‘Withdraw Insurance to Buy Stocks’: South Koreans Over 60 Are Borrowing to Bet on Samsung

marsbit2026-05-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

South Korea's stock market has seen a frenzy, with the KOSPI nearly doubling in six months. This boom is fueled by a surge in retail investors borrowing to buy stocks, with outstanding margin loans hitting a record high. A significant portion of this debt is held by people over 50, with the 60+ age group seeing the fastest growth. Many are reportedly cashing out savings-type life insurance policies—even at a loss—to fund their stock investments. They are heavily concentrated in major semiconductor stocks like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which have driven most of the market's gains. This trend is particularly risky for older investors, who are leveraging their limited retirement savings. While a market correction in March caused significant losses for leveraged accounts, the swift recovery and continued rally have reinforced risky behavior. Stories of quick profits on platforms like Blind further fuel the speculative rush. The phenomenon is partly driven by economic anxiety. With South Korea having a high elderly poverty rate and a low public pension replacement rate, some seniors see the booming market as a last chance to improve their finances. This "FOMO" (fear of missing out) sentiment is palpable, even in public parks where retirees gather and now discuss stock tips alongside their usual activities. Despite regulatory warnings and the inherent risks of leverage—especially for those with little time to recover from losses—the borrowing binge continues. The market...

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

How frenzied has the South Korean stock market become recently?

The KOSPI rose from around 4,000 points to nearly 8,000 points in six months. According to a report in the "JoongAng Ilbo," the employee restrooms in a department store in Seoul's Gangnam District are completely full every day at 3:30 p.m., the market close time, with employees hiding inside to check stock prices.

By mid-May, the balance of loans taken by Korean retail investors from securities firms for stock trading had surged to a historic high of 36.47 trillion won (approximately 170 billion yuan), doubling within a year.

But in this carnival, the source of the money is a bit odd.

According to a report in the "Korea Herald," the three major life insurance companies in South Korea saw policy surrenders totaling 4.9 trillion won (approximately 230 billion yuan) in the first quarter, a year-on-year increase of 16.3%. Savings-type life insurance policies were surrendered the most aggressively, up 23.2%.

Savings-type life insurance is inherently a product for leaving money to family. Surrendering a policy guarantees a loss, as the surrender value is lower than the premiums paid. Yet, more and more people are choosing to take a loss and surrender their policies.

Where does the withdrawn money go? Most likely, into another stock trading account.

Data obtained by a South Korean lawmaker from the Financial Supervisory Service shows that as of the end of the first quarter, retail investors borrowed 27 trillion won from the top ten securities firms for stock trading. Of this amount, over sixty percent (62.3%) was borrowed by people aged 50 and above.

The debt of the group aged 60 and above doubled in one year, from 3.95 trillion won to 8.02 trillion won, the sharpest increase among all age groups.

Withdrawing insurance to buy stocks—an entire generation of South Koreans is using future money to chase the current bottom.

Borrowing Because of the Crazy Bull Market?

Adding leverage in a bull market is called "amplifying returns"; adding leverage in a bear market is called "accelerating to zero." Korean seniors have already experienced this roller coaster once.

In early March of this year, joint U.S.-Israel airstrikes on Iran caused panic in global capital markets. The South Korean stock market triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive trading days, with the KOSPI plunging nearly 13%.

According to a late March report by the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea, during that downturn, among the nation's 4.6 million retail investor accounts, those who used margin loans lost an average of 19%, while those who didn't lost 8.2%. Those who borrowed to trade stocks lost 2.3 times more than those who didn't borrow.

Breaking it down by age group, the leveraged account holders aged 60 and above suffered the worst, with an average return rate of -19.8%, the lowest among all age groups.

What's even harsher is what comes next: forced liquidation.

Leveraged accounts have a liquidation line. If the market value of the stocks in the account falls below this line, the securities firm won't consult with you; they will directly sell your positions. The Financial Supervisory Service received numerous complaints from retail investors at the time, such as "My stocks were sold without my knowledge" and "I was charged exorbitant interest rates."

