DAO Maker(DAO) Regular Invest

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

DeFi platform Summer.fi is shutting down after seven years due to a $6 million exploit on July 6th that drained critical liquidity and the team's capital, leaving no financial runway for recovery. Despite rapid initial growth reaching $200 million in TVL, the security failure in its Lazy Summer Protocol caused a collapse in user confidence and activity. The platform will remain available until August 31st. While the Lazy Summer DAO is working to restore user withdrawals, the incident underscores that in DeFi, lasting success requires robust security and maintaining trust, not just attracting capital.

Changxin Technology: A Cyclical Stock at the Peak On July 27, 2026, Changxin Technology topped the A-share market with a market capitalization of 3.28 trillion yuan, surging 465% on its first trading day. The company, which lost 16.3 billion yuan in 2023, reported an estimated net profit of 50-57 billion yuan for the first half of 2026. Its dramatic reversal mirrors the volatile DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) cycle. The DRAM industry is inherently cyclical, with booms and busts every 3-4 years. This is due to product standardization and a significant time lag in supply adjustment. When prices rise, manufacturers expand capacity, but new production takes 2-3 years to come online, often leading to oversupply and price crashes when demand cools. Changxin's performance perfectly tracks this cycle. It recorded deep losses in 2023-2024 during the industry downturn, turned its first annual profit in 2025, and saw profits skyrocket in Q1 2026. This surge is primarily price-driven. The AI boom has led major players like Samsung and SK Hynix to shift 70-80% of new capacity to high-margin HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), creating a severe shortage and price explosion in general-purpose DRAM markets where Changxin competes. However, a massive global capacity expansion is underway. The top three manufacturers have announced nearly $70 billion in capital expenditure for 2026. Changxin itself plans to expand from three to seven 12-inch wafer fabs. This investment will translate into significant new supply in 2-3 years. While DRAM prices are expected to remain high through 2026-2027, price growth is already slowing, and a potential downturn is forecast for around 2028 as new capacity ramps up. A key challenge for Changxin is catching up in the critical HBM segment. While it has delivered HBM3 samples, leaders are already mass-producing more advanced HBM3E. Success in HBM is crucial for gaining true cyclical resilience. In conclusion, Changxin is a commendable company that has broken foreign monopolies in DRAM. Its long-term growth narrative—driven by import substitution and AI—is valid. Yet, its current valuation of 5-6x forward P/E, typical for a cyclical stock at its peak, suggests much future growth is already priced in. AI may extend the current cycle but cannot eliminate the industry's inherent volatility. For investors, the critical question is preparedness for the inevitable downturn when the cycle turns.

Orbs has launched OIP-9, its first official community governance proposal to establish the Orbs DAO. If approved, it will create the initial governance layer, granting qualified members control over specific protocol aspects and advancing decentralization. After years of development, this proposal marks the next phase, formalizing community oversight through a methodical approach balancing security and decentralization. Tokens staked in the Orbs Proof-of-Stake contract will be eligible for governance via proposals and snapshot voting, with decisions executed through DAO-controlled multisig wallets. Initially, the DAO will supervise key network parameters, including PoS architecture, Guardian approvals, and significant protocol changes. The proposal adopts a progressive model, gradually increasing community responsibility. Future proposals may address protocol revenue, treasury management, and tokenomics. An emergency mechanism allows the core team to act if urgently needed for network stability, subject to subsequent DAO approval. This governance foundation will also support the next roadmap phase, including proposed Season 1 tokenomics, enabling future community decisions on protocol economics and ecosystem growth.

A GSR market executive highlights a critical vulnerability in DAO treasury management: nearly 70% of DAO treasury assets remain concentrated in their own native tokens. This creates a structurally pro-cyclical risk where, during a market downturn, protocols face a triple threat: plummeting treasury value, sharp declines in protocol revenue, and collapsing on-chain activity simultaneously. The article observes that projects typically seek downside protection too late, when volatility and option costs are already high. It advocates for proactive treasury structuring, separating operational reserves (in stable assets) from longer-term holdings and employing hedging strategies like zero-cost collars to lock in a value floor without selling tokens. This approach, establishing risk management policies before markets weaken, is presented as key to preserving operational runway and continuing development through bear cycles. GSR positions itself as a provider of OTC execution, structured derivatives, and treasury risk management solutions for foundations and DAOs.