XRP Ledger Holds 63% of Tokenised US Treasury Supply

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) currently holds 63% of the total tokenized US Treasury supply, with an issuance volume of 54.41 million, surpassing networks like Ethereum. Despite this dominance in issuance, transfer activity on XRPL remains minimal, with monthly TBILL transfers amounting to only $200—just 0.003% of the activity seen on other major blockchains. This highlights a significant imbalance between issuance and usage. Recent developments, including collaborations with Aviva Investors and OpenEden, aim to boost real-world asset tokenization on XRPL. The coming months are seen as critical for assessing XRPL's performance in the tokenized treasury market.

The XRP Ledger now shelters two-thirds of overall tokenised US Treasury bills. As per the recent reports, the XRP-associated blockchain platform owns around 63% of the overall treasury token supply.

The data unveils that the XRPL is heading the tokenised US Treasury bills, holding around 63% of the overall supply. This milestone is significant to note, as XRP Ledger’s treasury token issuance volume has attained 54.41 million, crossing prominent networks such as Ethereum.

Regardless of this issuance dominance, the transfer activity on the XRP Ledger is minimal when contrasted with different blockchain giants. The monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL attains just $200 as per the reports, at the time when Ethereum and other chains run millions of transactions.

This shows that just a marginal 0.003% activity occurs on the XRP Ledger. This imbalance highlights a prominent challenge facing XRPL. However, the platform controls the overall TBILL issuance; the treasury tokens on XRPL are hardly used.

However, some blockchains are being used as main issuance platforms; others, however, serve as the main channel for trading. It is noteworthy that this comes closely following Binance’s listing of XRPL’s RLUSD stablecoin. As per the reports, the crypto exchange publicised the listing on February 12.

What Does The Latest Report Say?

It is noteworthy that two prominent developments underscore the growth of XRPL’s tokenised treasuries. These advancements comprise Aviva Investors’ large-scale fund tokenisation and OpenEden’s TBILL token.

As per the latest report, Aviva investors collaborated with Ripple to explore tokenisation funds on XRPL. Doppler Finance publicised a collaboration with OpenEden to open up more yield opportunities for XRP and rLUSD holders on the XRP Ledger.

By amalgamating OpenEden’s tokenised real-world asset infrastructure into Doppler’s yield protocol, the platform has prominently impacted the growth of tokenised treasuries on the chain.

As per the industry experts, the upcoming one to three months are crucial to look after, as these months will indicate how XRPL performs in the tokenised treasury market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Shiba Inu Tokens Left Unburned, SHIB Price Sees Daily Drops After Weekly Gains

TagsTokenizexrpXRP Ledger

İlgili Sorular

QWhat percentage of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply does the XRP Ledger hold?

AThe XRP Ledger holds 63% of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply.

QHow does the monthly transfer volume of TBILL on XRPL compare to other blockchains like Ethereum?

AThe monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL is minimal, reaching only about $200, while blockchains like Ethereum process millions of dollars in transactions.

QWhat two recent developments are highlighted as key to the growth of XRPL's tokenised treasuries?

AThe two key developments are Aviva Investors' large-scale fund tokenisation in collaboration with Ripple, and OpenEden's TBILL token in collaboration with Doppler Finance.

QWhat recent listing by Binance is mentioned in relation to the XRP Ledger?

ABinance recently listed XRPL's RLUSD stablecoin, with the announcement made on February 12.

QWhat does the minimal transfer activity on XRPL indicate despite its high issuance volume?

AThe minimal transfer activity, which is only about 0.003%, indicates that while XRPL controls most of the TBILL issuance, the treasury tokens on its platform are hardly being used for transactions.

İlgili Okumalar

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报37 dk önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报37 dk önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News55 dk önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News55 dk önce

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 saat önce

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片