Zoomex X Space Recap With Didi Hamann and the World Cup Trading Panel

TheNewsCrypto2026-07-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Zoomex hosted the second episode of its World Cup Impact Pledge X Space, featuring Champions League winner Didi Hamann and traders Mario, Crank, and Joseph. Hamann shared football insights, comparing team dynamics to trading. He highlighted that the hardest teams to face are those with "nothing to lose," drawing parallels to undisciplined traders. He stressed consistency, citing his own role: playing the same way whether 3-0 up or down, akin to sticking to a trading plan. The discussion covered the necessity of defensive balance for championships, mirroring risk management in trading where stop losses act as a "last line of defence." Hamann predicted Brazil to win the World Cup, backed by coach Angelotti's man-management, and identified Japan and South Africa as dangerous underdogs. He praised an 18-year-old Moroccan midfielder's exceptional composure. The traders emphasized emotionless discipline, with Crank stating the core choice is between wanting "to be right, or to be rich." Assets were mapped to teams: Bitcoin to Brazil (the benchmark) and Ethereum to France (technically foundational). The session underscored that success in both fields depends on maintaining structure and process under pressure, not on emotional reactions. Zoomex's charity pledge continues, with donations tied to guest predictions.

Zoomex hosted the second episode of its World Cup Edition X Space as part of the Zoomex World Cup Impact Pledge, bringing together Champions League winner Didi Hamann and three traders: Mario from Forex Trading & Investing, Crank, and Joseph. Fernando Aranda hosted the session, which ran across World Cup analysis, the German squad debate, career philosophy, and the kind of crypto-to-football comparisons that only hold together when neither side takes them too seriously.

The session continued the five-part charity initiative launched in the first episode. Across five World Cup episodes, Zoomex is committing 1,000 USDT per episode to a charity of each football guest’s choosing, rising by an additional 5,000 USDT if the guest’s World Cup prediction proves correct. Hamann backed Japan to beat Sweden and nominated a homeless support charity in Munich, a cause he backs regularly.

Nothing to Lose. Nothing to Fear.

Fernando opened by asking which is harder, a match you must win, or a match you cannot afford to lose. Hamann said the question had never been put to him that way before, and his answer repositioned the difficulty entirely.

“I always say in football, the hardest thing in football is when you play against a team that has nothing to lose. If that makes sense, because we’ve seen a lot of upsets. When a team has nothing to lose, they’re the most dangerous because they just go for it. And if they lose, they lose. It doesn’t matter. But if they win, they can win all or gain everything.”

That is a different pressure to manage than needing to win. A team chasing a must-win result still operates inside a calculation. A team that only stands to gain has discarded the calculation entirely. From that point of view, he said, having to win is probably the easier of the two situations to be in.

Morocco against Italy was the recent example the panel kept returning to. South Africa against South Korea was another. “Nobody gave them a chance, and here they are in the last 32.”

Crank had watched the same dynamic unfold in markets many times. Traders who enter without a prebuilt plan are playing from the same emotional state as a team with nothing to lose: exposed, reactive, and without the protection that structure provides. The difference is that in trading, the cost of that freedom comes directly out of your account.

The Game Does Not Change at 3-0 Down.

As a holding midfielder, Hamann gave himself one instruction regardless of what the scoreboard said, and he never deviated from it.

“I always felt in my position I couldn’t afford to give the ball away because we have players who need to take risks. They give the ball away more often naturally because they have to take chances. And I always felt in my position I had to play the same way whether we are 3-0 up or 3-0 down because I wasn’t the one changing games, scoring goals or setting up goals. It wasn’t my job and I couldn’t do it. But we had players to do that.”

The players around him were Steven Gerrard, Luis Garcia, Cissé, Baros. His job was to win the ball, protect the structure, and put it in their feet as quickly as possible. Getting carried away when the scoreline was comfortable, or trying to do things that were not in his nature when 3-0 down, both produced the same result: a team that had lost its shape.

Istanbul in 2005 is the case study. Hamann came on at half-time, three goals down against an AC Milan side regarded at the time as the best club team in the world. He was warming up on the touchline when the second half was about to begin, and his read was simple.

