactional utility but also provide yield, incentivizing users to move funds out of traditional bank transactional accounts. While the money may return to the banking system, it would likely be placed in higher-yielding deposit accounts, increasing banks’ funding costs. Additionally, stablecoins could disrupt banks’ fee income from payment services. The core issue is profit redistribution: stablecoins—especially those offering yield—could reduce banks’ low-cost funding advantage and erode their transaction revenue, explaining the fierce opposition to interest-bearing models in proposed legislation like the CLARITY Act.

Odaily星球日报24 хв тому

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

Odaily星球日报24 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片