U.S. government confirms it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet

ambcrypto2026-01-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The U.S. government has not sold the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet, according to a confirmation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The statement refutes earlier claims that the assets were liquidated, which would have violated Executive Order 14233 requiring forfeited Bitcoin to be retained. The DOJ clarified that the Bitcoin remains on the government’s balance sheet as part of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. On-chain data from Arkham supports this, showing no significant outflows from known U.S. government wallets. The confusion stemmed from historical precedent where seized Bitcoin was auctioned, but current policy under the executive order mandates holding such assets. The U.S. government continues to hold over 328,000 BTC, valued at more than $31 billion.

The U.S. government has confirmed that it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet. The confirmation addresses earlier claims that the assets had been liquidated in violation of federal policy governing forfeited digital assets.

U.S. DOJ clarification addresses liquidation claims

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said the Department of Justice [DOJ] has confirmed that the seized Bitcoin “have not been liquidated and will not be liquidated”.

He added that the assets will remain on the U.S. government’s balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The clarification follows reports earlier this month suggesting that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York [SDNY] had sold Bitcoin forfeited by developers associated with Samourai Wallet.

The alleged sale potentially contradicts Executive Order 14233, which mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

According to Witt, the DOJ confirmed that the forfeited digital assets remain in the U.S. government’s possession and comply with the executive order. The statement directly counters claims that the Bitcoin had already been liquidated following the Samourai plea agreement.

The DOJ has not publicly detailed operational handling of the assets beyond confirming they remain on the government’s balance sheet.

However, the confirmation removes uncertainty around whether the seizure resulted in market sales or contributed to recent Bitcoin price movements.

On-chain data aligns with U.S. government statement

Independent blockchain data from Arkham supports the U.S. DOJ’s position. Publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings show no material reduction in Bitcoin balances consistent with a sale linked to the Samourai case.

As of mid-January, on-chain analytics indicate the U.S. government continues to hold more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion, alongside smaller balances of ether and stablecoins. No abnormal outflows tied to the Samourai forfeiture have been observed.

Why the confusion emerged

Historically, the U.S. government has sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, particularly in earlier cases such as Silk Road.

That precedent shaped market expectations and led to the assumption that newly forfeited Bitcoin would also be liquidated.

However, Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift, requiring certain seized Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset rather than sold.

The Samourai case appears to fall under this updated framework, marking a departure from earlier forfeiture practices.

For now, the DOJ’s confirmation closes the question of whether Samourai-related Bitcoin entered the market.


Final Thoughts

  • The DOJ’s confirmation resolves claims that Samourai Wallet–related Bitcoin had been liquidated, reinforcing that the assets remain held under current federal policy.
  • The episode highlights how legacy expectations around seized Bitcoin sales continue to clash with the U.S. government’s evolving approach.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did the U.S. government confirm regarding the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet?

AThe U.S. government confirmed that it did not sell the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet and that the assets will remain on the government's balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

QWhich executive order mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold?

AExecutive Order 14233 mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

QHow much Bitcoin does the U.S. government currently hold according to on-chain analytics as of mid-January?

AAs of mid-January, the U.S. government holds more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion.

QWhy did confusion emerge about the liquidation of the seized Bitcoin from Samourai Wallet?

AConfusion emerged because historically the U.S. government sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, which shaped market expectations, but Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift requiring certain Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset.

QWhat role did on-chain data from Arkham play in this situation?

AIndependent blockchain data from Arkham supported the U.S. DOJ's position by showing no material reduction in Bitcoin balances in publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings, consistent with no sale linked to the Samourai case.

İlgili Okumalar

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit35 dk önce

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit35 dk önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片