Who is Making Money in the AI Era? The Must-See Investment List for HALO Asset Trading

marsbit2026-03-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-06 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article examines who profits in the AI era, revisiting Daniel Gross's 2024 questions on AI's impact. It finds value is concentrated in infrastructure: Nvidia, with a $3.2 trillion market cap increase, captured most profits, while cloud providers like Microsoft saw modest gains. Energy emerged as a critical bottleneck, with nuclear and utility stocks surging. Copper demand soared due to data centers, while coal saw mixed results. Geopolitically, the US leads in AI investment and model development. API costs plummeted 50x, driving deflation in knowledge production, but overall SaaS revenues grew. Key bottlenecks include chip packaging and power transformers. The piece also discusses AI's uneven impact on employment, regional real estate, and the fragile balance in semiconductor supply chains, particularly on Taiwan.

Editor's Note: In early 2024, AI was still in a phase of both fervor and uncertainty. At that time, Daniel Gross raised 18 questions on a single page: Where will value flow? Will energy become a bottleneck? Will software engineers be replaced? How will the competitive landscape between nations change?

Looking back two years later, these questions themselves are more enlightening than any specific predictions. AI profits have indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—Nvidia emerged as the biggest winner; energy and power quickly became new strategic bottlenecks; API costs plummeted, while computing power, capital, and geopolitical risks continued to amplify.

This article revisits the key questions Gross raised at the time and examines them against the reality of the past two years. It is not only a review of AI investment logic but also a roadmap for observing how the technological revolution is reshaping market structures, industry chains, and the global power landscape.

Below is the original text:

In January 2024, Daniel Gross, then CEO of Safe Superintelligence and now Head of AI at Meta, published an article titled "AGI Trades."


The article was just one page long, listing a series of questions about the potential impacts of AI progress. Looking back over two years later, these questions appear remarkably prescient, even though no definitive conclusions were drawn for each question at the time. Below, we review each of the 18 questions he raised.

Markets

In a post-AGI world, where will value flow?


Currently, value is indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—chips, packaging, power, and other areas. Nvidia has captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many companies are still operating at a loss. This is also clearly reflected in market capitalization changes: Nvidia's market cap increased by $3.2 trillion, rising from $1.2 trillion to $4.4 trillion; in comparison, the gains for cloud platforms have been much more modest (Microsoft up 4%, Amazon up 30%).

In the private market, the valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI has also been astonishing, but their combined total value increase of $1.4 trillion is still lower than the market cap added by Nvidia during the same period.


This was a critical question at the very beginning of 2024.

What will happen to Nvidia and Microsoft?


Nvidia has performed exceptionally strongly. Its revenue grew from $60.9 billion in fiscal year 2024 to $215.9 billion in fiscal year 2026, nearly tripling.

Microsoft, however, has been less dominant. Azure's growth did accelerate to a 40% year-over-year rate, but from January 2024 to March 2026, Microsoft's stock price rose by only 4%. The market has questioned its annual AI capital expenditure of over $80 billion—when will these investments translate into returns remains unclear.

In this AI "gold rush" of "selling shovels and picks," Nvidia is clearly the biggest winner, while Microsoft's bets on infrastructure have yet to deliver obvious returns to shareholders.

Is copper mispriced?


It was severely undervalued. In January 2024, the price of copper was $3.75 per pound; two years later, it reached a record high of $6.61 per pound.

AI's demand for copper is enormous. For example:

Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 server rack uses over 5,000 copper wires

If fully straightened, the total length exceeds 2 miles

A 100MW data center requires approximately 3,000 tons of copper

Overall, data centers may consume 500,000 tons of copper annually. Some have thus called "copper the new oil." Of course, many other things have also been called "the new oil," as AI infrastructure construction is extremely complex, with bottlenecks at almost every stage. So this analogy should be viewed with caution.

Real Estate

If AI can write all software, will San Francisco become the new Detroit?

It depends on what is meant by "the new Detroit."

AI actually saved San Francisco from becoming a declining city like Detroit. San Francisco is still thriving:

· Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%

· OpenAI occupies 1 million square feet of office space

· Anthropic owns a 25-story office building

· Sierra signed a lease for 300,000 square feet of office space

In the first half of 2025, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding flowed to the Bay Area

Of course, there is another side: overall employment in San Francisco remains below pre-pandemic levels, but housing prices remain strong. Thus, it is far from a "shell city." The urban environment has also become cleaner.

How will AI affect wealth inequality?

It is still too early to draw conclusions, as data changes are not yet significant, but some studies are worth noting.

A 2025 IMF study suggested: AI may reduce wage inequality (by automating high-income jobs) but could exacerbate wealth inequality (as gains concentrate among tech company owners).

An OECD study found: Low-skilled jobs saw the fastest wage growth (assemblers +11.6%), while high-skilled jobs saw the slowest (CEOs +2.7%). However, this may reflect minimum wage policies more than AI itself.

In capital markets, concentration is also increasing: The "Magnificent Seven" (Mag7) account for about 32% of the S&P 500's market cap and contributed about 42% of total returns in 2025; meanwhile, massive funding rounds for AI startups (OpenAI $110 billion, Anthropic $30 billion) have also created enormous private wealth for a small number of founders and investors.

Energy & Data Centers

If AI becomes an energy competition, how should one invest?

This assessment is completely correct. AI has indeed become an energy game.

Those who caught this trade made significant profits. For example:

Vistra: +321%, the second-largest gain in the S&P in 2024 (after Palantir)

Constellation Energy: Stock price tripled since ChatGPT's release

NRG Energy: Rose about 95% in 2025 alone

Oklo: Up over 700% in 12 months

Nuclear energy saw a boom:

· Microsoft signed a $16 billion, 20-year PPA to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear plant

· Google signed a 500MW small modular reactor (SMR) agreement with Kairos Power

· Meta signed 6.6GW power contracts with multiple nuclear energy companies

Energy has become one of the most successful investment themes of the AI era.

In the entire data center supply chain, which parts are the hardest to scale 10x?

The bottleneck in the chip industry is CoWoS packaging technology (TSMC's Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate).

In the data center field, the biggest bottleneck may be power transformers.

· Delivery lead times approach 3 years

· A 30% supply gap emerged in 2025

· Costs have risen 150% since 2020

This 100-year-old technology has become a key constraint on the speed at which data centers can connect to the grid.

Is coal undervalued?

To some extent, yes, but far less so than copper. Coal prices actually fell about 22% in 2025, with some recovery by early 2026.

Coal companies performed decently:

· Peabody Energy: +34%

· CONSOL Energy: +37%

Meanwhile, U.S. coal-fired power generation increased by 13% by September 2025.

This was particularly evident in states with rapid data center growth:

· Ohio: +23%

· Oklahoma: +58%

Nations

Who are the winners and losers?

The clear winner is the United States.

2024 U.S. private AI investment: $109 billion (China only $9.3 billion)

Cumulative investment since 2013: $470 billion, more than the rest of the world combined

40 significant AI models released by the U.S. in 2024, compared to 15 from China

The game is not over, but for now, the U.S. is the center of AI competition.

What will happen to India's $250 billion GDP export dependency on GPT-4 tokens?

Signs are beginning to show, but it's still early. Hiring in India's IT outsourcing industry has noticeably declined. Between 2024–2025, large IT companies cut about 58,000 jobs, whereas the industry had added 360,000 employees between 2021–2023.

Will software engineers be replaced like typists in history?

Software engineers haven't moved to blue-collar jobs yet, but the career structure is already diverging:

Demand for AI engineers grew 143%

Entry-level hiring at large tech companies fell 25%

Internship positions decreased by 30%

The future choice might be: either move up to become "managers of AI agents" or shift to fields like manufacturing—after all, many factories need people who understand software to automate production lines.

Will there be a large-scale employment program similar to the "New Deal"?

Not yet.

In July 2025, the Trump administration launched the "American AI Action Plan," including:

An AI education executive order

Skills training programs

A $84 million Labor Department apprenticeship grant

But U.S. workforce training spending is only 0.1% of GDP, among the lowest in OECD countries. No plan has yet reached the scale of the original WPA (which employed 8.5 million people).

Is lifelong learning worth investing in?

This is a very abstract and personal question. But my answer is: Yes.

Inflation

If AI is truly deflationary, how would we see the signals first?

