Why 21Shares believes ‘passive strategies’ for crypto ETFs are outdated

ambcrypto2026-03-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

21Shares President Duncan Moir argues that passive 'HODL' strategies for crypto ETFs are becoming outdated. Instead, the firm advocates for active management to capture yield and diversification opportunities in the growing asset class. Key strategies include yield-generating products like a preferred stock ETP offering an 11.5% dividend, staking rewards in ETFs, and thematic offerings such as a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP. While U.S. investor interest remains focused on large coins, European institutions are exploring newer assets and application layers. Despite a decline in total crypto ETF AUM to $130 billion, active strategies aim to drive future demand.

For most Bitcoin OGs in the space, the main crypto investment strategy has always been ‘HODL,’ which has been enough to outperform most assets in certain periods.

Early asset managers who entered the sector also adopted a similar passive strategy for their respective crypto ETFs (exchange-traded funds). They have been holding the crypto assets in the hope that, in three, six, or 12 months, their value would appreciate.

According to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, however, crypto ETFs are transitioning from passive management to active strategies. Moir noted that the sector was a ‘nascent’ and ‘growing asset class’ that fits perfectly with active management.

At the core of this new strategy is scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding the crypto assets. From a regional crypto ETF demand, Moir said,

The interest is still concentrated in the larger coins in the US. In Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond the Layer-1.

Source: CoinShares

In fact, on a year-to-date (YTD) basis, the U.S. leads with $638 million in crypto inflows, followed closely by Germany at $377 million and Switzerland at $233 million.

Crypto ETFs evolution and diversification

For Moir, the mature investor base in Europe, who already hold Bitcoin and Ethereum, is looking to expand their crypto allocation with better offerings.

This led to 21Shares launching an ETP tied to Strategy’s preferred stock, Stretch (STRC), which offers an annual dividend yield of up to 11.5% payable monthly. This is one of the Strategy’s ways of raising capital for Bitcoin buys.

Moir noted that the product has been an instant success across several regions, underscoring a strong appetite for yield-bearing assets that are feasibly accessible via traditional platforms.

Additionally, crypto ETF staking rewards have become another active strategy to maximize investors’ returns.

Grayscale and BlackRock’s push for staking rewards in their respective Spot ETH ETFs is one example of asset managers seeking more opportunities for investors.

Finally, Moir said they also look for major thematic trends or future shifts that can be maximized. The approach informed the launch of 21Shares’ Bitcoin-and-gold ETP, based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt.

It remains to be seen how the new active strategy will drive demand into crypto ETFs. As of writing, the total crypto ETF assets under management (AUM) were about $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

Source: Blockworks

Final Summary

  • 21Shares’ Duncan Moir said that active strategies will be at the center of the next crypto ETF management.
  • Yield-focused wrappers and staking rewards are some active strategies asset managers are deploying for investors.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, why are crypto ETFs transitioning from passive to active strategies?

ABecause crypto sector is a 'nascent' and 'growing asset class' that fits perfectly with active management, focusing on scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding crypto assets.

QWhat regional differences in crypto ETF demand does Duncan Moir highlight between the US and Europe?

AIn the US, interest is concentrated in larger coins, while in Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond Layer-1.

QWhat are two specific active strategies mentioned that asset managers are using to maximize investor returns?

AYield-focused wrappers (like the ETP tied to Stretch offering 11.5% annual dividend) and staking rewards in crypto ETFs.

QWhat was the rationale behind 21Shares launching a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP?

AIt was based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt, capitalizing on major thematic trends.

QWhat is the current total assets under management (AUM) for crypto ETFs as mentioned in the article?

AAbout $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

İlgili Okumalar

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit39 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit39 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报43 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报43 dk önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 saat önce

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 saat önce

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片