Why Hyperliquid is ‘quietly outgrowing’ Coinbase on THESE fronts

ambcrypto2026-02-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX), is significantly outperforming Coinbase in key metrics, with nearly double the notional trading volume ($2.6T vs. $1.4T). Its native token, HYPE, has also delivered superior investor returns, up 32% YTD compared to COIN's 27% decline. Both platforms are competing to become an "everything exchange," but Hyperliquid has rapidly expanded beyond crypto into tokenized assets like gold and silver, which now account for over 30% of its volume. It currently handles 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes, 32% of Bybit’s, and 24% of OKX’s. Despite regulatory risks being a concern, Hyperliquid’s growth continues, with its token eyeing key support levels amid renewed market interest.

Over the past few months, Hyperliquid has been playing catch-up to major centralized exchanges (CEXs). Now, it has begun flipping them on key metrics.

According to the analytics firm Artemis, the DEX platform is “quietly outgrowing” Coinbase with nearly 2x in notional trading volume.

“Notional trading volume: Coinbase $1.4T, Hyperliquid $2.6T. That’s nearly 2x Coinbase’s volume... from an onchain exchange. And the market is noticing.”

The outperformance has gone beyond ecosystem traction. Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, has also surpassed Coinbase’s COIN in investor returns. On a year-to-date (YTD) basis, HYPE holders have netted 32% while COIN holders were down 27% – A nearly 60% lead on investor gains.

The race for ‘everything exchange’

The comparison between the two platforms makes sense because both are pushing towards an “everything exchange” vision. Coinbase covers services spanning asset custody, trading, prediction markets, and more.

Similarly, Hyperliquid aims to house all finance under one roof and has made significant strides despite being operational for over a year.

After conquering the crypto perpetual markets and rivaling incumbents like Binance, Hyperliquid’s debut into tokenized markets via equity perps exploded. Now, over 30% of Hyperliquid’s DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, dominated by gold and silver.

The results? Slow and steady clawing of market share from Binance and other top centralized players. Since last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes.

Although the October crash led to a cool-off of the ratio to 10%, the perp DEX platform traction has since been climbing again. Compared to Bybit, Hyperliquid now handles 32% of its perpetual volumes and 24% of OKX’s activity.

Overall, at press time, the perp DEX was handling over 6% of total CEX volumes, with a strong renewed traction in 2026.

HYPE eyes key support

Market watchers have cautioned that the only threats to the massive growth can be a hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Agree here that hype’s biggest risk is regulatory. They need to get much more embedded with the tradfi elites as regulators will eventually get involved.”

That said, HYPE has been a key beneficiary of the traction, with rising revenue funding token buybacks.

However, HYPE’s cool-off isn’t over yet, and a retest of $26-$28 support zone (white) could offer new buying opportunities if risk sentiment improves after the U.S inflation print scheduled for Friday.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid saw 2x more derivatives market activity compared to Coinbase.
  • The DEX platform handled over 6% of total CEX perpetual volumes amid renewed traction in 2026.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's notional trading volume compare to Coinbase's?

AAccording to analytics firm Artemis, Hyperliquid's notional trading volume is nearly 2x that of Coinbase, with $2.6T compared to Coinbase's $1.4T.

QWhat is the year-to-date (YTD) performance difference between the HYPE token and Coinbase's COIN stock?

AOn a YTD basis, HYPE holders have netted a 32% gain, while COIN holders were down 27%, giving HYPE a nearly 60% lead in investor gains.

QWhat significant non-crypto market did Hyperliquid debut in, and what is its impact?

AHyperliquid debuted in tokenized markets via equity perps, and now over 30% of its DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, which are dominated by gold and silver.

QWhat percentage of Binance's perpetual volumes has Hyperliquid handled since last August?

ASince last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance's perpetual volumes.

QWhat are cited as the primary threats to Hyperliquid's massive growth?

AThe primary threats cited are a potential hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ).

İlgili Okumalar

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit22 dk önce

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit22 dk önce

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit27 dk önce

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit27 dk önce

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报37 dk önce

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报37 dk önce

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1 saat önce

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1 saat önce

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit2 saat önce

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片