UK tests stablecoins in regulatory sandbox while proposing limits on user holdings

ambcrypto2026-02-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

UK regulators are advancing a dual approach to stablecoin regulation, combining live testing within the Financial Conduct Authority’s sandbox with proposed limits on user holdings. The sandbox includes firms like Revolut and Monee Financial Technologies, trialing applications in payments, settlement, and crypto trading under strict supervision. Concurrently, the Bank of England has proposed temporary caps—£20,000 per stablecoin for individuals and £10 million for businesses—to mitigate systemic risks such as bank deposit flight. This cautious "test and contain" strategy aims to foster innovation in pound-denominated stablecoins while preventing rapid scaling until the market matures. The UK’s approach reflects the minor global role of non-dollar stablecoins and focuses on ensuring safe integration into the existing financial system.

UK regulators have begun live testing of stablecoin use cases under a controlled sandbox programme. This comes even as policymakers move to impose limits on the amount of stablecoin users can hold domestically.

The parallel initiatives underscore a cautious regulatory approach: encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while putting guardrails in place to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

FCA sandbox moves stablecoin testing into live trials

The testing is taking place under a sandbox run by the Financial Conduct Authority, which allows firms to trial new financial products under regulatory supervision.

The sandbox includes a small group of participants assessing potential applications such as payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading. Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX would be part of the testing.

Work is expected to begin this quarter, with testing conducted in tightly controlled conditions rather than through public rollouts.

Notably, the trials do not include major high-street banks, reflecting the continued caution among large UK lenders toward issuing or distributing stablecoins.

Proposed holding caps signal prudence

Running alongside the sandbox is a separate proposal from the Bank of England to cap the amount of stablecoins that UK users can hold, at least during the early phase of adoption.

Under the proposal, individuals would face limits on holdings of a given systemic stablecoin. At the same time, businesses would be subject to higher thresholds.

Individuals will be allowed up to about £20,000 per coin, while companies will be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

The measures are intended as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress.

The caps would apply only to stablecoins deemed systemic and are designed to be revisited as the market matures.

UK takes a “test and contain” approach

Taken together, the sandbox and holding-limit proposals reflect a regulatory strategy that prioritises learning and containment over rapid scale.

While regulators acknowledge that stablecoins could improve efficiency in areas like payments and settlement, they remain wary of their potential to blur the line between bank deposits and crypto-based instruments.

The Bank of England has previously encouraged banks to focus on tokenised deposits rather than issuing stablecoins directly.

Pound stablecoins remain marginal globally

The UK’s measured stance also reflects the limited global footprint of non-dollar stablecoins.

Industry data shows that pound- and euro-denominated stablecoins account for a fraction of global circulation, with dollar-pegged tokens continuing to dominate volumes.

Against that backdrop, the sandbox is less about accelerating mass adoption and more about determining whether sterling stablecoins can operate safely within the existing financial system.


Final Summary

  • The UK is allowing stablecoin testing to proceed, but only within tightly controlled regulatory boundaries.
  • Proposed holding limits suggest policymakers want to manage systemic risk before stablecoins reach meaningful scale.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the purpose of the UK's regulatory sandbox for stablecoins?

AThe purpose is to allow firms to trial new financial products, including stablecoin use cases for payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading, under the supervision of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a controlled environment.

QWhich companies are mentioned as participants in the FCA's stablecoin sandbox testing?

AThe participants mentioned are Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX.

QWhat are the proposed holding limits for stablecoins in the UK according to the Bank of England?

AIndividuals would be allowed to hold up to about £20,000 per systemic stablecoin, while companies would be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

QWhy are UK regulators proposing limits on stablecoin holdings?

AThe limits are proposed as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress, managing systemic risk before stablecoins reach a significant scale.

QWhat does the UK's regulatory approach to stablecoins prioritize, according to the article?

AThe regulatory strategy prioritizes learning and containment over rapid scale, encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while implementing guardrails to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片