US Senate reminds of unresolved conflict of interest of Trump in crypto

cryptonews.ru2026-08-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A US senator has highlighted an unresolved conflict of interest concerning former President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency dealings as a remaining obstacle to passing the key market bill, the CLARITY Act. Senator Ruben Gallego, a key negotiator, stated that multiple ethics provision proposals were sent to Trump without effective response. At a White House event on August 19th, Trump urged Congress to pass the bill, after which Bitcoin's price rose to $70,000. Concerns center on Trump's expanding crypto interests, including the TRUMP memecoin and his family's World Liberty Financial project, with reports showing nearly $1.5 billion in crypto earnings. Although Trump agreed in July to a ban on federal officials issuing or funding crypto assets, Democrats criticized its enforcement mechanism. A key procedural Senate vote is scheduled for September 15th, requiring 60 votes. Gallego stated that passing "smart ethics legislation" and resolving issues like stablecoin yield regulation and anti-illegal activity measures are necessary for the bill's advancement.

The US Senate has reminded that one of the obstacles to the adoption of the key local crypto market bill, the CLARITY Act, remains the conflict of interest of US President Donald Trump concerning his crypto business. Senator Democrat Ruben Gallego, a key participant in the negotiations on the bill, pointed out that several versions of the ethics provision have been sent to Trump, but to no avail, reports The Block.

"We sent proposals to the White House again and again, but we either received no response or a response after a long delay," said Gallego.

On Wednesday, August 19, at an event at the White House, where heads of departments and large crypto companies were invited, Trump stated that Congress needs to "take the next step" by approving the CLARITY Act, which has been postponed until autumn. Against the background of his statements, the Bitcoin rate rose to $70 thousand, updating the maximum since the beginning of summer.

The expansion of Trump's business interests in the crypto industry and the growth of income from them raise concerns among some congressmen. The focus has been on the meme coin Trump Official Trump (TRUMP) and the crypto project of his family, World Liberty Financial. According to financial statements published in June, Trump earned almost $1.5 billion from crypto.

In July, Trump agreed to a ban for civil servants on issuing and financing crypto assets. The text of the provision states that its enforcement will be carried out by the Department of Justice, and the provision itself will be in effect until 2029.

This formulation drew criticism from Democrats who said it was insufficient. The latest version suggests that these rules will be enforced by state attorneys general.

A preliminary procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the Senate is scheduled for September 15. To pass this procedure, the bill needs to receive 60 votes.

According to Gallego, for this to happen, "it is necessary to adopt competent legislation in the field of ethics, as well as resolve some unresolved issues." Among them are the regulation of stablecoin yields and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illegal activities.

"There are certain political forces that would prefer not to let this issue become a political problem both from the left and from the right. There are also those who want to govern the country, want to 'land this plane' and continue to implement innovations in the world," said Gallego.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main obstacle mentioned in the article regarding the passage of the CLARITY Act?

AThe main obstacle is the unresolved conflict of interest concerning US President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency business. Senator Ruben Gallego noted that several ethics provision proposals were sent to the White House but were either ignored or met with significant delays.

QAccording to the article, what was the market reaction to Trump's statements at the White House event on August 19?

AFollowing Trump's statements at the White House event urging Congress to approve the CLARITY Act, the price of Bitcoin rose to $70,000, reaching its highest level since the beginning of the summer.

QWhich specific Trump-related crypto assets have drawn the attention and concern of some members of Congress?

AThe crypto assets that have drawn concern are the Trump memecoin called Official Trump (TRUMP) and the Trump family's crypto project, World Liberty Financial. A financial report in June indicated Trump earned nearly $1.5 billion from crypto.

QWhat changes does the latest version of the ethics provision propose regarding enforcement, and why is this criticized?

AThe latest version of the ethics provision proposes that enforcement of the rules would be handled by state attorneys general. Democrats have criticized previous versions as insufficient, particularly a July agreement where enforcement was assigned to the Department of Justice.

QWhat are the two unresolved issues mentioned by Senator Gallego that need to be addressed for the CLARITY Act to pass the procedural vote?

ASenator Gallego stated that two unresolved issues are the regulation of stablecoin yield and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illicit activity. He also emphasized the need for sound ethics legislation.

İlgili Okumalar

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

Jameson Lopp's analysis concludes that BIP-110, a proposal to restrict arbitrary data (like inscriptions) on Bitcoin, failed due to economic and technical realities, not moral arguments. The proposal, championed by Luke Dashjr and others, aimed to "cleanse" the chain but never reached its 55% miner activation threshold. Upon its forced signaling deadline in August, only the OCEAN pool (with ~1% hash rate) supported it, creating a short-lived fork that quickly died as miners faced unredeemable block rewards. Lopp's earlier predictions about its economic infeasibility were proven correct. Technically, BIP-110 was flawed; workarounds to embed data compliant with its rules were demonstrated almost immediately, proving it couldn't achieve its stated goal. The debate often devolved into moralistic rhetoric, with supporters accusing opponents of supporting child exploitation material—a tactic Lopp criticizes as ineffective for building consensus. Lopp argues Bitcoin is driven by incentives and game theory, not morality. Past forks like Bitcoin Cash promised economic benefits, while BIP-110 offered only restrictions and reduced miner fees, gaining no substantial support from major economic players. He predicts the "puritans" behind the failed fork will continue complaining but their new chain will remain insignificant. The episode reaffirms that attempting to censor data on a permissionless, anti-censorship network like Bitcoin is a futile battle.

marsbit30 dk önce

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

marsbit30 dk önce

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit33 dk önce

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit33 dk önce

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit35 dk önce

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit35 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片