A significant portion of these complaints came from the elderly, who were already unfamiliar with trading rules. However, it must be said, the retail investors who held on during the March circuit breakers ultimately won.

The Korean stock market recovered all those losses in just over two months and has been rising ever since. Those who held on through March have seen their accounts fully recover, with some possibly even making money.

There was volatility, there was room for an uptrend, so this became a successful experience of "getting on board," even if it meant getting on board with borrowed money.

Thus, this success story becomes the excuse for the next, bolder move. After the March circuit breakers, margin lending to South Korean retail investors not only didn't shrink but kept rising. Public data shows that the total margin loan balance hit a record high of 25 trillion won by the end of April; by mid-May, it had surged further to 36.47 trillion won.

In just a month and a half, South Korean retail investors collectively borrowed an additional 11 trillion won (approximately 52 billion yuan).

Looking at individual cases. In early May, a South Korean civil servant posted a screenshot on the Korean workplace community Blind:

Their account showed 2.3 billion won (approximately $1.7 million) all-in on SK Hynix, with 1.7 billion of that borrowed from a securities firm. In other words, their own capital was 600 million won, leveraged by 1.7 billion in borrowed funds.

Four days later, they updated that they had already made 267 million won.

On the same day, another post from a woman in her 20s working for Seoul Metro said she would rather "go completely bust" than miss this wave, going all-in on SK Hynix with 150% margin financing. Borrowed money was used as principal to borrow yet again.

Such posts are discussed daily on the Korean Blind community.

The regulators are not unaware of this FOMO frenzy. At the end of March, the Financial Supervisory Service summoned major securities firms to strengthen risk controls, and some brokerages temporarily restricted new margin loans for overheated stocks. But the money already lent out remains there, accruing interest daily at annual rates ranging from 7% to 9%.

Calculating at an 8% interest rate, South Korean retail investors collectively pay nearly 3 trillion won (approximately 14 billion yuan) in interest to securities firms annually.

However, leveraging at 60 is a different matter from leveraging at 30. A 30-year-old who gets wiped out still has decades of salary to slowly recover. A 60-year-old who gets wiped out potentially loses their entire pension, with only exhausted physical strength and the reality of being unable to earn more left.

If another circuit breaker hits, the outcome might not be "a full recovery in just over two months."

In Tapgol Park, the Flowing Intelligence Among the Elderly

Like all Korean retail investors, the elderly in Korea are borrowing and betting on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.

Samsung Electronics is up 138% year-to-date, SK Hynix is up 189%. The KOSPI as a whole is up about 80%, but excluding these two companies, the remaining stocks have gained only about 30%.

These two companies together account for over 43% of the weighting in the KOSPI index. This means that as long as these two rise, the entire Korean stock market rises.

Most of the money borrowed by the elderly flows here. A quarter of the net purchases by Korean retail investors this year went into these two companies. The remaining three-quarters are scattered across other stocks, but the overall gain for those other stocks this year is only 30%.

There's Tapgol Park in Jongno District, Seoul, one of the city's oldest public parks. Young people rarely visit. Its regulars are a group of retired seniors who come to the park every morning, drink free coffee, chat, play board games—time seems to flow as slowly as if it were standing still.

According to a report by the "Kyunghyang Shinmun," the topics of conversation in Tapgol Park have changed this year.

Amidst coffee drinking, someone might say, "My Samsung stocks went up again." During a board game, someone might ask, "Did you buy Hynix?" A 77-year-old gentleman told his middle school classmates that Samsung and Hynix have been performing well lately and that he had made a bit in his account.

A corner of Tapgol Park, gathering many elderly people playing board games

Source: Seoul News

However, he didn't mention whether he borrowed money or how much he borrowed.

Topics popular among seniors in the park don't come out of thin air; they resemble intelligence exchanged at the village entrance station. For instance, an elderly person hears another senior made money in the park and checks their own account the next day. Then they start trying to borrow a little. And then potentially borrow more and more.

