US prosecutors propose changes to CLARITY as voting window narrows: Report

cointelegraph2026-07-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

US law enforcement organizations have proposed changes to the cryptocurrency market structure bill known as the CLARITY Act, as the Senate's window to vote narrows before a month-long recess. The groups requested alterations to provisions regarding developer liability within the bill. The White House crypto adviser indicated the proposals do not align with the administration's position. The legislation faces pushback from some Democrats over ethics rules related to former President Trump's crypto investments. Senate leaders have not scheduled a vote, and procedural hurdles make passage before the recess unlikely. A key aspect of the bill would shift primary regulatory authority over digital assets from the SEC to the CFTC.

Organizations representing law enforcement officials in the US have reportedly proposed changes to a comprehensive cryptocurrency market structure bill under consideration in the Senate, with only days left until the chamber breaks for a month-long recess.

According to a Tuesday Politico report, the National Association of Assistant US Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association sent a letter to the White House asking for changes on provisions regarding developers in the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. The changes proposed to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) within the CLARITY Act included that guidelines on developers not “create, expand, or modify criminal liability under Federal law.”

In response to reports on the proposed changes, White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt said that the provisions were “not even close” to the Trump administration’s position, and implied that it was not the result of “productive negotiations.” Senator Catherine Cortez Masto has reportedly been pushing the White House to address the BRCA before any potential vote.

The provisions came as the CLARITY Act faces pushback from many Democrats over ethics rules in the bill regarding US President Donald Trump’s crypto investments, which netted him $1.4 billion in 2025. As of Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune had not scheduled a vote on the legislation before the chamber breaks for state work periods.

Related: Wyden urges Senate leaders to keep dev protections in crypto bill

The US Senate is scheduled to start state work periods from Aug. 7 to Sept. 14, giving lawmakers a limited window to pass crypto market structure before the recess and potential complications from the 2026 midterm elections in November. Thune told reporters last week that the Senate was unlikely to vote on the bill before the August recess.

”Even if CLARITY were brought up today, the procedural steps — cloture → amendment process → second cloture → up to 30 hours of debate — make finishing before recess extremely difficult without [unanimous consent] agreement to waive process, which is rare on contested bills,” said Anne Kelley, a partner at consulting firm Mercury Strategies, in a Monday X post.

CLARITY could shift crypto authority to US commodities regulator

One of the key points of the crypto market structure bill would be to change the regulatory purview over digital asset largely from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which currently has fewer tools and resources to address enforcement and oversight issues. Both agencies are also currently understaffed at the leadership level, with only one CFTC chair and three SEC commissioners.

Magazine: Here’s why the CLARITY Act’s ethics deal may be so hard to reach

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main concern expressed by US prosecutors regarding the CLARITY Act, according to the article?

AThe main concern expressed by US prosecutors is about provisions regarding developers in the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. Specifically, they proposed changes to ensure that guidelines on developers do not 'create, expand, or modify criminal liability under Federal law.'

QWhat is the stated position of White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt on the proposed changes to the CLARITY Act?

AWhite House crypto adviser Patrick Witt stated that the proposed provisions were 'not even close' to the Trump administration's position and implied they were not the result of 'productive negotiations.'

QWhy does the article state there is a limited window to pass the crypto market structure bill in the Senate?

AThere is a limited window because the US Senate is scheduled to start state work periods from August 7 to September 14. Furthermore, the 2026 midterm elections in November could introduce potential complications, pressuring lawmakers to act before the recess.

QWhat is one of the key regulatory changes proposed by the CLARITY Act regarding oversight of digital assets?

AOne key regulatory change proposed by the CLARITY Act is to shift the primary regulatory authority over digital assets from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QAccording to Anne Kelley, why would it be extremely difficult to pass the CLARITY Act before the Senate recess even if it were brought up immediately?

AAccording to Anne Kelley, even if the CLARITY Act were brought up immediately, the required procedural steps—including cloture votes, an amendment process, and up to 30 hours of debate—would make finishing before the recess extremely difficult without a rare unanimous consent agreement to waive the normal process.

İlgili Okumalar

After the Fed's Interest Rate Decision and Comments from Kevin Walsh, Experts Gathered and Shared Their Latest Insights!

Following the Fed's decision to hold interest rates steady, experts highlight a potential shift towards more independent policymaking within the FOMC, as three members dissented. Market strategists note the slight decline in bond yields and a weaker dollar post-announcement, but caution that a rate hike in September remains possible. Experts like Mark Hackett point to the three dissenting votes as a sign of growing committee independence. While markets initially rallied in relief, the final direction hinges on Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's upcoming press conference. Analysts, including Audrey Childs-Freeman, interpret the dissent as the Fed maintaining a hawkish stance. They suggest the Fed will continue monitoring data, with a summer scenario of high bond yields supporting the dollar still in play. Chris Anstey emphasizes that markets will closely watch the 10-year Treasury yield during Warsh's conference. A continued rise could signal investor fears that the Fed is not acting aggressively enough on inflation, posing a challenge for the Chair. The long-term yield is also viewed as critical for mortgages and economic management. Diane Swonk of KPMG argues a September rate hike is likely, stating that an increase now would have been more appropriate given nearly five years of high inflation. She warns that prolonged high prices risk becoming embedded in the economic system. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

After the Fed's Interest Rate Decision and Comments from Kevin Walsh, Experts Gathered and Shared Their Latest Insights!

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片