Vanguard Group Enters with $700 Million, Has MSTR Hit Bottom?

Odaily星球日报2026-01-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Pioneer Group Invests $707 Million, Has MSTR Bottomed Out? On January 20th, MicroStrategy (MSTR) announced its largest single Bitcoin purchase of 2025, acquiring 22,305 BTC for approximately $2.13 billion. This move comes as MSTR's stock price has fallen nearly 200% from its high, sparking intense market skepticism regarding its high leverage, refinancing capabilities, and its role as a "Bitcoin central bank" caught in a monetary war between traditional and emerging financial systems. Amidst this extreme pessimism and fears of potential index exclusion triggering massive sell-offs, several key investors have begun taking significant long positions, suggesting a potential market bottom is forming. Global asset manager Vanguard, with over $12 trillion in AUM, invested approximately $707.5 million into MSTR across two of its index funds. This is largely seen as passive, rules-based buying due to MSTR's growing market cap fitting certain index criteria, but it signals MSTR's growing institutional acceptance as a compliant Bitcoin proxy. In a more cautious move, the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) disclosed a small $3.1 million position in MSTR, representing a tentative exploration of Bitcoin exposure by a conservative public pension fund. Actively managed funds are also making bold bets. Jane Street Group increased its MSTR shareholding by 51.72% and built a large call option position. Capital International Investors boosted its stake by over 713%. BitM...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

On January 20, MicroStrategy (MSTR) once again disclosed an acquisition of 22,305 bitcoins, valued at approximately $2.13 billion. This marks the largest single purchase by MicroStrategy since 2025.

Over the past few months, MicroStrategy's stock price has fallen continuously from its high of $457, with a decline nearing 200%. Skepticism surrounding MicroStrategy has also intensified. From high leverage and refinancing capabilities to the transmission mechanism between Bitcoin price volatility and stock price, almost all negative narratives have been revisited. Particularly after the mNAV fell below 1, voices criticizing MSTR have been incessant.

Amid this skepticism, a widely circulated article titled "The Fed vs. The Treasury: The Currency War Behind Bitcoin's Plunge" even compared MicroStrategy to a "Bitcoin central bank," suggesting it is caught in a博弈 (game) between the traditional financial system (the Fed, Wall Street, JPMorgan) and the emerging system (the Treasury, stablecoins, Bitcoin-collateralized financing), and accused institutions like JPMorgan of systematically shorting MSTR through methods like delayed settlements and options market suppression.

Simultaneously, index provider MSCI signaled that it might remove MSTR from its indices. If this happens, it could theoretically trigger passive selling of approximately $8.8 billion; MicroStrategy's own calculations also show that, in extreme scenarios, it might trigger $2.8 billion in stock liquidations.

Panic seems to be escalating...... While the market worried about whether it would "sell Bitcoin" or "be able to refinance again," MicroStrategy chose to act in the clearest and most powerful manner, embodying the label of a staunch Bitcoin believer.

The Bottom Is Not a Price, But a Moment When Certain Behaviors Begin to Appear

In an article published on December 3rd titled "$1.44 Billion Dividend Reserve Fund Landed, Stock Price Plunged 10% Instead, What Is MicroStrategy's Real Problem?", Odaily Planet Daily pointed out: MicroStrategy's highly concentrated asset structure, reliance on capital market refinancing, and valuation model deeply tied to Bitcoin's price are its endogenous genes. Precisely because of this, when market trends reverse, these structural characteristics do not "suddenly fail"; instead, they amplify volatility more drastically. The rapid price decline, in turn, reinforces the pessimistic narrative, causing risks to be magnified and repeatedly discussed on an emotional level.

Therefore, when almost everyone is extremely bearish and the news is full of negative reports, it often means that the bad news might be getting digested, or may even already be digested. This is why Buffett's quote, "Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful," is repeatedly cited.

Thus, what is worth observing in the market is not whether these negatives are valid, but rather, whether 'lone brave' investors choosing to go long on MSTR have already emerged at the most extreme point of sentiment, while the bad news still persists.

The answer is: Yes, and there's more than one type.

Vanguard Group: Institutional Funds Begin to Intervene

Vanguard is one of the world's largest asset management companies, with assets under management exceeding $12 trillion. Since the beginning of 2026, two of its index funds have successively disclosed purchases of MSTR, with a combined increase of approximately $707.5 million.

It is important to emphasize that this is not an active expression of a bullish stance, as most of Vanguard's assets are adjusted automatically based on changes in index constituents, meaning the current buying is likely driven by passive index tracking requirements.

On January 20, the Vanguard Value Index Fund (VVIAX) disclosed its first purchase of MSTR stock, totaling 1.23 million shares, valued at approximately $202.5 million. This is a value-oriented index fund focused on large-cap companies considered undervalued by the market, with core screening criteria including low P/E ratio, P/B ratio, and higher dividend yield, among other value characteristics.

The same situation also appeared in another mid-cap index fund, the Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX). The fund disclosed its purchase of 2.91 million shares of MSTR, valued at approximately $505 million. MSTR's continued market cap growth made it eligible for inclusion in the mid-cap index, forcing the fund to increase its holdings to match the index weight.

Overall, Vanguard's two purchases are likely mostly due to the tracking behavior of index funds rather than active investment. But it is precisely in this inflow of "viewless" capital that a key change is occurring: MSTR is being systematically incorporated into the traditional asset allocation system, becoming a compliant vehicle for Bitcoin risk exposure.