The best indicator might be AI API prices.

GPT-4 level inference cost:

Late 2022: $20 per million tokens

December 2025: $0.40 per million tokens

A 50x decrease in three years. This pace even exceeds the decline in PC computing costs or internet bandwidth costs. This is likely to be a leading indicator of service price deflation.

If demand for knowledge products keeps growing while production costs fall, how should we understand deflation?

Although AI API prices have plummeted, AI company incomes are soaring. Price decrease → usage explosion → total spending increases. Meanwhile, SaaS companies are adding 20%–37% "AI taxes" at renewal. Thus, even as the cost of producing software approaches zero, SaaS revenues are still growing.

This is similar to the computing industry in the Moore's Law era: individual products become cheaper, but the overall market size expands.

Geopolitics

Is interconnect really important?

Extremely important.

In large GPU clusters:

30%–50% of training time is spent on communication between GPUs

not on computation

For example:

Google TPUv7 Ironwood uses a 3D torus topology to connect 9,216 chips

Nvidia NVL72 connects 72 GPUs

Thus, interconnect networks are crucial for AI scaling.

If a country has more energy, can it achieve AGI with落后制程 (落后制程 - older process technology)?

Currently, it seems unlikely.

All leading AI chips use 4nm or 3nm processes:

Nvidia Blackwell

Google TPUv7

AWS Trainium3

China's Huawei Ascend 910C (SMIC 7nm) is competitive in inference but requires more chips and more energy for training. Simply increasing energy consumption to bridge the technology gap will eventually run into economic cost limitations.

What is the most likely "Taiwan event"?

The most likely is a blockade of the Taiwan Strait.

Tensions are escalating:

2024: China conducted "Joint Sword-2024B" exercises

2025: "Righteous Mission 2025" deployed over 100 aircraft and 13 warships

27 rockets launched from Fujian, with 10 falling into Taiwan's contiguous zone

Meanwhile, China's 2026–2030 five-year plan began separating the表述 of "peaceful unification" and "unification."

TSMC is also planning ahead: Eight fabs are under construction in Arizona, potentially handling 30% of advanced chip capacity in the future.

But the entire system remains in an extremely fragile balance.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, which company has been the biggest winner in the AI boom and why?

ANvidia has been the biggest winner. The article states that Nvidia captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many other companies were still losing money. Its market capitalization increased by $3.2 trillion, from $1.2T to $4.4T, a gain that was larger than the combined valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI.

QWhat is identified as the new strategic bottleneck for the AI era, and which investments performed well as a result?

AEnergy and power are identified as the new strategic bottleneck. Investments in energy companies performed exceptionally well. Examples given include Vistra (+321%), Constellation Energy (tripled since ChatGPT's release), NRG Energy (+~95% in 2025), and Oklo (+700% in 12 months). The article also highlights a major resurgence in nuclear power to meet AI's energy demands.

QHow has the cost of AI API inference changed, and what is its significance?

AThe cost of GPT-4 level inference has plummeted, falling from $20 per million tokens in late 2022 to $0.40 per million tokens by December 2025, a 50x decrease in three years. This rapid deflation in the cost of a key knowledge product is described as a leading indicator for deflation in service prices more broadly.

QWhat was the impact of AI on the city of San Francisco, according to the article?

AContrary to fears that AI might cause its decline, the article states that AI 'saved San Francisco' from becoming a declining city like Detroit. Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%, and AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Sierra signed leases for massive amounts of office space. Furthermore, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding in the first half of 2025 went to the Bay Area.

QWhich nation is identified as the clear winner in the AI competition so far, and what evidence is provided?

AThe United States is identified as the clear winner. The evidence provided is that the U.S. had $109 billion in private AI investment in 2024 (compared to China's $93 billion), has invested a cumulative $470 billion since 2013 (more than all other countries combined), and produced 40 significant AI models in 2024 (compared to China's 15).

İlgili Okumalar

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit29 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit29 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手36 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手36 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 saat önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 saat önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 saat önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 saat önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 saat önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Caldera (ERA) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Caldera (ERA) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınCaldera (ERA) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Caldera (ERA) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

488 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.07.17Güncellenme 2026.06.02

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların ERA (ERA) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片