“I was sure, warming up at half-time, because obviously I came on at half-time, I was sure if we scored one, I’m sure we scored a second one. And then if it’s 3-2, even the most experienced teams do make mistakes. And then after that first goal, the stadium came, there were 40,000 or 50,000 Liverpool fans. And I think AC Milan all of a sudden thought, maybe it’s not over.”

Three goals in six minutes. Penalties after that. He acknowledged luck was part of it, but the more durable point was that the process did not change. Win the ball. Do not concede the wrong goal. Give the ball to the people with the license to take risks.

Cissé had been a guest the previous week and described the same locker room from the other side. Joseph in this session brought the parallel into trading directly: “I always start with a plan, like a coach picks his starting eleven before the match. But if the market moves against me, don’t wait too long. Just like a coach, make a quick substitution when the team is losing control. I exit my position early instead of hoping for a comeback. Sticking to a plan is good, but being too stubborn can really hurt you. At the end of the day, the best traders are not the ones who are always right. They are the ones who know how to manage risks when they are wrong.”

Attack Is Not Enough.

Fernando raised the old argument: attack wins games, defence wins championships. Hamann agreed, then sharpened it.

“It’s almost impossible to outscore teams on a regular basis. I do think just attack won’t win. You need a good defence, you need a balance in your team, and a good-holding midfielder. You might get to the quarters, you might get to the semis, you might even get to the final. But I don’t think you win the whole thing.”

The Barcelona side that most people reach for as the purest attacking team of the modern era, Messi, Suárez, Neymar, still had Puyol and Piqué in central defence and Busquets holding midfield. That Busquets point is the sharper one: the best attacking team of the generation was built around arguably the best defensive midfielder of the same generation. France in this tournament ticks the same boxes from the other direction. Mbappé at the front, two of the best centre-backs in the world behind him, a holding structure that does not give teams the space to breathe.

Real Madrid is the present-day example of what happens when the balance is off. The attacking quality is not in question. The defensive midfield structure lags, and at the tournament stage, one bad half against the right opponent ends everything.

On the type of error he finds hardest to watch, Hamann drew a precise distinction. “I don’t mind the technical fault or mistake. You know, if a ball bounces, if you misplace a pass, it shouldn’t happen, but it happens. But what I don’t like is when teams, especially in the Champions League or now in the World Cup, make mental mistakes. You see it all the time when they give the ball away in areas where they shouldn’t play, where they get a bit too smart and think they get away with it. You shouldn’t make a mistake because you don’t think. This is what drives me crazy.”

A technical error can be explained by the surface, by fatigue, by a fraction of a second lost to distraction. A mental error has no comparable excuse. At the highest level, with everything on the line, the only reason to stop thinking is overconfidence.

The trading panel had the same split. Mario put it cleanly: “The market is the man and we follow the market. It doesn’t make sense not to change your view if the market is against you. You only lose money when you do it like that.” The stop loss is the instrument that enforces honesty when the mind is arguing for one more minute, one more candle, one more reason to stay in. Mario gave it the most useful name of the session: “The stop loss is like being a good defender. Maybe like the libero. The last man. If you kick him, then you get a red card. That’s the stop loss. Last line of defence.”

Joseph extended the metaphor into position sizing: “It’s just like a football defence. If your back line is not organised, even a great goalkeeper cannot save you every time. In trading, protecting your capital is like protecting your goal. If you defend well, you will always have another chance to win.”

Brazil to Win. Angelotti to Manage.

Hamann had made his tournament pick before the first game was played, and he was not changing it now.

“I said at the start of the tournament, I said Brazil, because I think it’s a long tournament. It’s 48 teams now, so it’s a week, 10 days longer than it was before. And there will be at times, there will be a few problems within the team, and you need somebody to handle it and manage it. And I think in Angelotti, they’ve got the perfect man.”

The best defence. A very good attack. An open question in midfield. And the right coach for a campaign that will test squads not just tactically but in terms of internal management. His second breath went to France. “I stick with Brazil, but I think it will take a very, very good team to beat France.”

Germany occupies a different kind of space in Hamann’s thinking, somewhere between professional assessment and obvious personal investment. The read on the squad was honest. Undaf, used so far as the impact substitute, should stay there.

“He’s probably the best sub, the super sub of this tournament. He’s probably the best player coming on in this tournament. So why change it? Because everybody knows when he comes on, there’s a boost going around the ground. There’s a boost going through the team and everybody goes, oh, he’s coming on. We’ve got a chance.”