Pension Funds' Exploration: The Signal Behind Small Positions

In the more conservative realm of pension funds, the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) disclosed on December 31, 2025, that it held 17,900 shares of MSTR, valued at approximately $3.1 million, accounting for 0.02% of its roughly $16 billion in assets.

This is not an aggressive allocation; in fact, the position is extremely small.

But LASERS is the retirement system for public employees in Louisiana, managing retirement assets for over 100,000 state employees (including teachers and other public workers), with a total size of approximately $15.6 billion. The fund's investment portfolio is primarily concentrated in US large-cap tech stocks like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. The appearance of MSTR in such a portfolio, can we consider it as: Indirectly gaining Bitcoin exposure through a public company structure is beginning to be seen as a discussable, testable option by some state-level public funds. Although LASERS's holding of MSTR is small, it represents a cautious and preliminary interest in crypto assets.

When Active Management Funds Choose to Stand on the Other Side

Unlike passive index funds, the choices of active management funds are closer to a direct judgment of risk and return.

At the end of Q4 2025, globally renowned quantitative trading and market-making firm Jane Street Group disclosed that its MSTR holdings increased by 51.72%, with the number of shares rising from approximately 11.0588 million to 16.7784 million, while simultaneously holding a large call options position.

In the same quarter, Capital International Investors also disclosed that its MSTR holdings increased by 713.07%, with the number of shares rising from approximately 1.5589 million to 12.6749 million.

Furthermore, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes stated that his core trading strategy this quarter was going long on MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Metaplanet, using them as high-leverage tools to bet on Bitcoin's trajectory.

Several asset management firms, including Bernstein, TD Cowen, and The Benchmark Company, also maintained their Buy ratings on MSTR. For instance, TD Cowen stated that although short-term yields are under pressure, related metrics are expected to improve in fiscal year 2027 as Bitcoin prices recover.

Finally

CoinDesk analyst James Van Straten proposed a noteworthy perspective: In this cycle, MicroStrategy (MSTR) has absorbed about 75% of the drawdown, thereby allowing Bitcoin itself to avoid a decline of the same magnitude, as volatility was transferred from spot Bitcoin to MSTR common stock.

Simultaneously, Michael Saylor's large-scale stock issuance at around 1x mNAV essentially acted as the ultimate risk absorber. At this valuation level, new incoming risk was transferred to investors willing to buy MSTR at that price level, rather than continuing to pressure the Bitcoin spot market, thus somewhat inhibiting the formation of a bear market.

The significance of this perspective lies in redefining the relationship between MSTR and Bitcoin. MSTR is no longer just a high-leverage proxy for Bitcoin; in the current market structure, it is gradually evolving into an intermediary layer that bears, transmits, and releases Bitcoin's volatility. Due to its stock having higher liquidity, mature short-selling mechanisms, and rich options tools, when market risk appetite declines, investors might prefer to express their risk assessment of Bitcoin by selling or hedging MSTR, rather than directly selling Bitcoin spot.

Of course, these institutions and individuals choosing to go long on MSTR may not necessarily be correct. But their very existence is worth serious observation. Because the structural bottom of the market is often not born after sentiment improves, but is born at the moment when sentiment remains extreme, yet some have already chosen to act contrarily.

And observing investor behavior regarding MSTR at this stage is essentially also observing how they view Bitcoin's risk, expectations, and cycle position.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the significance of Vanguard's investment in MSTR, and how much did they invest?

AVanguard, one of the world's largest asset managers, invested approximately $707.5 million in MSTR through two of its index funds. This investment is significant because it represents institutional, passive index-tracking capital flowing into MSTR, signaling its growing integration into traditional asset allocation frameworks as a compliant vehicle for Bitcoin exposure.

QAccording to the article, what role does MSTR play in the broader Bitcoin market during a downturn?

AThe article suggests that MSTR acts as a risk absorption layer for Bitcoin. It absorbed about 75% of the drawdown in this cycle, meaning volatility was transferred from spot Bitcoin to MSTR's common stock. By issuing shares near 1x mNAV, MSTR became the ultimate risk absorber, preventing further downward pressure on the spot Bitcoin market.

QWhich active investment firms significantly increased their positions in MSTR, as mentioned in the article?

AJane Street Group increased its MSTR holdings by 51.72% and held a substantial number of call options. Capital International Investors increased its stake by 713.07%. Additionally, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes stated that going long on MSTR and Metaplanet was a core part of his trading strategy.

QWhat was one of the major risks or negative signals discussed regarding MSTR's future?

AA major risk discussed was the potential for MSCI to remove MSTR from its indexes. If this happened, it could theoretically trigger approximately $8.8 billion in passive selling. MSTR's own calculations also showed that an extreme scenario could trigger $2.8 billion in stock liquidations.

QHow does the article define a market bottom' for an asset like MSTR?

AThe article posits that a bottom is not a specific price point, but a moment when certain behaviors begin to appear. It is characterized by extreme pessimism and pervasive bad news, yet also by the emergence of 'lonely brave' investors and institutions who start to take contrarian, long positions in the asset.

İlgili Okumalar

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist9 dk önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist9 dk önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 saat önce

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures