When Vitalik Stops Blogging to Write Sci-Fi

marsbit2026-05-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, has announced a pause in his long-form technical blogging to instead write a science fiction novel exploring decentralized governance. The story, set in a fictional nation called Veridia, follows a member of a governance body that uses complex systems like quadratic voting, privacy-preserving audits, and AI-assisted decision-making to guide society through incentive structures rather than outright bans. This creative shift comes at a pivotal moment for the Ethereum ecosystem. The Ethereum Foundation has seen significant internal upheaval in 2026, with at least nine core contributors, including key protocol leaders, departing. Just days before his announcement, Vitalik published a statement addressing this turbulence, framing the Foundation as a "smaller ship" that will now focus on core principles like censorship resistance and security, while moving from a growth-oriented to a sustainability-focused organization. The novel's themes directly mirror Vitalik's long-standing technical interests in governance mechanisms. Community reactions are mixed: some see it as a thoughtful exploration of ideas through narrative, while others view the timing—amidst core team departures and a significant drop in ETH's price—as pointedly symbolic. The move is also interpreted as a personal transition, signaling Vitalik's evolving role from a central executive figure to one of many decentralized thought leaders within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: On May 27th, Vitalik Buterin announced on Farcaster that he is pausing his long-form blog writing to focus on creating a science fiction novel centered on decentralized governance. He has completed two chapters so far.

The novel is set in a fictional country called "Veridia," which operates mechanisms like quadratic voting, privacy-protecting audits, and AI-assisted decision-making. The timing of this shift is noteworthy: by 2026, at least 9 core members have already left the Ethereum Foundation, the price of ETH has fallen below the $2,100 mark, and just three days prior, Vitalik himself announced that the Foundation would become a "smaller ship."

Vitalik, the founder of Ethereum, isn't writing technical blogs anymore. He's writing a novel...

On May 27th, Vitalik Buterin posted a brief statement on Farcaster: "Instead of continuing with regular blog posts, I've decided to try writing some sci-fi about decentralized governance," along with a link to the first two chapters on his personal website.

According to a BeInCrypto report on May 27th, this marks a rare formal shift in Buterin's public writing career.

Over the past decade, his long-form articles have essentially constituted first-hand literature for the evolution of Ethereum's ideas, covering nearly all core topics from L2 scaling and DAO governance to quadratic voting. Now, he's chosen to embed these ideas into a fictional narrative instead of continuing with EIP-style technical arguments.

This choice in itself isn't surprising. But the timing is hard not to think about:

Just three days prior, he published a lengthy post on X defending the Foundation's personnel turmoil. Two weeks ago, core leads of the Foundation's protocol team had collectively departed. The price of ETH has fallen more than 57% from its peak near $5,000 in August 2025.

"Veridia" in the Novel: The Governance System of Vitalik's Ideals

We had an AI quickly read the two completed chapters to see what Vitalik really wants to express.

The story of the two chapters takes place in a fictional country called Veridia. The protagonist, Gladias, is a novice member of the "Order of Steering." This organization is the core executive body of Veridia's governance system, responsible for maintaining a sophisticated set of tax and subsidy assessment rubrics, which replace traditional legal prohibitions.

Veridia's governance logic is clear: it almost never directly bans anything. The criminal code is extremely streamlined, replaced by a social governance system driven by tax rate incentives. A band wants to sing violent songs? No one will arrest them, but they might be classified into a higher tax bracket because of it.

The specific operation of this system is worth dissecting, as it's almost a fictionalized presentation of Vitalik's technical blog posts from the past few years:

The "Order of Steering" consists of three types of roles. "Keepers" are responsible for formulating and updating the tax assessment rubrics. "Sentinels" are responsible for auditing the classification of specific enterprises. A panel of 9 is randomly selected via cryptography, divided into three groups for independent deliberation, with the median of their votes taken. "Acolytes" are the reserve pool for Keepers and Sentinels, handling lower-priority audits. The system continuously scores them, and only the top 10% performers get promoted.

Privacy protection is the underlying logic of the entire system. Members of the Order wear uniform "privacy robes" to conceal their identities and are strictly forbidden from leaking audit tasks. Anyone can submit a guess through a decentralized cryptographic network to reveal a member's identity. If correct, the member gets a salary deduction, and the whistleblower gets half as a bounty. The goal of this mechanism is to prevent bribery and external influence.

In the first chapter, the protagonist also participates in another form of public governance: public aesthetic scoring. Citizens are randomly assigned to public goods (like billboards on buses) and score them using sliders. Here, quadratic voting—something Vitalik has championed for years—appears: all votes are automatically normalized so that each person's average score is zero and variance is one. Extreme votes compress your influence on other issues. The novel's line is that this mechanism is mathematically proven optimal—voting intensity should match the intensity of your true feelings, no more, no less.

The second chapter shifts scenes to an underground educational community called Dzego, where two students travel across the city for a physics class. Dzego's survival strategy is summarized in four words: "Rooted but leaderless." Classroom locations are decrypted via an encrypted broadcast announced just before class. The teaching venue is covered in signal-blocking foil, with security protocols frequently switching cryptographic proof systems.

What's Written into the Novel Is What Can't Be Pushed Through in Reality

Looking at the novel's content alone, it's just a cleverly conceived piece of governance sci-fi. But placed back into the context of Ethereum in 2026, the parallels become clear.

The "Order of Steering" in Veridia is a decentralized, anonymous, cryptographically protected governance organization with no single authority, where members are promoted based on performance rankings. In reality, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in 2026 has experienced its most significant personnel exodus since its inception.

According to a comprehensive tally from a CoinDesk report on May 18th and an Unchained report on May 20th, at least 9 senior contributors have left or announced their impending departure from the Foundation since the start of 2026. Co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak resigned in February, serving less than a year; Operations and Writing Lead Josh Stark left in March after 7 years; Protocol Guild founder Trent Van Epps also left in April.

The impact in May was more concentrated.

Protocol Cluster co-leads Tim Beiko and Barnabé Monnot stepped down simultaneously, while Alex Stokes went on indefinite leave. Within the following week, early beacon chain design contributor Carl Beek (7-year tenure) and Julian Ma, core author of the anti-censorship mechanism FOCIL (EIP-7805), also announced their resignations.

On May 24th, just three days before announcing the novel, Vitalik posted a long thread on X responding to this personnel storm. He likened the Foundation to "a smaller ship," stating it would focus on the CROPS framework (Censorship Resistance, Centralization-resistance pressures, Openness, Privacy, Security). He acknowledged that the Foundation's original technical mission was largely complete by 2022, and it was now transitioning from an expansionary to a sustaining organization.

He also revealed that 90% of his net worth is still in ETH and that the Foundation holds only 0.16% of the total ETH supply, worth approximately $408 million.

"The Foundation is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity rather than breadth, and yes, that means we sell less ETH," Vitalik wrote. Interim Co-Executive Director Bastian Aue (who replaced Stańczak in February) is executing this transition.

Contrast this statement with Veridia's governance system in the novel: in the fiction, there's cryptographically guaranteed decentralized auditing, mathematically proven optimal quadratic voting, and AI-assisted but not human-replacing evaluation systems.

But in reality, the Foundation struggles to retain even its core R&D personnel, with governance discussions focusing on "who is leaving" and "why."

Community Reaction: The Novel Deserves a Serious Read, but the Timing Is Bittersweet

The community's reaction to Vitalik writing sci-fi itself has been relatively positive. A crypto.news report on May 27th commented that Buterin is essentially migrating his thoughts on decentralized governance from whitepapers and blog formats into speculative storytelling, using a fictional world to test the coordination, incentives, and power distribution issues he previously discussed in papers.

BeInCrypto's analysis pointed out that Vitalik has long advocated that quadratic voting and pluralistic mechanisms can dilute the influence of large token holders. The narrative format of the novel gives him space to dramatize these mechanisms within fictional cities and crisis scenarios.

His recent statement describing the Foundation as "one of many nodes" also explains why this announcement was posted on Farcaster rather than a centralized social platform.

However, more critical voices exist.

At a time when the Foundation has just lost almost all core members of its protocol team, the founder's allocation of energy is itself a signal. Vitalik himself laid the groundwork for this in his May 24th X thread—he explicitly stated that his power within the Foundation will continue to diminish, "which is what I want," and that the transition is being executed by Bastian Aue, not by him.

From this perspective, writing sci-fi is also a declaration of a role switch: he is no longer the core executor for the Foundation, but a node of thought within the Ethereum ecosystem.

This also aligns perfectly with Veridia's governance philosophy in the novel. Everything is going as planned.

İlgili Sorular

QWhy did Vitalik Buterin announce he will stop writing regular blogs and start writing a sci-fi novel?

AVitalik Buterin announced he will stop writing regular technical blogs and start writing a sci-fi novel about decentralized governance to explore his ideas on coordination, incentives, and power distribution through speculative storytelling, a shift from his usual EIP-style technical arguments.

QWhat is the name of the fictional country in Vitalik Buterin's sci-fi novel, and what is its core governance principle?

