Zero inflows, weak demand: Did VanEck’s AVAX ETF debut fall flat?

ambcrypto2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

VanEck's spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF launched in early 2026 to a deeply negative market reception, recording zero inflows and only $330K in trading volume. This performance starkly contrasts with other recent altcoin ETFs, such as Bitwise's Solana ETF which saw $69M in inflows and Ripple's XRP ETF which attracted $245M. The AVAX ETF debut coincided with extreme bearish sentiment, reflected in a low Fear and Greed Index and stagnant open interest below $200M. AVAX's price remained weak, struggling near its late 2025 range of $11-$15. The lackluster response raises doubts about near-term bullish momentum and increases the risk of a deeper correction below $10 if negative sentiment persists.

Crypto market sentiment is deeply negative in early 2026 and even worse for some select altcoins.

This was illustrated by the recent launch of VanEck’s U.S. spot Avalanche [AVAX] ETF, which saw zero inflows and paltry $330K in trading volume.

For comparison, the Bitwise Solana [SOL] ETF went live on the 29th of October, just after the market-wide crash. Yet it recorded $69 million in inflows and $58 million in trading volume.

In mid-November, Ripple’s first spot XRP ETF, launched by Canary Capital, saw $245 million in inflows on its launch day. Chainlink’s Grayscale LINK ETF also attracted $41 million, making the first-ever AVAX ETF’s zero-inflow debut a subdued reception compared to other altcoin ETFs.

Whether this was just a slow start or a reality check for other altcoin ETFs remained to be seen. Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart said the top 20 crypto assets will likely see at least one single ETF, but was more “bullish on index products.”

AVAX’s debut met with ‘extreme fear’

Even so, the debut was met with ‘extreme fear,’ which remained slightly unchanged as of press time. Notably, the altcoin’s Fear and Greed Index dropped to 20 during the launch and slightly improved to a ‘fear’ level of 29.

In other words, speculators were extremely bearish on the altcoin, and the ETF debut made no huge difference.

A look at AVAX’s Open Interest (OI) or overall speculative appetite across the Futures market painted the same picture. Since the crash on the 10th of October, AVAX’s OI has fallen off a cliff from nearly $1 billion and has remained stagnant below $200 million.

In other words, demand for the altcoin was flat across spot and Futures markets. On the price charts, AVAX only bounced 2% but still struggled near its late 2025 price range of $11-$15.

The extended selling pressure in mid-December eased at the range lows of $11. Bulls attempted to defend the level once again this week.

However, the muted price reaction to the ETF update raised doubts about whether the support will hold and boost bulls to push toward $13 or $15.

A break below the range would reinforce a deeper correction, increasing the odds of a dip below $10 if the bearish sentiment persists.


Final Thoughts

  • Unlike the recent altcoin ETF debuts, the first-ever AVAX ETF attracted zero inflows and $330k in trading volume
  • Speculative interest has been flat for the past few months, while sentiment has soured deeply.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the inflow and trading volume figures for VanEck's U.S. spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF at its debut?

AVanEck's U.S. spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF saw zero inflows and a paltry $330K in trading volume at its debut.

QHow did the performance of the AVAX ETF compare to the Bitwise Solana ETF and Canary Capital's XRP ETF?

AThe Bitwise Solana ETF recorded $69 million in inflows and $58 million in trading volume, while Canary Capital's XRP ETF saw $245 million in inflows on its launch day. In stark contrast, the AVAX ETF had zero inflows and minimal trading volume.

QWhat was the state of market sentiment for AVAX at the time of the ETF launch, as indicated by the Fear and Greed Index?

AThe altcoin's Fear and Greed Index dropped to a level of 20, indicating 'extreme fear,' during the launch. It only slightly improved to a 'fear' level of 29 by press time.

QWhat does the data for Avalanche's Open Interest (OI) reveal about speculative demand?

ASince the market crash on October 10th, AVAX's Open Interest (OI) has plummeted from nearly $1 billion and has remained stagnant below $200 million, indicating a severe lack of speculative appetite in the Futures market.

QWhat was the price action of AVAX following the ETF launch, and what are the key support and resistance levels mentioned?

AAVAX's price only bounced 2% following the ETF news and continued to struggle near its late 2025 price range of $11-$15. The $11 level was a key support, and a break below it could lead to a deeper correction toward prices below $10.

İlgili Okumalar

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片