What Are the Characteristics of Projects Delisted by Major Exchanges?

marsbit2026-03-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Major cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and OKX are increasingly delisting tokens, signaling a shift from expansion to contraction in asset listings. Recent delistings include projects such as FORTH, HOOK, LRC, and RDNT, many of which were once high-profile in narratives like DeFi, Layer 2, and memes. A key reason for delisting is the lack of sustainable technology or business models. Once market hype fades, these projects fail to deliver, becoming "zombie" assets with low liquidity and community engagement. Additionally, insufficient transparency—such as inactive teams, poor communication, and unclear roadmaps—has become a critical factor. Exchanges now prioritize tokens with clear governance, active development, and regular updates. This trend reflects a broader industry move towards higher-quality, compliant assets, including tokenized stocks, which offer clearer value and regulatory alignment. The delisting wave acts as a market cleanse, urging projects to maintain transparency and viability or risk removal.

Author: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

In the crypto industry, "listing" once meant the birth of another wealth creation myth, but now, it may just be a prelude to a prolonged clearing process.

On March 18, Binance announced it would cease trading and delist 8 tokens, including Ampleforth (FORTH), Hooked Protocol (HOOK), IDEX (IDEX), Loopring (LRC), Neutron (NTRN), Radiant Capital (RDNT), and others.

On March 16, Coinbase announced the delisting of 25 contract trading pairs, including REZ-PERP, BABY-PERP, GMX-PERP, T-PERP, YB-PERP, HOME-PERP, CATI-PERP, DOGS-PERP, DRIFT-PERP, and others.

On March 12, Binance Alpha announced it would remove over 21 tokens, including DGC (DecentralGPT), BNB Card (BNB Card), PFVS (Puffverse), RDO (Reddio), MILK (MilkyWay), TAT (Tell A Tale), and others.

Earlier in January, OKX announced the delisting of 7 tokens, including ULTI, GEAR, VRA, DAO, CXT, RDNT, and ELON. Additionally, Bithumb and Upbit also announced the delisting of multiple tokens.

This "delisting storm" spanning both spot and derivatives markets sends a cold and clear signal to the outside world: top-tier cryptocurrency exchanges are undergoing a paradigm shift from an "expansion phase" to a "contraction phase" in assets.

They are reassessing asset targets, establishing new token listing and delisting mechanisms based on the liquidity, quality, transparency, etc., of tokens/projects. This serves as a deterrent to other listed or potential listing projects while better protecting investor interests.

I. "Zombified" Survival Under a Glossy Exterior

It is lamentable that the "cleanup" list includes promising stars of their time, such as LRC, FORTH, NTRN, RDNT, and others.

Among them, Loopring (LRC) became a rising star in the DeFi track with its "Layer2 scaling + decentralized exchange" narrative, as well as a shining example of Chinese projects; ELON became a hot meme coin subject due to the Musk IP effect, with its market value rapidly climbing in a short time; MilkyWay (MILK) once secured $5 million in funding with the label of a Celestia liquid staking solution, backed by well-known institutions such as Polychain and Hack VC.

The crypto market in a bull market has never been short of glossy narratives. Tracks like DeFi, NFT, meme, InfoFi, and RWA have taken turns on stage. A slogan, a white paper could easily raise tens of millions in funding; a brand-new concept could support a valuation of hundreds of millions and gain favor from various top-tier exchanges.

But these seemingly glamorous projects mostly share the same fatal problem—a lack of core technology for implementation and a sustainable business model. When market heat fades and narratives are gradually disproven, the shortcomings of these projects are infinitely magnified.

For exchanges, maintaining these projects that have lost community momentum not only means huge compliance costs but also an invisible drain on platform credibility. In an era of存量博弈 (stock game), exchanges are no longer tolerating "air assets" occupying precious liquidity resources for a long time, which is also an inevitable result of the past野蛮发展 (barbaric development) stage.

Looking at these delisted projects, DeFi and gaming are the hardest-hit areas, while also covering Layer1, DAO, and other fields, which corresponds to the changes in mainstream industry narratives. More serious than delisting is that many projects have publicly announced they are no longer operating. According to RootData statistics, these include the decentralized storage platform DataHaven, DeFi options protocol Polynomial, DAO governance platform Tally, metaverse Bloktopia, incubator Colony, data analysis platform Parsec, and others.

At the same time, cryptocurrency exchanges have successively shifted their listing focus to tokenized stocks. These assets have clear business models and market competitiveness while solving the problem of limited trading hours in traditional stock exchanges. Binance, Kraken, OKX, Bitget, Bybit, Gate, and other exchanges have already supported the trading of such assets, with the latter three supporting over 100 stock assets within months, showing strong strategic ambition.

II. Transparency is Becoming a Red Line

In addition to insufficient industry momentum, lack of transparency is also a major reason for the delisting of many projects.

As regulatory efforts in the crypto industry continue to strengthen and investor risk awareness increases, exchanges' requirements for token project transparency are becoming increasingly strict. According to official news, Binance has clearly incorporated "the level of public communication, community engagement, and transparency of the project team" and "the team's commitment to the project" into the evaluation conditions for token health.

This means that having clear team and roadmap information, a sound information disclosure mechanism, and active community communication channels are crucial for any token. But for many projects, the摆烂 (slacking off) state of "lying flat after listing" has become an awkward and harsh reality.

According to the transparency score recently launched by RootData, most of the tokens delisted by Binance and other exchanges in this round have a transparency score below 70%, with varying degrees of problems such as insufficient disclosure of project progress and missing team members. Stagnant community communication has become the norm, which leads to a significant weakening of user attention to the project and even trading willingness, forming a vicious cycle of insufficient trading volume and liquidity.

Taking Ultiverse, invested in by YZi Labs, as an example, the project has hardly posted any tweets since January, only reposting a few messages, and several core team members have done the same.

This "black box" operation not only challenges the risk defense line of exchanges but also directly harms the right to know of retail investors. The collective "great clearance" by exchanges is essentially a supply-side reform targeting "bad money," allocating more resources to assets with high transparency and solid competitiveness. In this way, exchanges are forming an institutional deterrent to on-platform projects: transparency is no longer a soft "bonus point" but a must-have for survival.

Against the backdrop of accelerated penetration by traditional capital and the gradual clarification of global regulatory frameworks, the competitive dimension of exchanges has undergone a qualitative change. The focus is no longer on trading scale and user numbers but on the quality of asset targets and the compliance of the platform. The synchronized steps of top exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and OKX预示 (foreshadow) that a "dehydration" cycle to squeeze out the泡沫 (bubble) has already begun.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the main reasons for major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase to delist certain tokens recently?

AThe main reasons include lack of liquidity, poor project quality, insufficient transparency, and failure to meet the exchanges' updated listing criteria. Many delisted projects were deemed to have unsustainable business models, low community engagement, or were effectively 'zombie' projects with no active development.

QWhich types of crypto projects were most affected by the recent delisting wave?

ADeFi and gaming projects were the hardest hit, but the delistings also affected Layer 1 protocols, DAOs, and meme coins. This reflects a shift in industry narratives and a cleanup of projects that failed to deliver on their promises or maintain operational transparency.

QHow has the strategy of cryptocurrency exchanges changed regarding asset listing?

AExchanges have shifted from an 'expansion phase' to a 'contraction phase,' moving away from listing numerous speculative assets. They are focusing more on high-quality assets with clear value propositions, such as tokenized stocks, and are implementing stricter evaluation mechanisms based on liquidity, project commitment, and transparency.

QWhy is transparency becoming a critical factor for token listings?

ATransparency is now a survival necessity due to increasing regulatory scrutiny and investor demand for accountability. Exchanges evaluate factors like public communication, community engagement, and team commitment. Projects with low transparency scores, inactive teams, or poor disclosure practices are at high risk of being delisted to protect investors and maintain platform credibility.

QWhat signal does this delisting trend send to the broader cryptocurrency market?

AThe coordinated delistings by major exchanges signal a market-wide 'de-leveraging' and 'dehydration' cycle, moving away from speculative hype towards fundamentals. It emphasizes that exchanges are prioritizing asset quality, sustainability, and compliance, which could deter low-quality projects and encourage higher industry standards.

İlgili Okumalar

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

U.S. markets reached record highs on June 2nd, but the real story was the intensifying AI arms race, now pivoting from chip supremacy to a scramble for capital to fund compute infrastructure. The day highlighted two stark realities: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's endorsement of Marvell Technology as the "next trillion-dollar company" at Computex fueled a historic 32.5% surge, adding $47 billion to its value. Conversely, Alphabet announced its first equity raise in two decades—an $80 billion plan—signaling that even its massive cash flow can't keep pace with soaring AI capital expenditures, forecast to exceed $180 billion in 2026. While the S&P 500 closed above 7,600 for the first time, led by tech and semiconductor stocks (SOXX +5.79%), sector performance was mixed. Alphabet's 4% drop dragged down communications services, illustrating market anxiety over the unsustainable cost of the AI buildout. Hewlett Packard Enterprise soared 25% on stellar earnings, proving AI's benefits extend beyond chip designers to infrastructure providers. Beneath the index highs, concerns linger over extreme concentration in a few AI stocks and geopolitical tensions. The focus now shifts to upcoming economic data, particularly Friday's nonfarm payrolls, which could challenge the market's current "ignore rates, chase AI" mentality.

marsbit4 dk önce

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

marsbit4 dk önce

Variant: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and ZCash Highly Likely to Become Major Stores of Value

At Variant, our investment philosophy centers on enabling individuals to own their money, identity, and data. We believe all tokens fall into two categories: stores of value (SOV) or equity-like instruments. The SOV framework is particularly useful for evaluating Layer 1 (L1) blockchains, which are major monetary coordination protocols. A good store of value should possess: 1) Technical durability, 2) Scarcity, 3) Censorship resistance, 4) Economic productivity, 5) Strong memetics, and 6) Liquidity. The total addressable market for SOV assets is massive, with gold alone valued at $31 trillion. Three L1 assets stand out as prime candidates for becoming major stores of value: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and ZCash (ZEC). Bitcoin excels in memetic dominance as "digital gold." Ethereum demonstrates superior technical durability and adaptability through its upgradeable roadmap. ZCash offers exceptional censorship resistance and privacy via its shielded transactions. While digital SOVs outperform traditional ones like gold on many metrics, they still represent a small fraction of the overall SOV market, presenting a significant growth opportunity.

marsbit47 dk önce

Variant: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and ZCash Highly Likely to Become Major Stores of Value

marsbit47 dk önce

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit48 dk önce

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit48 dk önce

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit52 dk önce

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit52 dk önce

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报55 dk önce

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报55 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures