ZachXBT Reveals Identity of Cryptocurrency Scammer Involved in $5M Theft

cryptonews.ru2026-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

ZachXBT, a blockchain investigator, has identified Tiffany Milanovich as a threat actor linked to at least $5 million in cryptocurrency thefts. Milanovich's scam involves impersonating customer support staff from centralized exchanges or hardware wallet services, tricking victims over the phone into granting access to their funds. Her associate, using aliases like "bled" and "harm," creates phishing websites mimicking login pages for crypto services. When victims enter their credentials, the criminals gain access to their wallets. In one June incident, a victim lost $1.2 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum from a Trezor hardware wallet after being tricked by a fake representative. ZachXBT notes that Milanovich publicly boasts about her illicit gains on her Telegram channel, mocking victims and flaunting luxury purchases and casino bets funded with stolen money. She was exposed after her associate, John Daghita (previously implicated by ZachXBT in a $46 million theft), leaked her real name online following a dispute.

ZachXBT detailed how Milanovich called victims on the phone, impersonating customer support staff from centralized cryptocurrency exchanges or hardware wallet services, deceitfully convincing people to grant access to their funds. The blockchain investigator wrote that the accomplice, using the aliases 'bled' and 'harm', created websites mimicking the login pages of crypto services. When a victim clicked a link from a phishing email and entered their credentials on such a site, the perpetrators gained access to their cryptocurrency wallet.

In June, one victim lost $1.2 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum from a Trezor hardware wallet. The scammers sent an email posing as an employee of the crypto service BitcoinIRA named Patricia Massi. The victim was tricked into revealing access to the wallet—and all funds were stolen. ZachXBT tracked that the majority of the stolen assets remain unmoved to this day. Earlier, in October 2025, the fraudsters misappropriated $500,000 worth of Bitcoin, stolen from a hacked account on the Coinbase exchange. This case caught ZachXBT's attention because for Milanovich, the amount of stolen money seemed too small, a fact she publicly complained about and even posted a screenshot of the withdrawal transaction.

The on-chain detective recounted how, after draining victims' accounts, the woman mocked the deceived individuals in her Telegram channel. Milanovich posts photos and videos, flaunting expensive purchases and talking about using the stolen money for casino bets. The online investigator asserts she specifically edits some videos to exaggerate the scale of the thefts.

1/ Meet Tiffany Milanovich, a US based threat actor tied to at least $5M in thefts from hardware wallet and centralized exchange support impersonation scams.

She's recorded herself taunting victims on calls after draining their funds.

Tiffany openly flaunts luxury purchases,... pic.twitter.com/mRMD4yhWiz

— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) August 10, 2026

ZachXBT wrote that he discovered a connection between Milanovich and John Daghita, whom he named in January 2026 as involved in the theft of over $46 million in crypto assets, which were seized by US authorities. In March, Daghita was detained on the island of Saint Martin—the man gave himself away during a dispute in a messenger app. Earlier, Milanovich recorded a phone call with Daghita and made it publicly available. In retaliation, Daghita published her real name in his Telegram channel, which allowed the blockchain detective to track down the scammer.

Recently, ZachXBT suggested abandoning the use of Ledger hardware wallets. In his opinion, frequent Ledger updates change the interface and could disrupt the device's basic functions.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main fraudulent scheme described by ZachXBT involving Tiffany Milanovich?

AZachXBT describes a scheme where Tiffany Milanovich impersonates support staff from centralized crypto exchanges or hardware wallet services (like Trezor and BitcoinIRA) over the phone. Her accomplice, using the pseudonyms 'bled' and 'harm', creates phishing websites that mimic legitimate crypto service login pages. Victims are tricked into entering their credentials, giving the scammers access to their cryptocurrency wallets.

QHow did the scammer's public behavior help reveal their identity according to the article?

ATiffany Milanovich's public behavior, specifically complaining on social media about a $500,000 theft being too small and publicly sharing a screenshot of the transaction, initially drew ZachXBT's attention. Later, her accomplice John Daghita retaliated after a leaked phone call by publishing her real name in his Telegram channel, which ultimately allowed the blockchain detective to track her down.

