Winter for Crypto IPOs: Consensys and Ledger Withdraw Applications

marsbit2026-05-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The crypto IPO window is tightening significantly in 2026, marked by prominent companies delaying or pausing their public listing plans. Following a successful 2025 "harvest year" that saw Circle, Bullish, and Gemini go public amidst a bull market, the tide has turned. Consensys, developer of MetaMask, recently postponed its IPO until at least fall 2026. Hardware wallet leader Ledger also suspended its planned US listing due to unfavorable market conditions, with Kraken having previously delayed its own plans. This shift is driven by a cooling market in 2026, characterized by a significant Bitcoin price correction, declining trading volumes, and reduced investor risk appetite for crypto stocks. The poor post-IPO performance of 2025 listings like Circle and Bullish, which saw major share price declines, has heightened investor caution. This contrasts sharply with the current AI sector, where companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are commanding massive valuations and investor enthusiasm based on narratives of stable, exponential growth. Crypto companies now face pressure to transition from hype-driven models to demonstrating reliable cash flows and robust compliance. While the paused IPO plans may lead to valuation resets and affect ecosystem liquidity, they also accelerate industry consolidation toward stronger, more compliant infrastructure players. A potential recovery in Bitcoin's price and clearer regulations could reopen the IPO window in the latter half of 2026.

Author: Ma Ke, Foresight News

On May 14th, Consensys, the developer of MetaMask wallet, temporarily postponed its IPO to at least the Fall of this year. Meanwhile, crypto hardware wallet giant Ledger also suspended its US IPO plan on May 13th. Previously, the exchange Kraken had repeatedly delayed its listing plans. This series of IPO postponements and suspensions signals a significant narrowing of the 2026 IPO window following the 2025 boom in crypto company listings.

2025 was considered a "bumper year for IPOs" in the industry: stablecoin issuer Circle successfully listed on the NYSE, and several companies including Bullish and Gemini completed their listings, initially opening an exit channel for crypto VCs. Crypto-related IPOs in 2025 raised approximately $14.6 billion, and VC deal volume soared to $19.7 billion. BTC price once surged to a record high of $126,000, institutional capital flowed in, the regulatory environment was relatively friendly, and multiple crypto stocks saw strong first-day performance.

Entering 2026, Bitcoin's price corrected significantly, trading volume declined, and investor risk appetite for crypto stocks cooled rapidly. BitGo, as the first crypto IPO of 2026, priced at $18 in January for its listing. Although it briefly rose on its debut, it subsequently fell back, once dropping to $7, and has now recovered to $11.9.

Specifically, the listing pace of several leading companies has clearly slowed. Payward, the parent company of Kraken, confidentially filed an S-1 form in November 2025, originally planning to proceed in Q1 2026 with a valuation target once aiming for $20 billion. On March 18th this year, the company paused its plans due to "difficult market conditions." Co-CEO Arjun Sethi stated that although the valuation dropped to $13.3 billion in a recent funding round, the IPO filing remains valid, awaiting the optimal window.

Arjun Sethi

Ledger's suspension was more abrupt. Known for its hardware wallets and enterprise-grade infrastructure, reports in January 2026 indicated it had hired investment banks to prepare for a US listing targeting a $4 billion valuation. Citing sources familiar with the matter, unfavorable market conditions led Ledger to decide to pause, without initiating the formal filing process. A company spokesperson declined to comment but suggested the possibility of turning to private financing to sustain growth.

Notably, just in March, Ledger appointed former Circle executive John Andrews as CFO and opened a New York office to strengthen its US business layout. This expansion shows its business strategy remains unchanged; the IPO pause is more due to external factors.

Meanwhile, MetaMask parent company Consensys also joined the wait-and-see ranks. The company had hired JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs as underwriters, originally planning to submit an S-1 form around the end of February with a target to list in 2026. However, due to market weakness, Consensys has postponed its IPO to at least this Fall.

Behind these crypto companies' IPO suspensions are, of course, the combined result of multiple factors.

The stock performance of the first wave of crypto IPOs in 2025 has intensified market caution toward the 2026 listing window.

This year, Circle's stock price has fallen from a high of $300 to below $50, Bullish dropped from $118 to below $25. Even BitGo, the first crypto IPO of 2026 opening the year, couldn't escape—after pricing at $18 and listing in January, it briefly rebounded but then fell all the way to near $7 at its lowest.

