U.S. Scam Center Strike Force seizes $580m in crypto in just three months

ambcrypto2026-02-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

U.S. authorities, through the Scam Center Strike Force, have seized over $580 million in cryptocurrency in under three months. This multi-agency initiative targets large-scale crypto fraud and "pig-butchering" scams linked to Chinese criminal groups in Southeast Asia. The operation reflects an aggressive shift toward intercepting illicit funds before they are laundered. Officials estimate such scams cost Americans nearly $10 billion annually. The U.S. government's crypto holdings, largely in Bitcoin, now exceed $21.5 billion. A key goal is returning seized funds to victims, signaling that improved blockchain transparency and inter-agency coordination are making crypto less viable for fraud.

U.S. authorities have frozen and seized more than $580 million in cryptocurrency in under three months.

It marks one of the most aggressive enforcement actions yet against crypto-enabled fraud networks, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

The Scam Center Strike Force carried out the seizures. It is a multi-agency initiative launched in late 2025 to target large-scale cryptocurrency investment fraud and confidence scams linked to Chinese transnational criminal organizations operating across Southeast Asia.

Prosecutors say the funds were stolen from U.S. victims through schemes commonly known as “pig-butchering,” where scammers build long-term trust before directing victims to fake crypto platforms.

A rapid escalation in crypto enforcement

Announcing the milestone, Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, said the pace of seizures underscores how aggressively federal agencies are now moving to intercept illicit crypto flows before they are fully laundered or dispersed.

Officials estimate that crypto-related scams siphon nearly $10 billion a year from Americans. This is often via social media, messaging apps, and spoofed investment portals.

In many cases, victims are persuaded to transfer legitimate crypto assets, only to see them routed into wallets controlled by criminal networks.

The Strike Force brings together prosecutors and investigators from the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, the FBI, the U.S. Secret Service, and the IRS Criminal Investigation unit, among others.

Also, authorities say their focus extends beyond wallet seizures. They identify organizers, infrastructure providers, and on-the-ground operators tied to scam compounds in Burma, Cambodia, and Laos.

What the U.S. government now holds

Arkham data show that the U.S. government has already accumulated a sizable on-chain crypto portfolio through enforcement actions. Data indicates that Bitcoin dominates U.S. government crypto holdings, accounting for over $21.5 billion.

While officials stress that seized assets remain subject to forfeiture proceedings, prosecutors say returning recovered funds to victims “to the maximum extent possible” is a core objective of the program.

A signal to crypto markets

The Strike Force’s early results suggest that large-scale crypto fraud is moving away from reactive policing toward sustained, centralized enforcement.


Final Summary

  • The $580 million seizure milestone highlights how quickly U.S. authorities are scaling crypto-focused enforcement.
  • As blockchain transparency improves and inter-agency coordination tightens, crypto is becoming less of a hiding place for scammers.

İlgili Sorular

QHow much cryptocurrency was seized by the U.S. Scam Center Strike Force in three months?

AMore than $580 million in cryptocurrency was seized.

QWhat is the primary type of scam targeted by the Scam Center Strike Force?

AThe force targets 'pig-butchering' scams, where scammers build long-term trust before directing victims to fake crypto platforms.

QWhich U.S. government office announced this enforcement milestone?

AThe U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia announced the milestone.

QWhat is the estimated annual amount Americans lose to crypto-related scams according to officials?

AOfficials estimate that crypto-related scams siphon nearly $10 billion a year from Americans.

QWhich cryptocurrency dominates the U.S. government's on-chain portfolio from enforcement actions?

ABitcoin dominates the U.S. government's crypto holdings, accounting for over $21.5 billion.

İlgili Okumalar

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit2 dk önce

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit2 dk önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 saat önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片