Wall Street Bets Big on RWA: BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, Morgan Stanley Are Moving Financial Markets On-Chain

marsbit2026-05-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Wall Street is fully embracing Real World Assets (RWA), with giants like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and JPMorgan Chase actively moving traditional financial markets onto the blockchain. The global RWA market has now surpassed $30 billion. BlackRock continues to expand its tokenization efforts, recently filing a new structure with the SEC that integrates blockchain-based fund shares directly into the regulated U.S. fund registry system, bridging the gap between on-chain and traditional finance. Its BUIDL fund, launched with Securitize, has grown to approximately $2.3 billion in assets. Franklin Templeton has partnered with Kraken's parent company to explore tokenizing traditional financial products, including stocks and yield-generating instruments. This shift highlights traditional finance's growing acceptance of blockchain as a core component of the future financial system, not just a niche market. JPMorgan Chase is advancing its on-chain dollar liquidity system by filing for a second tokenized money market fund (JLTXX) on Ethereum. This move aims to create a complete on-chain USD ecosystem where digital dollars can earn yield, moving beyond simple stablecoin payments. The trend signals a broader shift in crypto from speculative assets to building new financial infrastructure. RWA tokenization is enhancing efficiency through real-time settlement, transparency, and 24/7 global markets, positioning blockchain for a foundational role in the future of global finance.

Author: Climber, CryptoPulse Labs

In recent years, the crypto industry has experienced multiple waves of trends such as DeFi, NFTs, and Meme coins. However, what truly prompted Wall Street's large-scale entry was not the highly volatile crypto assets, but RWA (Real World Assets). Currently, the global RWA market size has exceeded $30 billion.

In recent days, traditional financial giants like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and JPMorgan Chase have made successive moves, ranging from tokenized funds and on-chain money market products to tokenized stocks and on-chain yield tools. Wall Street is gradually moving traditional financial markets onto the blockchain.

The true significance behind this is not merely about launching a few on-chain products; it more closely resembles a foundational structural upgrade of the global financial system.

I. BlackRock's Continued Expansion: On-Chain Funds Begin to Integrate with the Traditional Financial System

In this wave of tokenization, BlackRock's moves remain the most closely watched.

On May 12th, BlackRock once again filed a new application with the U.S. SEC for a tokenized fund structure, continuing to choose the digital asset platform Securitize to provide on-chain infrastructure support.

The most significant focus this time is not just putting a fund on-chain, but the formal integration of on-chain assets with the traditional financial regulatory system.

According to the latest structure, the ownership records of on-chain fund shares will be integrated with regulated transfer agent systems and investor admission frameworks.

This means that fund shares held by users on-chain in the future will no longer be just data on the blockchain but will be able to directly enter the U.S. regulated fund registration system.

In the past, many traditional institutions, while interested in blockchain, remained concerned about how on-chain assets could meet regulatory requirements. Now, BlackRock is attempting to directly incorporate on-chain assets into the traditional financial framework, indicating that the institutional wall between on-chain finance and traditional finance is being slowly dismantled.

In fact, BlackRock has long been laying the groundwork in the tokenization market.

As early as 2024, BlackRock's BUIDL fund, launched in partnership with Securitize, became one of the most successful tokenized product cases in the entire industry. Its asset size has now grown to approximately $2.3 billion and serves as an important symbol of institutional entry into on-chain finance.

Many used to think tokenization was just a repackaging. However, what Wall Street truly values is the financial efficiency brought by blockchain.

The traditional financial market involves numerous intermediaries, from banks and brokerages to clearing institutions, each layer representing time costs and fees. Blockchain's greatest advantage is its ability to enable real-time settlement, transparent record-keeping, and 24/7 circulation on a global scale.

For large asset management institutions, if funds, bonds, and money market products can all be tokenized in the future, the operational efficiency of the entire financial market could be fundamentally rewritten.

II. Franklin Templeton Partners with Kraken: Accelerated Implementation of Tokenized Stocks and On-Chain Yield Products

Besides BlackRock, Franklin Templeton's recent moves are also noteworthy.

Recently, Franklin Templeton announced a partnership with Payward, the parent company of the crypto exchange Kraken, to jointly explore opportunities for on-chain tokenization of traditional financial products.

This collaboration covers a wide range of areas, including tokenized stocks, compliant custody, actively managed yield products, and institutional-grade crypto liquidity services.

The most critical point is that the two parties are researching launching on-chain versions of Franklin Templeton's financial products. In other words, some traditional funds, yield products, and even securities may circulate directly in the form of on-chain tokens in the future.

This represents a very clear industry shift: previously, it was the crypto industry actively approaching traditional finance, but now traditional finance is also actively moving toward the crypto market.

Especially Kraken's recent tokenized stock business, xStocks, has validated market demand. Data shows that cumulative trading volume for this business has exceeded $30 billion since its launch last year.

This indicates that the global market's demand for on-chain securities trading is not merely conceptual but genuinely exists.

