Uniswap (UNI) Volume Soars 500%, Will the Recent Spike Turn Into a Breakout?

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Despite a generally bearish crypto market, Uniswap (UNI) experienced a significant surge, with its price gaining 5.23% and trading volume soaring over 568% to $1.05 billion. After opening at $3.23, the price climbed to a high of $4.37 before settling at $3.39. However, technical indicators suggest a potential bearish correction. The MACD and signal lines are below zero, indicating a negative trend, and the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) at -0.24 shows strong selling pressure. The RSI at 48.19 is neutral, while the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. Key support is at $3.31, with resistance at $3.47.

With a 0.45% spike in the market, some of the crypto assets are charted in green. The bearish dominance has erased all the recent gains, keeping the broader sentiment in extreme fear. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), trades around $66.9K, while Ethereum (ETH), the largest altcoin, hovers at $1.9K. Among other altcoins, Uniswap (UNI) lit green on the chart with a 5.23% gain.

The asset opened the day trading at a bottom level of $3.23, and the entry of bulls was lightning-fast, resulting in the UNI price climbing to a high range of $4.37. According to CMC data, at press time, Uniswap traded at $3.39, with its market cap resting at $2.12 billion. Notably, the daily trading volume has increased by over 568% touched the $1.05 billion zone.

Uniswap’s 4-hour trading pattern reveals the negative outlook, and the price could slip to the key support at around $3.31. Assuming the downside correction intensifies, the asset’s price may steadily fall toward $3.23 or even lower. On the flip side, if the UNI bulls reclaimed power against the pressure, the price movement might rise to a retest of the $3.47 resistance. As the token continues to move upward, it will climb high toward the $3.55 range.

Uniswap Faces Bearish Correction on the Charts

When both the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and the signal lines of Uniswap are below the zero line, displaying its bearish mood. As the downward momentum dominates, the broader trend is negative. Only a bullish move above zero can rescue the asset.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is located at -0.24, pointing to a strong selling pressure in the UNI market. There is a significant amount of capital outflows, and if the negative reading persists, it likely supports the downside momentum to continue.

Uniswap’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) is found at 48.19 suggests neutral momentum. It is neither overbought nor oversold, hovering near the midpoint of 50, and a move above it hints at strengthening bullish pressure, while a drop below 40 may signal growing weakness.

Furthermore, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. With the negative value, the sellers have a marginal edge. Also, as the magnitude is very small, the ongoing market momentum of UNI is weak rather than strongly bearish.

Top Updated Crypto News

73% Price Jump and 404% Volume Boom: Can Berachain (BERA) Power Higher?

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the percentage increase in Uniswap's (UNI) daily trading volume mentioned in the article?

AThe daily trading volume of Uniswap (UNI) increased by over 568%.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the key support level for UNI's price?

AThe key support level for UNI's price is around $3.31.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value of -0.24 indicate about the UNI market?

AA CMF value of -0.24 indicates strong selling pressure and significant capital outflows in the UNI market.

QWhat is the significance of the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading of 48.19 for Uniswap?

AAn RSI reading of 48.19 suggests a neutral momentum, meaning the asset is neither overbought nor oversold.

QWhat condition would 'rescue' the asset from its bearish trend according to the MACD analysis?

AA bullish move above the zero line by the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) could rescue the asset from its bearish trend.

İlgili Okumalar

Who Will Take Over After SpaceX's IPO?

SpaceX is set to go public on June 12 with a $1.8 trillion valuation, but only about 5.56 billion shares (4.2% of the total) will be initially available for trading. Buy-side pressure is expected in three distinct waves. First, the IPO subscription at a fixed $135 per share, which is oversubscribed by nearly 4 times. Second, immediate secondary market trading post-listing. Third, and most significant, the forced buying by passive index funds. The Nasdaq 100 index has modified its rules to include SpaceX just 15 trading days after its IPO, despite its small float, which will compel hundreds of tracking funds to buy large quantities of stock. However, this initial supply shortage will not last. A staged lock-up release is designed for the approximately 54% of shares held by VCs, early employees, and other insiders (excluding Elon Musk's 42%, which is locked for 366 days). Releases begin after the Q2 earnings report, with subsequent unlocks at multiple intervals up to 180 days post-IPO. This means selling pressure from insiders will gradually increase throughout the latter half of the year. A key counterbalance is scheduled for mid-December during the Nasdaq 100's annual rebalancing. By then, the public float will have expanded significantly, forcing index funds to buy more shares, potentially providing institutional support after months of insider selling.

marsbit24 dk önce

marsbit24 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit43 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit43 dk önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 saat önce

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 saat önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1 saat önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinist1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures