USELESS jumps 17% as whales load up – Why THIS support is KEY!

ambcrypto2026-03-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

USELESS Coin surged over 17% in 24 hours, significantly outperforming the broader crypto market. The rally was driven by substantial capital inflows from top traders, whales, and new wallets. Data showed a 3x spike in net flows from top traders and a 1.6x increase in whale activity, while fresh wallets added $351K—a 220% rise. The price moved from a key support level at $0.036 to above $0.045 but began pulling back. Technical indicators suggest the coin is trading in a sideways range, with a break above $0.045 potentially leading to $0.055, while a drop below $0.036 could trigger further declines. The memecoin remains in a critical decision zone.

Useless Coin [USELESS] was among the best-performing memecoins during the day as the crypto markets rebounded following the death of Iran’s supreme leader. USELESS rallied over 17% in 24 hours, outpacing the entire crypto market, which rose by 4.71%.

As war tensions cooled off, capital was flowing into the memecoin alongside others like Bitcoin [BTC], which shot up to $67K. Hence, who was responsible for this capital injection that day?

Capital inflows surging

Data from Nansen AI showed that buying and liquidity had exploded over the past day.

For instance, the Top PnL traders loaded $75K in net flows, which was a spike of 3x from the average daily inflows. The simultaneous purchases by four wallets in this bracket indicated coordinated conviction.

Whales were not left behind either.

Their net flow of $60K exceeded their normal buying by 1.6X as holdings grew by $2 million, reaching $77 million. These orders came in bits that averaged over 340K USELESS coins for each whale.

New capital was also embracing USELESS despite its “futility.”

This is because fresh wallets added $351K, which was a spike of more than 220%.

Additionally, the holdings of 4.1 million USELESS tokens remained untouched by smart money. The exchange outflows and dormancy in smart money wallets indicated less immediate sell pressure.

Wintermute supported the memecoin’s active trading liquidity. This was despite the selling of bots when the price hit $0.045.

All this capital inflow explained why the memecoin rallied so hard. Will the rally be sustainable going forward?

Will USELESS Coin continue to see more upside?

On the charts, the day’s rally was evident from a low of $0.036 to just above $0.045. The lower support level of the sideways range at $0.036 coincided with an order block created on the 14th of February.

The whole range movement was about 29%, though USELESS had started to pull back at press time. The memecoin looked headed toward $0.036 again, and seller momentum was building, as seen in the MACD.

Additionally, the Choppiness Index (CHOP) was rising, at 49.26, indicating the current rally was losing its trendiness. This reinforced that USELESS was still trading in a sideways range.

Breaking above the $0.045 zone could propel it to $0.055, while a breakdown below $0.036 would amplify the drop. However, there was a previous resistance at $0.05, as analyzed earlier.

Altogether, the memecoin was trading inside a key decision area where a breakout in either direction would determine its next trajectory.

Final Summary

USELESS rallies more than 17% amid capital inflow from the Top PnL traders, whales, and fresh wallets.
The price of USELESS Coin faced two critical tests at the $0.036 and $0.045 levels.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the percentage increase in USELESS Coin's price in 24 hours, and how did it outperform the broader crypto market?

AUSELESS Coin rallied over 17% in 24 hours, significantly outpacing the entire crypto market, which rose by only 4.71%.

QAccording to Nansen AI data, what was the net flow from Top PnL traders and how did it compare to their average daily activity?

AThe Top PnL traders loaded $75K in net flows, which was a spike of 3 times (3x) from their average daily inflows.

QWhat are the two critical price levels that the article identifies as key tests for USELESS Coin's future price trajectory?

AThe two critical price levels are the support at $0.036 and the resistance at $0.045.

QWhat does a rising Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49.26 indicate about the current market trend for USELESS?

AA rising Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49.26 indicates that the current rally is losing its trendiness and that the price is still trading in a sideways range.

QWhat did the significant spike in inflows from 'fresh wallets' demonstrate about new investor interest in USELESS?

AFresh wallets added $351K, a spike of more than 220%, demonstrating that new capital was embracing the memecoin despite its name implying futility.

İlgili Okumalar

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit23 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit23 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手30 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手30 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 saat önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 saat önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 saat önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 saat önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 saat önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures