US Watchdogs Submit Crypto, Prediction Markets Rule Plans For White House Review

bitcoinist2026-03-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-06 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

US financial regulators, the SEC and CFTC, have submitted rule proposals to the White House for review, aiming to regulate crypto assets and prediction markets. The SEC’s proposal focuses on applying federal securities laws to crypto assets, potentially establishing a taxonomy for clearer classification and oversight. The CFTC also advanced a rulemaking notice for prediction markets, seeking to set clear standards. Both agencies are collaborating under "Project Crypto" to ensure coherent regulation, prevent market fragmentation, and encourage innovation within U.S. jurisdiction. Officials emphasized the need for clear rules to avoid driving markets offshore.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have submitted rule proposals to the White House to oversee the crypto industry and prediction markets, advancing their efforts to provide clarity and regulate emerging markets.

SEC Advances Crypto Taxonomy Plans

This week, Wall Street’s main financial regulators, the SEC and the CFTC, stepped up their efforts to provide formal rules and fully establish a welcoming approach by presenting their rule plans for crypto assets and prediction markets to the White House for review, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday.

Independent agencies such as the SEC and the CFTC weren’t previously mandated to submit new rules to the White House for review, the news media outlet noted. However, in 2025, the Trump administration announced that all executive branch agencies, including US financial regulators, were expected to comply with this requirement.

The White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) website shows that the agency received a crypto regulatory measure from the SEC on Tuesday regarding the “Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets.”

Bloomberg reported that the commission-level guidance could be related to the taxonomy of crypto assets. An agency spokesperson pointed to previous comments from the SEC’s Chairman Paul Atkins.

Last month, Atkins proposed developing formal guidelines for token classification, in line with the crypto market structure bill, emphasizing that regulatory clarity for digital assets is long overdue.

The agency was set to examine a token taxonomy to define digital assets more accurately and clarify the rules that apply. This could establish categories for crypto assets, determining SEC or CFTC oversight and influencing how firms register, disclose information, and operate.

The SEC’s Chair has advocated for Congress to enact legislation for “future-proof” measures, but has also acknowledged that the agency has substantial authority to proceed with regulations if the market structure bill fails to advance.

CFTC-SEC Push To Foster Regulated Innovation

Notably, the CFTC has also been collaborating with the SEC to bring “coordination, coherence, and a unified approach to the federal oversight of crypto asset markets” through their joint “Project Crypto” initiative.

The sister agencies recently outlined their plan to clarify jurisdictional boundaries, eliminate redundant compliance requirements, and reduce regulatory fragmentation through their collaboration.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig explained that the agencies aim to ensure that “innovation takes root on American soil, under American law, and in service of American investors, customers, and businesses.”

As part of these efforts, the CFTC submitted an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on prediction markets on Monday, according to the OIRA website. The measure, currently under White House review, could set clear standards for the emerging market, which has exploded in popularity over the past year, but has also faced strong scrutiny in several US states.

On Tuesday, the CFTC chief pledged to establish “very clear standards as to what can be self-certified in our markets and what cannot and how to evaluate the different products that are offered in the space.”

Speaking at the Milken Institute’s Future of Finance conference, Selig noted that, as seen with the crypto industry, the more regulators try to block these markets, the more they move offshore.

“So my view on this stuff is that we’ve got to set the right rules and regulations for it here in the United States, or otherwise, we’re just going to have black markets offshore,” the regulator affirmed.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $72,673 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat two US agencies have submitted rule proposals to the White House for the crypto industry and prediction markets?

AThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QWhat is the name of the White House office that is reviewing the crypto regulatory measures?

AThe White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).

QAccording to the article, what did the SEC submit a measure regarding?

AThe 'Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets.'

QWhat is the name of the joint initiative through which the CFTC and SEC are collaborating on crypto oversight?

AProject Crypto.

QWhat did CFTC Chairman Michael Selig argue happens when regulators try to block markets like crypto and prediction markets?

AHe argued that the more regulators try to block these markets, the more they move offshore, creating black markets offshore.

İlgili Okumalar

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit14 dk önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit14 dk önce

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

HOUSE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHousecoin (HOUSE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Housecoin (HOUSE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

261 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.04.27Güncellenme 2025.04.27

HOUSE Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların HOUSE (HOUSE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片