This is because traditional securities markets have many issues, such as fixed trading hours, complex cross-border investments, and long settlement cycles. The greatest advantage of tokenized stocks is enabling securities to circulate in real-time and be traded globally on-chain, similar to stablecoins.

Meanwhile, Franklin Templeton itself is one of the traditional asset managers most actively embracing the crypto industry. Currently, it has launched multiple crypto ETF products, issued the tokenized money market fund BENJI, and partnered with Ondo Finance to develop on-chain financial products.

From these actions, it's clear that more and more traditional financial institutions no longer view blockchain as a fringe market but are beginning to see it as an important component of the future financial system.

III. JPMorgan Chase Advances On-Chain Money Market Funds: An On-Chain Dollar System Is Taking Shape

Compared to BlackRock and Franklin Templeton, JPMorgan Chase's approach leans more toward building an on-chain dollar liquidity system.

On May 12th, JPMorgan Chase filed paperwork for the JPMorgan OnChain Liquidity-Token Money Market Fund (ticker: JLTXX), planning to launch a second tokenized money market fund.

This fund will issue digital tokens on the Ethereum blockchain, with the underlying assets primarily consisting of U.S. Treasuries and repurchase agreements.

This type of product is particularly noteworthy because money market funds are essentially akin to institutional versions of stablecoins.

They are backed by high-liquidity, low-risk assets like cash and U.S. Treasuries while also offering some yield. Now, more institutions are attempting to move these assets on-chain.

The reason is quite simple.

Stablecoins solve the payment problem, but on-chain money market funds solve the yield problem.

In the past, large amounts of on-chain dollar capital could only sit in stablecoin accounts, making it difficult to earn stable returns. But if users can directly invest their on-chain dollars into tokenized money market funds in the future, the entire on-chain dollar financial system will form a complete closed loop.

This is also why more traditional banks are beginning to pay attention to on-chain finance. They are realizing that blockchain is not just a type of encryption technology but may become a new type of settlement network for the future global financial system.

Over the past year, tokenized U.S. Treasuries have become one of the fastest-growing sectors in the entire RWA market. JPMorgan Chase's continued advancement of on-chain money market funds also signifies that large banks are beginning to formally participate in building the on-chain dollar system.

Conclusion

Looking back over the past few years in the crypto industry, one can see that the entire market is undergoing very noticeable changes.

In the early days, the industry discussed more about blockchain performance, DeFi mining, NFT hype, and Meme coin speculation. Now, more capital and institutions are focusing on on-chain U.S. Treasuries, tokenized funds, on-chain securities, and institutional-grade financial infrastructure.

This means the crypto industry is gradually shifting from a high-risk speculative market toward building a new type of financial system. And RWA is becoming one of the most important narratives in this phase.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is RWA and why is it attracting significant interest from Wall Street institutions like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and J.P. Morgan?

ARWA stands for Real World Assets, referring to the tokenization of traditional financial assets like funds, bonds, and stocks on a blockchain. Wall Street institutions are attracted to RWA because it offers the potential for increased financial efficiency, including real-time global settlement, transparent record-keeping, 24/7 liquidity, and reduced reliance on intermediaries, which can lower costs and time delays.

QAccording to the article, what is the key innovation in BlackRock's recent SEC filing for a tokenized fund structure?

AThe key innovation is that the ownership records of the on-chain fund shares will be integrated with regulated transfer agent systems and investor eligibility frameworks. This means on-chain holdings are no longer just blockchain data but are directly incorporated into the U.S. regulated fund registration system, helping to bridge the gap between on-chain finance and traditional regulatory frameworks.

QWhat specific areas are Franklin Templeton and Kraken exploring in their partnership, and what does this signify for the industry?

AFranklin Templeton and Kraken are exploring tokenized stocks, compliant custody, actively managed yield products, and institutional-grade crypto liquidity services. This signifies a shift where traditional finance is actively moving towards the crypto market, rather than crypto trying to fit into traditional finance. It shows that on-chain securities trading is seen as having real demand and potential.

QHow does J.P. Morgan's on-chain money market fund (JLTXX) differ in focus from the products launched by BlackRock and Franklin Templeton?

AJ.P. Morgan's on-chain money market fund focuses more on building the on-chain U.S. dollar liquidity system. While BlackRock's fund integrates ownership with traditional systems and Franklin Templeton explores tokenized stocks, J.P. Morgan's product addresses the yield problem for on-chain dollars, allowing them to earn returns on assets like U.S. Treasuries, thereby helping to create a complete on-chain dollar financial ecosystem.

QWhat broader trend does the article suggest is happening in the crypto industry, with RWA as a key driver?

AThe article suggests the crypto industry is evolving from a high-risk, speculative market focused on areas like DeFi yield farming, NFTs, and memecoins, towards building a new type of financial system infrastructure. RWA is a key driver in this shift, representing a move towards tokenized real-world financial instruments like government bonds, funds, and securities, which are attracting institutional capital and participation.

İlgili Okumalar

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit55 dk önce

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit55 dk önce

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手55 dk önce

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手55 dk önce

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 saat önce

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片