‘We will never sell’: Metaplanet stands firm as Bitcoin losses top $1.2B

ambcrypto2026-02-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Metaplanet, a Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm, has seen its holdings of 35,012 BTC incur over $1.2 billion in unrealized losses amid the market downturn. Despite the significant paper loss, CEO Simon Gerovich firmly stated the company will never sell its Bitcoin, emphasizing a strategy focused on accumulation and increasing Bitcoin per share. He expressed cautious optimism that Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he acknowledged market uncertainty. In the short term, demand for put options indicates some traders are betting on further downside, targeting $58K or lower. However, whale accumulation of 200,000 BTC in the past month may help stabilize prices, though a sustained recovery likely requires increased retail demand rather than leveraged trading.

Simon Gerovich, the CEO of Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm Metaplanet, has acknowledged that the ongoing crypto rout has been painful.

In late 2025, the firm’s stash (35,012 BTC) saw a paper loss of $619 million following the BTC price crash. The unrealized loss has now doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

However, Gerovich assured that the firm has no plan to offload its stash if the crypto winter deepens, adding that,

“Our strategy remains unchanged. We exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, which we increased by over 500% in 2025. We will never sell our Bitcoin.”

On Bitcoin’s next direction, Gerovich, like Fidelity and most analysts, was cautiously optimistic of a potential market bottom around $60K.

“I personally believe Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though I hold that view with humility. Nobody knows.”

But he maintained that BTC will likely print a new all-time high and slammed critics of Bitcoin treasury firms.

Bitcoin sees spike in downside bets

In the short term, however, demand for downside protection remained strong, with some eyeing a potential BTC price dip below $60K.

According to the Options tracking platform, Laevitas, there was a surge in bearish bets, eyeing $58K and $55K in late February and March.

“Downside protection remains in demand. Over the past few hours: 1864 BTC $58K puts bought for 27FEB26 ($687.72k), 276 BTC $58K puts bought for 6MAR26 ($205.14K). Also, 600 BTC $55K puts bought for 27MAR26 ($551.18K) on Feb 17.”

The above positioning was interesting because the broader put/call ratios were still constructive and leaned bullish.

This underscored that, despite the potential for a rebound, big players remained cautious that another leg down could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

Even so, Bitfinex analysts noted that whales have scooped up 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days. According to them, the ongoing whale accumulation reinforced their price-range outlook, adding to that,

“That can stabilise price, but upside is usually slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases. Confirmation is spot-led continuation, not leverage-led spikes.”


Final Summary

  • Metaplanet CEO was cautiously optimistic that BTC could bottom out above $60K, adding that the Bitcoin treasury firm won’t sell its BTC holdings.
  • Whales scooped 200K BTC and could drive the sideways structure above $60K, but there was increasing demand for downside protection.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Metaplanet's current strategy regarding its Bitcoin holdings despite the unrealized losses?

AMetaplanet's strategy remains unchanged; they exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, and they will never sell their Bitcoin.

QHow much has Metaplanet's unrealized loss on its Bitcoin investment grown as of February?

AMetaplanet's unrealized loss on its 35,012 BTC has doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

QAccording to the CEO, what price level does he believe may be a potential floor for Bitcoin?

AThe CEO believes Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he holds that view with humility.

QWhat does the surge in bearish bets, as reported by Laevitas, indicate about market sentiment?

AThe surge in bearish bets, such as puts targeting $58K and $55K, indicates strong demand for downside protection and caution among some big players that another price decline could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

QHow much Bitcoin have whales accumulated in the past 30 days, and what is the expected impact on price according to Bitfinex analysts?

AWhales have accumulated 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days, which Bitfinex analysts say can stabilize the price, but upside movement is expected to be slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases.

İlgili Okumalar

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit22 dk önce

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit22 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手38 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手38 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit38 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit38 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片