That psychological effect disappears the moment he becomes expected from the first whistle. The weapon works because it has been withheld. Sané has not delivered on the first two games. Wirth is settling in. Musiala, five months back from a serious injury, has been anonymous by his own standards. Schlotterbeck’s absence has cost the defensive structure its balance with the left foot. Mecha has been the best German player in the tournament and may emerge from it as one of the most watched midfielders in Europe.

On the group stage as a concept, Hamann was pragmatic. “You just have to get out of the group. Nobody talks. Once you get to the last 32, last 16, nobody cares how you got out of the group, how you played in the group. That’s when it matters.”

Crank’s read on the Bitcoin market was built with the same long-cycle logic. He described taking short positions near the top, closing them on the way down, and watching the four-year cycle move toward what he sees as a floor. “Bitcoin is exactly where it should be. My levels right now are golden pocket between 54 and 57. I’m waiting for one more big capitulation, scare you pretty bad, and then we can, based off of four-year cycle theory, start our accumulation phase and bottoming out, which for me is between 41 to 46,000.” Mario put his own range at 43,000 to 45,000 and believed the bottom would arrive within 100 days of the session. Joseph agreed with the range. The disagreement was mostly about timing.

Dark Horses and an 18-Year-Old Who Plays Like a Veteran

Among the nations that had caught his attention, Hamann pointed first to the home contingent. Canada had been exceptional. Mexico against England at the Azteca, with altitude and a full home crowd, would be nobody’s idea of a comfortable draw. “That won’t be an easy game. If they play Mexico City, the Azteca with altitude, it’s not an easy thing to beat them there.”

South Africa had made the sharpest impression. “The way they played yesterday. It was absolutely brilliant. Nobody gave them a chance, and here they are in the last 32.”

Japan was his most dangerous selection from outside the traditional powers. “I think Japan is really a dangerous team. Beat Germany four years ago in Qatar. I think they beat Spain as well. They’ve got that vision. They want to, I think before 2050, they want to be world champions. They want to win the World Cup. Not sure it’s going to happen this year. But this is a nation that improves year after year after year.”

Ivory Coast came up without prompting. “The first 60 minutes against Germany, I think they played exceptionally well. Germany was second best in every aspect.” A team that outplays Germany for an hour in a major tournament is not an accident. They are a dangerous team going forward.

On Morocco, Hamann pointed to an 18-year-old central midfielder without being asked. He had heard about the player before the tournament. He saw him play. Then he looked up the age again.

“Brilliant. 18 years of age, the maturity he plays with, I couldn’t believe. I heard of him before, then I saw him, then I had to look again. How old is he? 18 years. Because usually, central midfielders, they get into the best age, 22, 24, because experience counts for a lot. But the way he plays, how composed. At 18 years of age, unbelievable.”

The Hardest Opponents. The Best Teammates.

On the midfielder who made his career most uncomfortable, Hamann did not hesitate. There were players across the years who tried to get inside his head, who wanted him in a conversation on the pitch, who looked for ways to make him react. “I never spoke to the opposition and very rarely spoke to the referee. So that didn’t really bother me.”

The frustration with Patrick Vieira was entirely different: it was purely about quality.

“The most frustrating was probably the best one I played against because he was like a Rolls-Royce. He was quick, he was strong, he could pass, he played in an exceptional team with Arsenal. It was no joy playing against him because he was so good. For me, he was the best and I had never fun playing against him.”

That Arsenal side was the backdrop that made it worse. Vieira in an average team is one problem. Vieira in one of the best club sides he faced across his entire career is a different afternoon entirely.

On the other side of the ledger, the question of superstars and teams produced one of the clearest statements of the session. Messi, Mbappé, Ronaldo, Haaland: are they the reason teams win, or is it the other way around?

“It’s got to be the team. But I think all these guys, they all know that they couldn’t succeed without the team. On your own, you’re nothing. As good as they are, but you need 10 other players. And I think the best example was the last World Cup, where really 10 players worked for Messi and then he made the difference. And that’s how it should be, because you need to cover all the bases as a team.”