QWhat is one example of a victim's loss detailed in the report?

AOne victim lost $1.2 million worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum from a Trezor hardware wallet in June. The scammers, impersonating a BitcoinIRA employee named Patricia Macy, tricked the victim into giving them access, after which they stole all the funds.

QWhat connection did ZachXBT find between Tiffany Milanovich and another alleged criminal?

AZachXBT discovered a connection between Tiffany Milanovich and John Daghita, whom he had previously linked to the theft of over $46 million in crypto assets. They had a recorded phone conversation which Milanovich leaked publicly. In retaliation, Daghita published her real name online, which helped ZachXBT identify her.

QBesides the main fraud scheme, what other criticism did ZachXBT recently make according to the article's final paragraph?

AIn the final paragraph, the article mentions that ZachXBT recently suggested people stop using Ledger hardware wallets. He believes that Ledger's frequent updates change the device's interface and could potentially disrupt its basic functions.

İlgili Okumalar

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. is Forced to Defend Itself

China accounted for over 97% of global humanoid robot shipments in the first half of 2026, according to research firm Smart Analytics Global (SAG). Global shipments reached approximately 19,100 units, a 272% increase year-over-year, with China itself representing over 85% of global demand. Shanghai-based AGIBOT led the market with a 44% share, followed by Hangzhou's Unitree Robotics at 31%. Together, these two Chinese firms controlled about 75% of global supply. Demand is shifting from research to practical applications, with industrial and commercial uses now comprising over 70% of shipments. SAG forecasts full-year 2026 shipments near 60,000 units. In response, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned federal agencies and subsidy recipients from purchasing foreign "advanced robotic devices," including humanoids, citing national security concerns. Analysts attribute China's dominance to strong state support, abundant funding, expanding manufacturing capacity, IPO waves, and a vast domestic ecosystem for testing and deployment. Over 90% of key components for Chinese humanoid robots are now sourced domestically. The AI analysis notes potential risks beyond export controls, such as reputational issues for Chinese firms linked to the defense sector and parallels to past trade conflicts in sectors like solar panels, where rapid Chinese market capture led to protectionist measures. The low average robot price could fuel adoption but also invite dumping accusations.

cryptonews.ru3 dk önce

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. is Forced to Defend Itself

cryptonews.ru3 dk önce

DeepSeek's Next Battlefield: The War Quietly Begins in This Fifth-Tier City

DeepSeek and other major AI players are quietly shifting their battle for supremacy to the infrastructure front, with Wulanchabu, a small city in Inner Mongolia, emerging as a key battleground. The article details a visit to the massive data center clusters there, highlighting the industry's pivot from a light-asset model of renting computing power to a strategic race to build and control foundational AI infrastructure. Wulanchabu's advantages—low electricity costs (around ¥0.32-0.35 per kWh, 90% green energy), cool climate, and proximity to Beijing—have made it China's largest AI computing cluster. Companies like Alibaba Cloud are deploying modular, prefabricated data center "cabins" that can be assembled on-site in as little as 100 days, dramatically accelerating deployment compared to traditional multi-year construction. This "new Foxconn" model standardizes components for mass production. The drive for efficiency is paramount. Alibaba’s latest architecture flattens design, integrating power distribution, backup batteries, and liquid-cooled server racks into single modules. The ultimate bottleneck is power. As AI training and, increasingly, inference demand skyrocket, electricity cost and availability become decisive competitive factors. The industry faces the challenge of aligning fast-paced computing demand with slower power grid planning. DeepSeek's significant investment in building its own computing center in Wulanchabu underscores this trend: securing large-scale, low-cost dedicated computing power is now a prerequisite for survival in the AI race. The article concludes that this Chinese manufacturing-supported paradigm for AI infrastructure, focused on modular, rapidly deployable, and cost-optimized data centers, could reshape the global AI landscape as it scales.

marsbit5 dk önce

DeepSeek's Next Battlefield: The War Quietly Begins in This Fifth-Tier City

marsbit5 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片