Will Hyperliquid (HYPE) Overcome $30 Resistance or Face a Short-Term Correction?

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-07 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid (HYPE) is showing early signs of stabilization, trading near $27.38 with a modest 0.7% gain. After a prolonged downtrend since late October, the token is attempting to form a base near the $25–$26 support zone. Key resistance lies at the 50-day and 100-day moving averages around $31.7 and $37.5, which continue to slope downward, indicating the broader trend remains weak. The RSI is neutral in the mid-40s, suggesting eased selling pressure but limited buying strength. Critical support is at $25, with further downside possible to $23. A break above $28.5–$29.0 could signal improved near-term momentum, but the overall structure requires consolidation.

Hyperliquid is showing early signs of stability after a long period of downside pressure. The token is currently trading near $27.38, posting a modest gain of around 0.7% over the past 24 hours. During the latest session, Hyperliquid recorded an intraday low near $26.53 and climbed to a high of about $28.40 before easing back, reflecting cautious buying activity rather than aggressive momentum.

Looking at recent price action, Hyperliquid has been in a clear downtrend since late October. The price has continued to form lower highs and lower lows, reflecting weak market sentiment through November and December. However, the latest candles indicate a slowdown in selling, with the price attempting to build a base near the $25–$26 zone before pushing slightly higher.

Moving Averages Highlight Resistance Around $31–$37

From a moving average perspective, the broader trend remains weak. Hyperliquid is still trading below both the 50-day and 100-day moving averages, located around $31.7 and $37.5. These averages continue to slope downward, confirming that the larger trend has not yet shifted. Still, the distance between price and the short-term average has narrowed, which may support a period of consolidation rather than further sharp declines.

The RSI on the daily chart is hovering in the mid-40s range. That suggests neutral momentum, selling pressure has eased, but buying strength is still limited. The indicator does not signal strong upside yet, but it also does not show oversold conditions.

In terms of key levels, the $25 area remains an important support zone, followed by a deeper support zone near $23 if weakness returns. This level has held during recent pullbacks and will be crucial for maintaining short-term stability. On the upside, immediate resistance is seen near $28.5–$29.0, followed by the $31 level, where the 50-day moving average sits. A move above these levels would be needed to improve the short-term structure.

Overall, Hyperliquid’s price action points to early signs of stabilization after a long decline. While the broader trend is still recovering, holding above key support levels could allow the token to move into a consolidation phase in the near term.

TagsAltcoinCrypto MarketHYPEHyperliquidHyperliquid (HYPE)

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current trading price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) and its 24-hour performance?

AHyperliquid is currently trading near $27.38, posting a modest gain of around 0.7% over the past 24 hours.

QWhat key resistance levels does Hyperliquid face according to the moving averages?

AThe 50-day moving average is located around $31.7 and the 100-day moving average is near $37.5, creating a resistance zone between $31–$37.

QWhat does the RSI indicator suggest about Hyperliquid's momentum?

AThe RSI on the daily chart is hovering in the mid-40s range, suggesting neutral momentum with eased selling pressure but limited buying strength.

QWhat are the important support levels for Hyperliquid mentioned in the article?

AThe $25 area is an important support zone, followed by a deeper support zone near $23 if weakness returns.

QWhat price action pattern has Hyperliquid been showing since late October?

AHyperliquid has been in a clear downtrend since late October, forming lower highs and lower lows, reflecting weak market sentiment through November and December.

İlgili Okumalar

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit6 dk önce

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit6 dk önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 saat önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片