On the next German superstar, Hamann was direct. “I said he’s too good to fail because it’s the best player I’ve seen in the last 20 years in a German shirt.” Wirth had a difficult debut season at Liverpool. A new manager changes the conditions. Mecha he views as deeply undervalued. “He’s not a flash player, but he does the things nobody wants to do. He makes it really very efficient. He’s got pace, he’s got physicality, he can score a goal. I think Mecha was very underrated in the last few years. We might even see him at a huge club after the World Cup because now everybody took note of him.”

No Emotions. No Exceptions.

Fernando drew the bridge between the two halves of the session: coaches change systems mid-game when the plan stops working, and traders change positions when the market moves against them. The panel each described how they handle that moment.

Crank’s answer was the most absolute. “No emotions in day trading. You are up against robots. Within these algorithms, emotions do not exist. And anybody that trades for a living or is just getting started needs to understand that you’re going to be so numb that you do the same thing every single day. But it’s a system. And once you have it to where it works in your favour and you have it dialled in, you don’t make those adjustments.”

His summary of the choice at the centre of trading was the most direct line of the session: “Do you want to be right, or do you want to be rich?”

Mario agreed without qualification. “No emotions in trading. That’s the worst thing you can do. You have to just shut down your emotions. Just stick to your plan. Every day doing the same thing that works. And emotions don’t work.”

Joseph described what happens after a stop loss gets hit, a moment most traders find more disorienting than the loss itself. “Getting stopped out and watching the price go back up, that’s one of the most annoying things in trading. But I have a personal rule: after a stop loss, I take a short break, maybe 15 to 30 minutes before opening any new trade. This stops me from revenge trading. It’s like a player who misses a penalty. The best one would take a breath before playing on, not react emotionally. Every loss is a lesson, but revenge trading usually turns one mistake into two.”

Crank closed on the cycle and what it means for the audience watching right now. “Now’s the time more than ever to exit out all the noise and really focus because this is where you separate the boys and girls from the men and women. Be violent with your education right now because this is where lives are changed.”

Which Team Is Bitcoin?

Fernando asked the panel to map the major assets to national teams in the tournament.

Brazil collected the Bitcoin allocation from most of the panel. The longest track record, the deepest global fanbase, the benchmark that everything else gets measured against regardless of current charts. Joseph assigned it to Argentina, with a specific reason: the 2022 World Cup, where ten players organised themselves entirely in service of one, and the one delivered. That, in his view, is the most accurate representation of how Bitcoin’s entire ecosystem functions around a single thesis.

France drew Ethereum from most voices, technically foundational, expected to perform at the highest level, measured against a standard that was set years ago and has not yet been surpassed. Portugal went to Solana: fast, direct, talent-driven, with a single player whose presence changes every calculation. Mario broke from the group and pointed to Spain or the Netherlands as the surprise allocations, teams that could outperform expectations the way an asset can when its narrative catches up with its fundamentals.

On which of the major tournament favourites exits earliest, France drew the most votes, followed by Germany. Mario, thirty years a German football supporter, crossed his fingers rather than naming names.

The Lesson From the Zoomex Space

The thread connecting both halves of the session was what holds together when the situation changes and the original plan no longer applies.

Hamann’s philosophy as a midfielder, do not vary the process at 3-0 up or 3-0 down, is the same discipline the traders described as the line between consistent performance and emotional reaction. It is not about suppressing the awareness that the situation has changed. It is about having decided in advance what you do when it does.

The 2005 Champions League final is not a story about hope or momentum or the magic of a particular night. It is a story about a team that kept doing the right things in the right order while three goals down, until the conditions changed. “If there were no mistakes, there wouldn’t be any goals,” Hamann said. That applies to both sides of the ball. The team that keeps its structure in a crisis does not create the opening. It creates the conditions for the opening to appear.

Crank’s question applies equally. In football and in markets, the answer to the question of whether you want to be right or rich determines how you behave when the scoreline, or the chart, tells you something you do not want to hear.

The Zoomex World Cup Impact Pledge continues across three more episodes, each with a new football guest, a new charity selection, and a prediction on record. Brazil is going to win the World Cup. Didi Hamann said so, and the charity pool for Munich’s homeless depends on Japan clearing the first hurdle.

About Zoomex

Founded in 2021, Zoomex is a global cryptocurrency trading platform with over 3 million users across more than 35 countries and regions, offering 600+ trading pairs. Guided by its core values of “Simple × User-Friendly × Fast,” Zoomex is committed to fairness, integrity, and transparency in delivering a high-performance, low-barrier, trustworthy trading experience.

