World Liberty expands into lending as WLFI faces selling pressure – Details

ambcrypto2026-01-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a project linked to the Trump family, has expanded into crypto lending with the launch of its new platform, World Liberty Markets. Despite this strategic move and the growth of the crypto-collateralized lending sector, WLFI’s market performance remains under pressure. The token is consolidating around $0.16–$0.17, facing significant selling pressure and bearish momentum. Key indicators, including a positive netflow of $2.8 million and declining momentum readings, suggest continued downward risk. If selling persists, WLFI could fall to $0.15, though a successful product adoption could push it toward $0.20.

Crypto-collateralised lending expanded sharply in 2025, reaching $73 billion in Q3, according to Galaxy Research.

That sector-wide growth has drawn new entrants, including World Liberty Financial, which recently moved into on-chain lending.

World Liberty Financial [WLFI], a project linked to the Trump family, expanded its product suite by launching a crypto lending marketplace.

World Liberty Financial launches lending markets

World Liberty Financial launched World Liberty Markets on the 12th of January, a lending and borrowing platform powered by Dolomite. The web-based application allowed users to supply and borrow digital assets within a unified marketplace.

The product centered on USDI, World Liberty Financial’s dollar-backed stablecoin, alongside its native token, World Liberty Financial [WLFI].

Through the platform, users could earn yield on supplied USDI balances.

At the same time, borrowers could post collateral using assets such as Tether, USD Coin, Ethereum, and tokenized Bitcoin, including Coinbase-wrapped BTC (cBTC).

That launch marked the project’s second major product release following USDI’s debut in 2025.

According to CoinMarketCap data, USDI’s circulating market capitalization stood near $3.48 billion at press time.

Is this a game-changer for WLFI?

Despite World Liberty Financial’s launch of lending markets, the move has yet to positively impact WLFI’s market performance.

In fact, WLFI has continued to trade within a narrow margin and is currently consolidating around the $0.16- $0.17 range. At press time, WLFI traded near $0.168, reflecting modest intraday gains, according to CoinMarketCap.

These market conditions indicate continued struggle, with pressure increasingly on both demand and supply. In fact, WLFI has continued to face massive sell pressure, with scarcity declining significantly.

According to CoinGlass, WLFI Netflow has remained positive for two consecutive days, rising to a total of $2.8 million over this period. Often, a positive Netflow suggests higher inflows, a clear sign of aggressive spot selling.

Historically, higher inflows have preceded greater downward pressure on an asset, a prelude to lower prices. In fact, downward momentum has remained elevated as evidenced by the Directional Movement Index (DMI).

This momentum indicator has dropped to 23, while its negative index jumped to a high of 30, reflecting strong bearish pressure.

At the same time, its Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) fell to 0.12, further validating the trend’s strength. When these directional momentum indicators drop to such levels, it reflects strong downward pressure and weakened structure.

Often, such market conditions have led to lower prices. If World Liberty Financial sellers continue to offload, WLFI could breach $0.16 support and drop to $0.15.

However, if the recent launch of the lending market positively impacts price action, the altcoin could break out and target $0.2.


Final Thoughts

  • World Liberty Financial’s move into crypto lending expanded its utility narrative, but markets have not priced that shift in yet.
  • Exchange flows and momentum indicators suggested traders remained cautious despite the product launch. Whether adoption can outweigh near-term selling pressure may shape WLFI’s next decisive move.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat new product did World Liberty Financial launch and on what date?

AWorld Liberty Financial launched World Liberty Markets, a lending and borrowing platform, on the 12th of January.

QAccording to the article, what was the total value of the crypto-collateralised lending sector in Q3 2025?

AThe crypto-collateralised lending sector reached $73 billion in Q3 2025, according to Galaxy Research.

QWhat are the two main tokens central to World Liberty Financial's new lending marketplace?

AThe two main tokens are USDI, its dollar-backed stablecoin, and its native token, WLFI.

QWhat does a positive Netflow value for WLFI, as reported by CoinGlass, typically indicate?

AA positive Netflow often suggests higher inflows, which is a clear sign of aggressive spot selling.

QWhat are the potential price targets for WLFI mentioned in the article, based on market conditions?

AIf selling pressure continues, WLFI could drop to $0.15. If the lending market launch positively impacts the price, it could break out and target $0.2.

İlgili Okumalar

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit7 dk önce

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit7 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 saat önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片