ZachXBT Exposé: Axiom Exchange Staff Allegedly Misusing Internal Data For Trading

bitcoinist2026-02-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has exposed an alleged insider trading and data abuse scheme at Axiom Exchange involving senior business development staff member Broox Bauer. According to the report, Bauer and others exploited weak internal access controls to monitor user wallets and trading activity through Axiom tools, using referral codes, wallet addresses, and internal IDs. Evidence includes audio clips and screenshots showing private user data being accessed and shared. A Google Sheet was used to track key opinion leaders' wallet information. The activity may fall under SDNY jurisdiction since Bauer is based in New York. Additionally, suspicious trades worth nearly $59,800 were placed just hours before the report was publicized, yielding $109,000 in profit. ZachXBT urged Axiom’s founders to conduct an internal review and take legal action.

After several days of online speculation, blockchain investigator ZachXBT has published the findings of a probe he first alluded to earlier this week, detailing what he describes as insider trading and internal data abuse at Axiom Exchange.

In a series of posts, ZachXBT identified Broox Bauer, known on X as @WheresBroox, as a central figure in the alleged scheme. Bauer is described as a senior business development employee at Axiom based in New York.

Alleged Wallet Lookups And Insider Trading Scheme

According to the investigation, Bauer and others exploited insufficient access controls on internal tools to retrieve sensitive user information and track private wallet activity, allegedly using that data to inform trades as far back as early 2025.

Audio clips shared as part of the report appear to show Bauer explaining how he could monitor any Axiom user through referral codes, wallet addresses or internal user IDs. In one recording, he claims he can “find out anything to do with that person.”

He also describes starting by reviewing 10 to 20 wallets and gradually expanding the scope over time “so it does not look that suspicious.” In another excerpt from the same private group call, Bauer outlines procedures for requesting wallet lookups and says he would provide a full list of tracked addresses.

The investigation cites specific instances of alleged misuse of internal dashboards. In April 2025, Bauer reportedly shared a screenshot from an Axiom internal interface showing private wallet information for a trader identified as “Jerry.”

In August 2025, he allegedly circulated another image displaying registration data and linked wallets for a trader known as “Monix.” That same month, he is said to have discussed conducting lookups on Axiom users who had traded the meme coin AURA.

According to the findings, the group compiled wallet addresses of multiple key opinion leaders (KOLs) into a Google Sheet. The document mapped out addresses gathered from Axiom’s internal dashboard.

Several KOLs named in the sheet or visible in leaked screenshots were contacted and independently confirmed that the wallet data attributed to them was accurate.

Axiom Case May Fall Under SDNY Jurisdiction

The report raises broader concerns about internal oversight at the exchange. It claims there was little to no effective monitoring or restriction on employee access to sensitive user data, regardless of whether senior figures identified as Cal or Mist were aware of the activity.

Given that Bauer is based in New York City, ZachXBT suggested the matter could fall within the jurisdiction of the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

He stated that, regardless of whether criminal charges are ultimately pursued, Axiom’s co-founders should conduct a thorough internal review and consider legal action against any employees found to have abused their access.

Adding to the controversy, separate reports indicate that roughly three hours before ZachXBT publicly disclosed the alleged insider trading activity, a suspected insider placed bets totaling $59,800 using two newly created wallets.

Those trades reportedly generated nearly $109,000 in profit, further fueling concerns about the potential misuse of privileged information.

The 1D chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWho is the central figure identified in ZachXBT's investigation into Axiom Exchange?

ABroox Bauer, a senior business development employee at Axiom based in New York, known on X as @WheresBroox.

QWhat specific method did Bauer allegedly use to monitor Axiom users?

AHe exploited insufficient access controls on internal tools to retrieve sensitive user information through referral codes, wallet addresses, or internal user IDs.

QWhat evidence, beyond internal data access, was presented in the report?

AAudio clips where Bauer explains his monitoring process and screenshots from Axiom's internal interface showing private wallet information for specific traders.

QWhy was it suggested that the case could fall under the jurisdiction of the SDNY?

ABecause the central figure, Broox Bauer, is based in New York City, which is within the jurisdiction of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

QWhat additional event occurred just before the public disclosure that fueled concerns about insider trading?

ARoughly three hours before the disclosure, a suspected insider placed bets totaling $59,800 using two new wallets, which reportedly generated nearly $109,000 in profit.

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit6 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片