What should you expect from 10 February’s White House stablecoin meeting?

ambcrypto2026-02-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

White House officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto executives are meeting on 10 February to address the deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with interest-paying stablecoins being the most contentious issue. Crypto firms argue that offering yield supports innovation and user benefits, citing companies like Coinbase which earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025. Traditional banks, however, warn of a potential $6.6 trillion outflow from deposits. Another key point is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which neither side finds satisfactory. Past policy delays and meeting cancellations have triggered sharp market declines, while agreements like the GENIUS Act spurred rallies. Currently, market sentiment is nervous, with total crypto valuation dropping 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a day, and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH facing downward pressure. Analysts see this as reducing risk rather than a full market crash. Ultimately, the conflict reflects a broader struggle over the future financial system, with markets reacting strongly to regulatory uncertainty.

Inside the White House, a high-pressure struggle is reaching a turning point as government officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto founders meet on 10 February to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act.

At the center of the conflict is the issue of interest-paying stablecoins, which has become the most divisive topic in the debate.

Crypto companies argue that offering yield is a natural step towards building a modern and efficient financial system that benefits everyday users and supports innovation. For instance, companies like Coinbase, which have earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025 alone, see yield as critical to their business.

Traditional banks, however, see this as a serious threat and warn that $6.6 trillion from deposits could be drained from savings accounts.

Various other points of concern

Another major issue is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services under strict conditions.

Crypto companies say the access is too limited to support real growth and stability. Banks, meanwhile, warn that even restricted access could open the door too quickly.

As a result, the proposal fails to satisfy either side, making compromise difficult.

Past meetings and their impact on the crypto market

History shows that policy delays have often triggered sharp market reactions. Last week itself, after the 02 February meeting, the total crypto market’s value dropped from $2.64 trillion to $2.54 trillion in a very short time.

Another major shock followed on 15 January when the Senate Banking Committee suddenly canceled its vote on the CLARITY Act.

Needless to say, the market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes and wiping out billions of dollars in value.

On the other hand, when lawmakers reach an agreement, the market also recovers quickly. A strong example is the GENIUS Act, signed on 18 July 2025. It sparked a bullish rally and pushed many altcoins up by nearly 12% in just one week.

Is the market on edge right now?

At present, the market is once again waiting to see what happens next. Even before the meeting concludes, stress is already visible across the crypto market.

The sentiment was well reflected by an X user who said,

Fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest have weakened investor confidence too. As a result, the total crypto market value fell to $2.36 trillion in a single day – A decline of 1.65%.

Bitcoin [BTC] has also struggled on the charts, trading near $69,132 at press time. Ethereum [ETH] seems to be following the same trend too, dropping to around $2,040 on the back of high traders’ anxiety.

And yet, despite the recent bouts of depreciation, analysts are not calling this a major crash. Instead, they see investors actively reducing risk and shifting into a more defensive position


Final Thoughts

  • The fight over stablecoin yield is really a fight over who gets to shape the next financial system.
  • Markets are reacting not to decisions, but to uncertainty caused by repeated delays and unfinished negotiations.

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main topic of the White House meeting on February 10th?

AThe main topic is to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with a central focus on the issue of interest-paying stablecoins.

QWhy do traditional banks view interest-paying stablecoins as a threat?

ATraditional banks warn that interest-paying stablecoins could drain $6.6 trillion from savings accounts, posing a serious threat to their deposit base.

QWhat was the market reaction to the Senate Banking Committee canceling its vote on the CLARITY Act on January 15th?

AThe market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes, wiping out billions of dollars in value.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account system?

AIt is a proposed system that would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services, but under strict conditions that both crypto companies and traditional banks find unsatisfactory.

QHow did the market perform in the lead-up to the February 10th meeting?

AThe market was under stress, with the total crypto market value falling 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a single day due to weakened investor confidence and fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest.

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit51 dk önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit51 dk önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

HOUSE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHousecoin (HOUSE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Housecoin (HOUSE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

352 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.04.27Güncellenme 2026.06.02

HOUSE Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların HOUSE (HOUSE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片