US Market Structure Bill Delayed and Deferred Again — Is a 2026 Passage Possible?

ccn.com2026-01-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The US crypto market structure bill, which aims to provide regulatory clarity, has faced another delay in the Senate as of January 2026. Key factors include Coinbase withdrawing support, citing concerns over stablecoin yield bans and expanded SEC authority. Competing legislative priorities, partisan disagreements, and the upcoming midterm elections further complicate its passage. A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee may advance, but the overall timeline remains uncertain. While 2026 passage is still possible, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

Key Takeaways

  • Senate consideration of the crypto market structure bill stalled again in January 2026 after Coinbase withdrew its support.
  • A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee could move forward soon, with a potential hearing as early as Jan. 27.
  • Passage in 2026 remains possible, but midterm elections and unresolved regulatory disputes make the outcome increasingly uncertain.

Crypto’s long-awaited path to regulatory clarity in the U.S. just hit another roadblock .

After months of negotiations, industry lobbying, and bipartisan signaling, momentum around Washington’s flagship crypto market structure bill is once again slowing.

Behind the scenes, shifting political priorities, growing industry pushback, and committee-level maneuvering are reshaping the bill’s timeline—raising fresh questions about whether 2026 will finally deliver the rules the crypto sector has been waiting for.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

Another Delay?

The U.S. crypto market structure bill cleared the House in mid-2025, but momentum has repeatedly stalled in the Senate.

Lawmakers released an updated draft earlier this month and scheduled a new meeting for Jan. 27, raising hopes of progress after weeks of uncertainty.

Those hopes remain fragile. Industry pushback, partisan negotiations, and shifting legislative priorities have repeatedly delayed the bill.

As of January 2026, Senate markups have been postponed again, with consideration now likely pushed to late February or March.

Competing priorities—particularly housing affordability legislation tied to President Trump’s agenda—have taken precedence.

A floor vote may not occur until after the Jan. 30 deadline for a stopgap government funding bill, further complicating the timeline.

The bill also faces structural hurdles. It requires approval from multiple committees, and negotiations between Republicans and Democrats remain tense.

Republicans have pushed for lighter oversight under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Democrats have emphasized stronger consumer protections.

Lawmakers such as Sen. Debbie Stabenow have raised concerns over provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities, and the draft has ballooned to more than 100 amendments—an indicator of how far consensus remains.

Reasons For Delay

Several factors have contributed to the latest setbacks.

Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange, withdrew its support for the Senate draft on Jan. 15, 2026, citing “too many issues,” including proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority over crypto markets.

CEO Brian Armstrong called the draft “materially worse than the status quo.”

The move dealt a major blow to the bill, as Coinbase’s support was seen as critical to maintaining industry consensus.

With midterm elections approaching in November 2026, lawmakers are increasingly prioritizing voter-focused issues such as housing affordability.

Funding measures and other Trump-backed initiatives are taking precedence, potentially pushing crypto legislation further down the agenda.

Political polarization and the bill’s complexity have also fueled concerns that partisan point-scoring could derail progress.

A shift in Senate control during the midterms could further jeopardize the bill’s chances.

In the meantime, the SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential “exemptive relief” that could ease certain regulatory burdens without new legislation.

While this may reduce near-term pressure to pass the bill, it falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry has been seeking.

Overall, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance of passage in 2026, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority in the coming months.

2026 CLARITY Act Still Possible?

Despite the delays, passage in 2026 is still possible. If markups resume in late February and key disputes are resolved, the bill could advance.

However, the approaching November midterm elections add political risk, as shifting control of Congress could derail the effort entirely.

In the meantime, regulators may attempt to fill the gap.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins has signaled a significant easing of enforcement pressure through rulemaking and exemptive relief, offering some short-term breathing room for the industry even as comprehensive legislation remains stalled.

At its core, the market structure bill aims to clarify the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC, define when crypto tokens qualify as securities or commodities, and establish clearer rules around stablecoins, DeFi, and consumer protections.

Whether those goals can survive the current political logjam will shape the U.S. crypto landscape for years to come.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

İlgili Sorular

QWhy was the US crypto market structure bill delayed again in January 2026?

AThe bill was delayed due to Coinbase withdrawing its support, shifting political priorities such as housing affordability legislation, partisan negotiations, and the complexity of the bill with over 100 amendments.

QWhat are the key differences between the Republican and Democratic positions on the crypto market structure bill?

ARepublicans push for lighter oversight under the CFTC, while Democrats emphasize stronger consumer protections and have raised concerns about provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities.

QWhat impact did Coinbase's withdrawal of support have on the bill?

ACoinbase's withdrawal dealt a major blow to the bill, as its support was critical for maintaining industry consensus, citing issues like proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority.

QIs passage of the crypto market structure bill still possible in 2026, and what are the chances?

APassage in 2026 is still possible with an estimated 50-60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority, but midterm elections add political risk.

QHow are regulators like the SEC and CFTC addressing crypto regulation in the absence of the bill?

AThe SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential 'exemptive relief' to ease certain regulatory burdens, though this falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry seeks.

İlgili Okumalar

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit7 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit7 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片