As an official partner of the Haas F1 Team and global brand ambassador partner of goalkeeper Emiliano Martínez, Zoomex brings the same focus on speed, precision, and discipline from the racetrack and the pitch to trading. The platform holds regulatory licenses including Canada MSB, U.S. MSB, U.S. NFA, and Australia AUSTRAC, and has passed security audits conducted by Hacken.

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this Press Release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommends our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this Press Release.

TagsPress ReleaseZoomex

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to Didi Hamann in the Zoomex X Space session, which situation in football is harder to face: a match you must win, or a match you cannot afford to lose?

ADidi Hamann stated that the hardest situation is playing against a team that has nothing to lose. He explained that such a team is the most dangerous because they play with freedom and have everything to gain, whereas a team under pressure to win is still operating within a calculative framework.

QWhat was the core philosophy Didi Hamann applied to his role as a holding midfielder, regardless of the score?

AHamann's philosophy was to never change his approach based on the scoreline. Whether his team was 3-0 up or 3-0 down, his job remained the same: to avoid giving the ball away, protect the team's structure, and quickly distribute the ball to the creative, attacking players who were tasked with taking risks and changing the game.

QWhich national team did Didi Hamann predict to win the World Cup, and who did he name as the perfect manager for that team?

AHamann predicted Brazil to win the World Cup. He stated that in Carlo Ancelotti, Brazil has the perfect manager to handle the challenges of a long tournament, managing squad dynamics and problems that inevitably arise.

QWhat key trading discipline did the panelists Mario, Crank, and Joseph emphasize, drawing a parallel to football?

AThe traders emphasized the absolute necessity of eliminating emotions from trading. They compared it to a disciplined system in football, stating that successful trading requires sticking to a pre-defined plan (like a coach's strategy), using stop-losses as a defensive mechanism, and avoiding reactive, emotional decisions like revenge trading after a loss.

QWhat is the Zoomex World Cup Impact Pledge, as mentioned in the article?

AThe Zoomex World Cup Impact Pledge is a five-part charity initiative. For each World Cup-themed X Space episode, Zoomex commits 1,000 USDT to a charity chosen by the football guest. The donation increases by an additional 5,000 USDT if the guest's World Cup prediction proves correct. In this episode, Didi Hamann backed Japan to beat Sweden and nominated a homeless support charity in Munich.

İlgili Okumalar

A Year Consumes a Solid-State Drive: Codex Log Bug Slammed as 'Slopware'

OpenAI's flagship AI coding tool, Codex, was found to have a critical bug causing its feedback logging system to silently and rapidly wear out users' SSDs. A developer reported that Codex was writing approximately 640 TB of data per year to a local SQLite database (`logs_2.sqlite`) through a constant cycle of inserting and immediately deleting log entries, primarily at the verbose TRACE level. While the database file itself remained around 1 GB, the underlying write-amplification from SQLite's WAL mechanism meant the physical SSD endured the full write load. This was enough to exceed the typical 600 TBW endurance rating of a consumer SSD within a year. The root cause was a hardcoded default logging level (`Level::TRACE`) in the configuration, which overrode any user attempts to reduce logging via environment variables. Analysis showed that over 96% of the logged data—including noisy WebSocket packet dumps and repeated system file events—was useless debug information. The issue, which had at least nine related bug reports in the Codex repository, remained latent because it didn't visibly consume disk space, only silently accumulated write cycles. After the report gained traction on Hacker News, OpenAI merged fixes estimated to reduce writes by about 85%. However, even post-fix, the tool would still write an estimated 96 TB annually. The incident sparked broader criticism of "slopware" in AI-assisted development tools, highlighting a lack of resource budgeting for disk, CPU, and memory in always-on agent software, and a reliance on modern hardware to mask inefficient code. Competing tools like Claude Code were noted to have similar issues.

marsbit2 dk önce

A Year Consumes a Solid-State Drive: Codex Log Bug Slammed as 'Slopware'

marsbit2 dk önce

Robinhood Chain Mainnet Launch Ignites Industry Shockwaves: Rally of Top Protocols, but Leaves dYdX in a Deep Pit