But if you ask why South Korean seniors are appearing in leveraged stock trading accounts, this is actually related to their retirement security.

According to OECD data, the relative poverty rate among South Korea's population aged 65 and above is about 40%, the highest among OECD member countries. The replacement rate of the National Pension (South Korea's version of a pension) has long been low. The OECD average is around 50%, while South Korea's is only about 31%.

Conversely, the labor force participation rate of those aged 65 and above is the highest among OECD countries, meaning a significant portion of South Korean seniors have to continue working after retirement.

Therefore, the availability of free coffee in places like Tapgol Park is essentially a form of social relief in South Korea. A cup of coffee costs less than 500 won. For seniors with a monthly pension of less than a thousand dollars, this is part of daily life.

But the elderly in Tapgol Park are no longer just there for free coffee and board games. They might also have the KOSPI行情 open on their phones.

After taking office, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung has been vigorously promoting全民炒股 (全民炒股 - mass participation in stock trading). He has publicly called himself the "Great Ant," where "ant" is a common nickname for retail investors in Korea. He set a KOSPI突破 5000点 as an administrative goal.

In other words, to some extent, the elderly borrowing to buy stocks is officially encouraged in South Korea.

What the elderly are truly betting on is an anxiety. If they don't get on board now, they will miss out.

This is their last chance before retirement. The South Korean semiconductor industry is cyclical, having experienced more than one boom-to-bust roller coaster over the past three decades.

SK Hynix reported a loss of 4.26 trillion won in 2023, its worst performance in a decade. Switching from massive losses one year to an operating profit margin of 72% in a single quarter two years later (surpassing Nvidia)—the speed of this cyclical shift itself serves as a reminder that the cycle might switch back again.

And time, perhaps, is the most precious thing for these elderly individuals borrowing to trade stocks.

The elderly in Tapgol Park are striving to seize the红利 of this era. The coffee is still free. The行情 on their phones hasn't stopped for a moment.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what drastic financial action are some elderly Koreans taking to invest in the stock market?

ASome elderly Koreans are surrendering their savings-type life insurance policies, even at a loss (as the surrender value is often lower than the premiums paid), and using the proceeds, along with borrowed money from brokerages (margin loans), to invest in stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix.

QWhat was the performance of leveraged versus non-leveraged散户 investors during the market crash in March mentioned in the article?

ADuring the market crash in March,散户 investors who used margin loans (leveraged) experienced an average loss of 19%, which was 2.3 times the average 8.2% loss suffered by those who did not use borrowed money.

QWhy are Korean senior citizens particularly vulnerable when using leverage to invest in the stock market?

AKorean senior citizens are particularly vulnerable because if they experience a significant loss or a margin call, they risk losing their entire pension savings. Unlike younger individuals who have decades of earning potential to recover, older individuals may lack the physical capacity and opportunity to earn back the money.

QHow does the article describe the role of Samsung and SK Hynix in the current Korean stock market rally?

AThe article describes Samsung and SK Hynix as the primary drivers of the KOSPI rally. Together, they account for over 43% of the KOSPI index's weight. While KOSPI rose 80% overall, removing these two companies reduces the remaining market's gain to only about 30%. A significant portion of散户 investment, including from seniors, has flowed into these two stocks.

QWhat underlying socio-economic factors, according to the article, are driving elderly Koreans to take on risky investments?

AKey factors include a high relative poverty rate among those over 65 (around 40%, the highest in the OECD), a low pension replacement rate (about 31%, compared to the OECD average of 50%), and a high labor participation rate among seniors, indicating financial pressure. This creates anxiety and a sense that investing in the current stock market rally is a 'last chance' to improve their financial security before it's too late.

İlgili Okumalar

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit43 dk önce

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit43 dk önce

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit49 dk önce

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit49 dk önce

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit49 dk önce

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit49 dk önce

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报58 dk önce

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报58 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片