AThe fictional country in Vitalik Buterin's sci-fi novel is called Veridia. Its core governance principle is to rarely prohibit anything directly, instead using a complex tax and subsidy incentive system driven by detailed 'rubrics' to guide societal behavior, replacing traditional legal bans.

QAccording to the article, what significant real-world event in the Ethereum ecosystem is happening concurrently with Vitalik's shift to writing fiction?

AConcurrently with Vitalik's shift to writing fiction, the Ethereum Foundation is experiencing its most severe personnel exodus, with at least 9 core members, including key protocol team leaders, having left or announced their departure in 2026.

QWhat mechanism from Vitalik's previous technical writings is featured in the novel's public aesthetics scoring system?

AThe novel's public aesthetics scoring system features Quadratic Voting, a mechanism Vitalik has long advocated. In the system, votes are normalized so each person's average score is zero with a variance of one, mathematically designed to ensure voting intensity matches the true strength of feeling.

QHow did Vitalik describe the future role of the Ethereum Foundation in his May 24th post, and how does it relate to his new activity?

AIn his May 24th post, Vitalik described the Ethereum Foundation as transforming into a 'smaller ship' focused on sustainability (the CROPS framework) rather than expansion. This shift, alongside his stated desire for his own power within the EF to diminish, contextualizes his move to writing fiction as a symbolic transition from a core executor to a thought leader or 'node' within the ecosystem.

İlgili Okumalar

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

"STRC Falls Below $95: Why the Persistent Depegging and Is There Default Risk?" The article discusses the recent decline in the price of STRC, a perpetual preferred stock issued by Strategy (MSTR) designed to trade around a $100 par value. As of publication, STRC traded at $94.65, raising market concerns. STRC is described as a high-yield cash flow product, offering an 11.50% annual dividend paid monthly. Its "preferred" status grants it priority over common stock for dividends and in liquidation. Key reasons cited for the price depegging include: 1. **Bitcoin's Price Drop:** MSTR's assets are heavily tied to Bitcoin (BTC), which fell over 21% from its recent high, pressuring all Strategy-related products. 2. **Competitive Pressure:** Rival Strive Asset Management's similar product, SATA, offers daily dividends and has maintained its $100 par value with a ~13% yield. In response, Strategy has proposed changing STRC's dividend frequency from monthly to bi-weekly, pending shareholder vote. 3. **Technical Selling:** A break below $100 may have triggered algorithmic selling and stop-losses, exacerbating the decline. Regarding default risk, the analysis suggests it is currently low. Strategy founder Michael Saylor confirmed the June 2026 dividend rate remains at 11.50% with no cuts or suspensions. The company's massive reserve of 843,706 BTC provides a significant backstop for its obligations. Industry opinions are mixed. Some analysts view the BTC holdings as reliable support for dividends, while critics like Peter Schiff warn of potential dividend cuts leading to price crashes and lawsuits. Others highlight inflation risk and the company's ability to reduce dividends without a formal default. In summary, STRC's drop is attributed to BTC volatility, competition, and technical factors. While immediate default risk appears contained, the product faces challenges from market conditions and competitive dynamics.

marsbit29 dk önce

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

marsbit29 dk önce

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

A sell-off in AI-related stocks, triggered by Broadcom's disappointing earnings forecast, sent shockwaves through global markets. South Korea's KOSPI led Asia's decline, plunging 1.8% as the risks from concentrated chip stock gains and surging leveraged investments came to the fore. The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.5% following Broadcom's 14% after-hours plunge, which signaled a slower-than-expected transition to AI clients. This pullback extended Wall Street's weakness, halting the S&P 500's nine-day rally amid hawkish Fed signals and renewed Middle East tensions. South Korean authorities convened an emergency meeting, pledging "immediate measures" against market volatility and warning of record-high stock margin debt. The adjustment rippled across assets: Bitcoin fell to around $64,000, its lowest since February, while safe-haven gold rose 1% on bargain hunting. Oil prices dipped on Middle East ceasefire news. Market analysts noted the sell-off was driven by profit-taking after massive gains, particularly in chip stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix, which now dominate the KOSPI. Wall Street banks are divided on Korea's outlook, with Goldman Sachs raising its target while Citigroup and others warn of overvaluation and a potential bubble. Bridgewater's Ray Dalio noted that great technological shifts often create bubbles. Meanwhile, Fed officials' hints at potential future rate hikes added to the cautious mood ahead of key U.S. jobs data.

华尔街日报56 dk önce

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

华尔街日报56 dk önce

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit1 saat önce

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片