Robinhood's launch of its Layer 2 blockchain, Robinhood Chain, and a suite of new crypto products has significantly impacted the market. The announcement, made ahead of its Q2 earnings, caused the company's stock to rise 8.35%. The chain, built on Arbitrum Orbit, aims to be an institutional-grade, AI-native infrastructure optimized for Real World Assets (RWA). Key product launches include tokenized stocks available globally via various DEXs, perpetual contracts with fee incentives, and a decentralized lending product called Robinhood Earn offering yields on USDG stablecoin. The company is also expanding its AI trading tools to crypto. The move has attracted major protocols like Uniswap and Chainlink to its ecosystem. However, a partnership with dYdX to launch a new DEX called Arcus on Robinhood Chain sparked controversy. The dYdX community expressed concerns that the core team's focus on this new, independent platform could divert resources and liquidity away from the existing dYdX Chain, potentially diluting the value of the DYDX token. Despite assurances from dYdX's founder about shared interests and potential future token allocations for the dYdX community, the DYDX token price dropped roughly 40.7% following the news. Amidst slowing crypto revenue growth, Robinhood is leveraging its large user base and financial expertise to expand globally and transform from an internet broker into a broader financial gateway through its new blockchain initiative.

链捕手3 dk önce

Robinhood Chain Mainnet Launch Ignites Industry Shockwaves: Rally of Top Protocols, but Leaves dYdX in a Deep Pit

链捕手3 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Credit Market Leveraged by Stablecoins, Stuck in Off-Chain Risk Control

**Stablecoins Fueling Trillion-Dollar Private Credit Market, Hampered by Off-Chain Risk Management** This article examines how interest-bearing stablecoins are replicating the business model of money market funds to democratize access to the $2 trillion private credit market, while highlighting the significant risks posed by inadequate off-chain risk controls. Historically, private credit investments had high minimums (e.g., $1 million+) due to costly due diligence and loan servicing. Stablecoins like Apollo's ACRED and Figure's YLDS are bridging this gap. They tokenize institutional credit funds, allowing small investors to gain exposure and enabling new functionalities like using these tokens as collateral in DeFi for leveraged yield. The on-chain private credit market has grown 15x in a year to $5.87 billion, yet remains a tiny fraction of the global total. However, the core challenge is not blockchain technology but managing the inherent risks of lending, which occur off-chain. The failure of Goldfinch, a pioneer in on-chain private credit, serves as a stark warning. It raised funds in crypto (USDC) to lend to small businesses in markets like Kenya and Nigeria. While smart contracts handled fund distribution, critical functions—local due diligence, monitoring loan use, and debt collection—relied on off-chain partners. A major breach, where a local partner misappropriated nearly 40% of funds, went undetected for months. When borrowers defaulted, crypto depositors had no effective legal recourse or means to seize assets, leaving $56 million trapped in non-performing loans with a projected 8-15 year recovery timeline. The article concludes that tokenization addresses only 10% of the credit business—the distribution. The remaining 90%—rigorous risk assessment and collection infrastructure—is expensive and localization-dependent. Without solving these fundamental off-chain challenges, the sector risks repeating Goldfinch's collapse.

Foresight News47 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Credit Market Leveraged by Stablecoins, Stuck in Off-Chain Risk Control

Foresight News47 dk önce

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

Solana has formally launched its on-chain governance system, empowering token holders and validators with a more open and decentralized way to influence major protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now conducted entirely on-chain using the new Solana Governance Proposals (SGP) framework, supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification. Validators with at least 100,000 SOL in delegated stake can submit an SGP. To proceed to a formal vote, a proposal must first gain support from at least 15% of the network's total staked SOL, ensuring only ideas with significant backing move forward. SGPs serve a distinct purpose from the technical Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs). While SIMDs focus on *how* to implement protocol upgrades, SGPs determine *whether* the broader ecosystem believes a proposal should proceed, via an on-chain, stake-weighted vote. This separation allows core developers to continue building effectively while reserving community-wide votes for impactful decisions. A key feature grants delegators greater control: they can now override their validator's governance vote. If a validator votes against a delegator's preference or abstains, the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana's governance portal. The voting process is secured using Merkle proofs to verify participant stakes against an on-chain consensus snapshot. With this implementation, Solana aims to broaden community participation in governance without hindering development, combining decentralized decision-making with efficient protocol evolution.

TheNewsCrypto1 saat önce

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

TheNewsCrypto1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片