US prosecutors request new trial for Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

U.S. prosecutors are seeking a retrial for Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm on charges of money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations after a previous jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on those counts. Although Storm was convicted of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, the unresolved charges allow for a new trial. Prosecutors proposed a retrial as early as October, while Storm’s defense suggested availability no sooner than 2026. The case is closely watched in the crypto industry, as it could set a precedent for the legal liability of developers working on decentralized financial software and open-source protocols.

U.S. prosecutors are seeking a retrial for Roman Storm, the co-founder of the cryptocurrency mixing service Tornado Cash. This comes after a federal jury issued a mixed verdict in the previous trial. The case has received considerable attention in the cryptocurrency industry because it has the potential to set the stage for the legal accountability of decentralized software developers. Prosecutors in Manhattan are seeking a retrial for Roman Storm on two counts after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict in the previous trial.

The Letter For The Retrial

Jay Clayton wrote to Katherine Polk Failla on Monday and asked her to arrange for a retrial of Roman Storm on charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions. The government suggested the period between Oct. 5 and Oct. 12 for the trial, indicating that it could take around three weeks for the process to end. The letter indicated that the government was ready to retry the case as early as between March and May. However, Storm’s defense attorneys indicated to the prosecutors that they could only participate in the process as late as 2026.

During the earlier trial, the jurors found Storm guilty of conspiring to run an unlicensed money transmitting business in association with the crypto mixer known as Tornado Cash. However, the jury did not arrive at a unanimous decision regarding the money laundering charge and sanctions conspiracy charge, which means that these charges are eligible for retrial. Storm continues to stand by his plea of not guilty and had previously moved to dismiss the money transmitting charge. His legal representatives had argued that the prosecution failed to prove that he intended to help illicit actors use his platform. Clayton’s letter also stated that Storm’s legal representatives argued it was premature to seek a retrial until the court resolves the motion to dismiss, scheduled for argument in early April.

Tornado Cash is now a closely watched legal case in the cryptocurrency and decentralized finance spaces. This is because the outcome is thought to have implications for the interpretation of the liability of developers in decentralized software systems. It has been observed that the prosecutors used federal money transmitter laws as the basis for the prosecution of the developer of the Tornado Cash protocol. The jury has since convicted Storm of running an unlicensed money transmitting business.

Meanwhile, the jurors were unable to make a decision on the money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violation charges against Tornado Cash. These unresolved charges give the prosecution the option of holding a retrial for the unresolved charges against Tornado Cash. Legal experts say that a retrial could help determine the extent of liability for developers of open-source financial technologies. Other analysts have cautioned that expansive interpretations of current financial laws could confuse the development of decentralized finance products. Pro-privacy groups have highlighted Tornado Cash’s role as an open-source privacy protocol on blockchain networks.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Trump Signals Iran War May End Very Soon, Floats U.S. Control of the Strait of Hormuz

TagsBlockchainTornado CashU.S

İlgili Sorular

QWhat specific charges is the US government seeking a retrial for against Roman Storm?

AThe US government is seeking a retrial for Roman Storm on the charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions.

QWhy did the jury's previous verdict lead to the possibility of a retrial?

AThe jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on the money laundering and sanctions conspiracy charges, making those specific charges eligible for a retrial.

QWhat was the one charge that the jury did convict Roman Storm on in the initial trial?

AThe jury convicted Roman Storm of conspiring to run an unlicensed money transmitting business.

QWhy is the Tornado Cash case considered so significant for the cryptocurrency industry?

AThe case is significant because its outcome could set a legal precedent for determining the liability of developers who create decentralized software and open-source financial technologies.

QWhat argument did Storm's defense team use to challenge the money laundering charge?

AStorm's defense attorneys argued that the prosecution failed to prove he had the intent to help illicit actors use the Tornado Cash platform.

İlgili Okumalar

The United States Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

The White House has published a page titled "Lab Leak: The True Origin of Covid-19," presenting the laboratory leak from a Wuhan facility as the most likely cause of the pandemic. This conclusion is based on a report by a US House of Representatives subcommittee investigating the virus's origins. Key arguments cited include the virus's unique biological features not found in nature, a single suspected spillover event into humans, and the proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which conducted gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. The report also notes that WIV staff exhibited COVID-like symptoms in autumn 2019, prior to the official outbreak. It criticizes a prominent paper on the virus's natural origin, alleging it was promoted by Dr. Anthony Fauci. The congressional subcommittee's report led to the suspension and subsequent five-year debarment of the EcoHealth Alliance and its president, Peter Daszak, from US federal funding, following findings of grant violations related to the Wuhan research. A Department of Justice grand jury is also investigating. While this US government position is presented, the scientific community, including WHO working groups, continues to debate both natural zoonotic and laboratory origins. The investigation underscores the pandemic's immense human (nearly 15 million deaths per WHO) and economic toll (over $4 trillion), highlighting the geopolitical weight of assigning blame and the future need for robust global biosecurity protocols.

cryptonews.ru6 dk önce

The United States Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

cryptonews.ru6 dk önce

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, the Place to Lose Money is Called the Stock Market. The article depicts a future (2026) where global stock markets, particularly tech stocks, are exhibiting behaviors and risks reminiscent of the cryptocurrency world. The narrative centers on a sharp crash in South Korea's KOSPI index and leading stocks like SK Hynix, highlighting widespread retail losses, leverage-induced liquidations, and extreme volatility. It argues that a significant shift in market dynamics is underway: pricing is increasingly driven by narratives (like the AI boom) over fundamental valuation, amplified by high leverage and the rapid, emotion-fueled consensus formed on social media. Former crypto traders, seeking new opportunities, brought their high-risk strategies—chasing narratives, using leverage—into equity markets, focusing on sectors like AI and semiconductors. Ironically, data suggests some major tech stocks have recently shown greater volatility and faster crashes than Bitcoin, which is becoming relatively more stable and "stock-like" through institutional adoption. The piece details how leveraged ETFs in Korea, particularly those tied to single stocks, created a vicious cycle of forced selling that exacerbated the market plunge. It concludes that while stocks retain underlying fundamentals, the *trading* of them has undergone a "de-rationalization": markets now prioritize themes, social media sentiment, and leveraged bets over traditional analysis. In a paradoxical twist, Bitcoin is striving to become more like a traditional asset, while a segment of the stock market is becoming more like crypto—a cycle of grand stories, crowded trades, easy leverage, and the pervasive, often misplaced, belief that one can exit before everyone else. The final, poignant wish from a Korean retail investor—to go back to life before trading and get their money back—underscores that markets offer no refunds.

marsbit24 dk önce

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

marsbit24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片