This year's performance collectively confirms that crypto-related stocks are prone to capital chasing at the tail end of a bull market but struggle to withstand valuation resets during cyclical downturns. Traditional institutional investors' required risk premium for "cycle-bound" assets has significantly increased.

In stark contrast to the "cooling-off period" for crypto IPOs, the AI sector in 2026 is in the midst of a dual boom in IPOs and fundraising.

SpaceX has begun IPO preparations, targeting a staggering valuation of $1.75 to $2 trillion, becoming one of the world's most anticipated tech listing projects.

OpenAI's valuation is approaching $1 trillion and is in close communication with several investment banks regarding its listing path; Anthropic's valuation has neared $900 billion and is also actively preparing IPO materials. The AI narrative, with its promise of a "productivity revolution," has attracted a massive influx of long-term capital. Even in an environment of macro uncertainty, AI-related IPOs can garner a much higher risk appetite than crypto assets.

In comparison, crypto companies are highly dependent on Bitcoin prices and trading volumes, with stronger revenue volatility, making it difficult to offer the "exponential growth" certainty promised by AI companies. This cross-sectoral divergence between hot and cold further amplifies investor wait-and-see sentiment towards crypto IPOs, also forcing crypto companies to accelerate their transition from "storytelling" to "telling cash flow stories, telling compliance stories."

Furthermore, crypto companies are shifting towards more pragmatic strategies: although private financing has shrunk in scale, it can still provide a buffer; some companies choose to first optimize product lines, expand into stablecoins or institutional services, and wait for Bitcoin to stabilize at a higher range and for market conditions to improve before proceeding with a listing.

The implications of this phenomenon for the industry warrant deeper thought.

On one hand, it accelerates survival of the fittest. Weaker projects face increased fundraising difficulty, and resources concentrate towards companies with strong compliance and solid infrastructure, such as Ledger's institutional-grade platform and Kraken's custody business. On the other hand, it highlights the crypto industry's transition from narrative-driven to performance-driven. Companies truly capable of weathering cycles are building anti-volatility cash flows and enhancing transparency to win long-term trust. However, in the short term, the narrowing IPO window may lead to valuation resets and affect confidence and liquidity across the entire ecosystem.

Looking ahead, if Bitcoin returns to $90,000 or higher, and regulatory bills are further enacted, the second half of 2026 may usher in a second wave of IPO windows.

İlgili Sorular

QWhich two major crypto companies have recently postponed or paused their IPO plans, and what is the timeline for one of them?

AConsensys, the developer of MetaMask, and Ledger, the hardware wallet giant, have both postponed or paused their IPO plans. Consensys has temporarily delayed its IPO until the earliest this fall.

QWhat was the total amount raised by crypto-related IPOs and the total VC deal volume in the year 2025, as mentioned in the article?

AIn 2025, crypto-related IPOs raised approximately $14.6 billion, and the total VC deal volume surged to $19.7 billion.

QWhat key factor is cited as contrasting with the crypto IPO 'cooling-off period' in 2026, and name one prominent example company in that sector?

AIn contrast to the crypto IPO 'cooling-off period', the AI sector is experiencing a dual climax of IPOs and financing in 2026. A prominent example is SpaceX, which has initiated IPO preparations with a target valuation of $1.75 to $2 trillion.

QAccording to the article, why are investors showing more caution towards crypto IPOs in 2026 compared to AI companies?

AInvestors are more cautious towards crypto IPOs because crypto companies are highly dependent on Bitcoin price and trading volume, resulting in stronger revenue volatility and an inability to provide the 'exponential growth' certainty promised by AI companies. AI's 'productivity revolution' narrative attracts long-term capital.

QWhat potential future developments could lead to a second wave of IPO opportunities in the second half of 2026, as per the article's outlook?

AAccording to the article's outlook, if Bitcoin returns to $90,000 or higher and regulatory legislation further materializes, the second half of 2026 could see a second wave of IPO opportunities.

İlgili Okumalar

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5 saat önce

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit5 saat önce

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit5 saat önce

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinist6 saat önce

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinist6 saat önce

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit7 saat önce

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures