TVL, Trading Volume, Open Interest: How to Use DeFi Data to Find the Next Breakout Project?

marsbit2026-01-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Analyzing DeFi projects requires moving beyond hype and narratives to focus on on-chain fundamentals—a revolutionary advantage over traditional finance due to its real-time, transparent data. Key metrics include: - **TVL (Total Value Locked)**: Reflects assets deposited in a protocol, similar to AUM in TradFi, but should be combined with USD net inflows to distinguish actual deposits from price changes. - **Fees, Revenue, and Holder Revenue**: Fees are total user payments (gross revenue), revenue is the protocol’s share (gross income), and holder revenue is what token holders earn via dividends or buybacks. - **Volume**: Tracks trading activity on DEXs and perpetual exchanges, with market share trends often more meaningful than absolute numbers. - **Open Interest**: Measures active derivative positions, indicating liquidity and platform resilience during volatility. - **Stablecoin Market Cap**: Represents real USD capital flowing into a blockchain, a key indicator of ecosystem growth. - **App Revenue & Fees**: The "GDP" of a chain, showing economic activity excluding stablecoins and gas fees. Effective analysis prioritizes sustained growth over time, combines stock metrics (e.g., TVL) with flow metrics (e.g., fees), and accounts for token unlocks and incentives that may cause sell pressure. Platforms like DefiLlama provide real-time data to identify trends early, as seen with Polymarket and Hyperliquid’s growth before they peaked. Mastering these metrics helps cut through n...

Author:Patrick Scott | Dynamo DeFi

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

In the past, the analysis of crypto assets mostly revolved around charts, hype cycles, and narratives. However, as the industry gradually matures, actual performance is more important than empty promises. You need a filter to help you distill truly valuable signals from the vast amount of information.

Fortunately, this filter already exists, and it's called Onchain Fundamentals.

Onchain fundamentals provide DeFi (Decentralized Finance) with a structural advantage over traditional finance (TradFi). This is not only one of the many reasons why "DeFi will win," but also a core concept that everyone who wants to invest in this industry must understand.

Over the past four years, I have been deeply immersed in the study of DeFi metrics, initially as a researcher and later working with the DefiLlama team. This article summarizes some of the most useful analytical frameworks I've learned during this time, hoping to help you start using these tools.

Source: https://defillama.com/?stablecoinsMcap=true&dexsVolume=true

Why are DeFi Metrics Important?

On-chain data is not just a breakthrough in evaluating crypto assets; it's a revolution in the entire field of financial data.

Think about how traditional investors evaluate companies: they have to wait for quarterly financial reports. And now, some are even proposing to change the frequency of financial reports from quarterly to semi-annually.

In contrast, the financial data of DeFi protocols is available in real-time. Websites like DefiLlama update relevant data daily or even hourly. If you want to track revenue by the minute, you can even query the blockchain data directly (although overly granular data might not be very meaningful, you do have that option).

This is undoubtedly a revolutionary breakthrough in transparency. When you buy stock in a listed company, you rely on financial data released by management after being audited by accountants, often with delays of weeks or even months. When you evaluate a DeFi protocol, you directly read the transaction records happening in real-time on an immutable ledger.

Of course, not every crypto project has fundamental data worth tracking. For example, for many "Memecoins" or "vaporware" projects with just a whitepaper and a Telegram group, fundamental analysis isn't very helpful (although other metrics like the number of holders might provide some reference).

But for those protocols that can generate fees, accumulate deposits, and distribute value to token holders, their operations leave a data trail that can be tracked and analyzed, often before market narratives form.

For instance, Polymarket's liquidity has been growing for years, a trend that started long before prediction markets became a hot topic.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/polymarket

The explosive price growth of the HYPE token last summer stemmed from its consistently high revenue performance.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/hyperliquid?tvl=false&revenue=true&fees=false&groupBy=monthly

These metrics had long hinted at the future direction; you just needed to know where to look.

Core Metrics Explained

Let's start with the core metrics you need to understand for DeFi investing.

TVL (Total Value Locked)

TVL measures the total value of assets deposited into a protocol's smart contracts.

  • For lending platforms, TVL includes collateral and supplied assets.
  • For decentralized exchanges (DEXs), TVL refers to deposits in liquidity pools.
  • For blockchain networks, TVL is the total value locked across all protocols deployed on that network.

Source: https://defillama.com/

In traditional finance (TradFi), TVL is similar to Assets Under Management (AUM). Hedge funds report AUM to show the total amount of money clients have entrusted to them. TVL serves a similar purpose, reflecting the total amount of funds users have deposited into the protocol, indicating the level of trust users have in its smart contracts.

However, TVL has faced considerable criticism over the years, some of it justified.

  • TVL does not measure activity. A protocol might have billions of dollars in TVL but generate almost no fees.
  • TVL is highly correlated with token price. If the price of ETH drops 30%, the TVL of all protocols holding ETH will drop proportionally, even if no actual withdrawals occur.

Since most DeFi deposits are in volatile tokens, TVL is susceptible to price fluctuations. Therefore, savvy observers combine USD Net Inflows with TVL to distinguish between price changes and actual deposit activity. USD Net Inflows are calculated by taking the change in the balance of each asset between two consecutive days (multiplied by the price) and summing them up. For example, a protocol 100% locked in ETH would see its TVL drop 20% if ETH price drops 20%, but its USD Net Inflows would be $0.

Nevertheless, when TVL is presented in both USD and token terms, and combined with activity or productivity metrics, it still holds value. TVL remains an important tool for measuring protocol trust and the scale of the entire DeFi ecosystem. Just don't mistake it for a complete evaluation standard.

Fees, Revenue, and Holders' Revenue

In DeFi, the definitions of these terms differ from traditional accounting and can be confusing.

  • Fees: From the user's perspective, fees are the cost you pay to use the protocol. For example, when you trade on a DEX, you pay a trading fee. This fee might go entirely to liquidity providers or partially to the protocol. Fees represent the total amount paid by users, regardless of where it ultimately goes. In traditional finance, this is equivalent to Gross Revenue.
  • Revenue: Revenue refers to the protocol's share of the earnings. That is, out of all the fees users pay, how much does the protocol actually keep? This revenue might go to the protocol's treasury, team, or token holders. Revenue excludes fees distributed to liquidity providers. Think of it as the protocol's Gross Income.
  • Holders' Revenue: This is a narrower definition, tracking only the portion of revenue distributed to token holders through buybacks, fee burns, or direct staking rewards. In traditional finance, this is similar to a combination of dividends and stock buybacks.

These distinctions are crucial for valuation. Some protocols may generate substantial fees but end up with little revenue because almost all fees are distributed to liquidity providers.

DefiLlama has now released full income statements for many protocols. These statements are automatically updated based on on-chain data, breaking down revenue into different items and redefining these metrics in standard accounting language.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/aave

These income statements also come with fund flow visualizations, showing how money flows from users into the protocol and is then distributed to various stakeholders. This information is worth exploring if you want to delve deeper into a specific project's economic model.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/aave

Volume

Volume is used to track the scale of trading activity.

  • DEX Volume: Counts all token swaps on decentralized exchanges (DEXs).
  • Perpetuals Volume (Perp Volume): Counts the total trading volume on all perpetual futures trading platforms.

Source: https://defillama.com/pro/97i44ip1zko4f8h

Volume is a key metric for measuring overall participation in the crypto market. When people are actively using digital assets, they trade. Surges in volume are often associated with shifts in market sentiment, whether it's frenzied buying during a bull run or panic selling.

Compared to previous cycles, perpetual futures volume has grown significantly. In 2021, perpetual futures exchanges were barely a presence. Today, platforms like Hyperliquid, Aster, and Lighter handle billions of dollars in daily volume. Due to the rapid growth of this sector, comparing it to historical data is of limited value. For instance, comparing current perpetual volume to 2021 data only shows that the sector has expanded, without providing much valuable insight.

Within a category, the trend in market share change is more important than absolute volume. For example, a perpetual DEX increasing its market share from 5% to 15% indicates an actual gain in market position, even if its absolute volume decreases. DefiLlama's library of custom dashboards offers many market share charts worth checking out.

Open Interest (OI)

Open Interest refers to the total value of derivative contracts that have not been closed or liquidated. For perpetual DEXs, open interest represents all open positions that haven't been closed or liquidated.

Source: https://defillama.com/open-interest

Open Interest is an important metric for measuring the liquidity of derivative platforms. It reflects the total amount of capital deployed in active perpetual positions.

During periods of market volatility, this metric can collapse quickly. A large wave of liquidations can wipe out open interest in a matter of hours. Tracking the recovery after such events can show whether a platform can regain liquidity or if the capital has permanently migrated elsewhere.

Stablecoin Market Cap

For a blockchain network, the stablecoin market cap is the total value of all stablecoins deployed on that network.

Source: https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains

Stablecoin market cap is a key metric for measuring capital inflows. Unlike TVL, which is affected by token price volatility, stablecoins represent real dollars (or dollar equivalents) that users have actually bridged onto the chain. For example, if the stablecoin market cap on a chain grows from $3 billion to $8 billion, it means $5 billion in real capital has flowed into that ecosystem.

Since October 2023, approximately $180 billion has flowed into the crypto market in the form of stablecoins. A portion of this inevitably enters DeFi, driving TVL growth, increased volume, and fee generation. Stablecoin flows are akin to capital inflows in a national economy; an increase in stablecoin supply signifies new money entering, while a decrease indicates capital outflow.

App Revenue & App Fees

App Revenue and App Fees are chain-level metrics that count the revenue and fees generated by all applications deployed on that chain, excluding stablecoins, liquid staking protocols, and Gas fees.

I consider this the "GDP" of a blockchain, showcasing the scale of actual economic activity happening within its ecosystem.

Revenue metrics are among the hardest data to fake because they require users to actually pay money. This makes them a high-signal indicator for judging the activity level of a DeFi ecosystem.

It's important to note that you cannot base valuation on app revenue, as valuing an asset based on revenue not directly linked to it is meaningless. App Revenue and App Fees are better suited for diagnosing whether a chain is growing, not for assessing its value.

How to Effectively Interpret These Metrics?

Understanding individual metrics is the first step, but to use them effectively, you need an analytical framework. I tend to use the following three-step analysis method:

  1. Prioritize sustained, stable growth.
  2. Track both stock and flow metrics simultaneously.
  3. Consider the impact of token unlocks and incentives.

1. Prioritize Sustained, Stable Growth

Protocols whose revenue charts show a brief spike followed by a rapid crash do not demonstrate sustainable value creation. I've seen countless protocols set weekly revenue records only to disappear a month later.

What truly matters is stable growth over a longer time horizon. For example, a protocol whose monthly revenue gradually grows from $500,000 to $2 million over six months indicates sustainable growth. A protocol whose revenue suddenly spikes to $5 million one week but then quickly drops to $300,000 is likely just a flash in the pan.

In the crypto industry, time passes much quicker than in traditional markets. Here, one month of sustained growth is roughly equivalent to a quarter in traditional markets. If a protocol's revenue grows consistently for six months, consider it akin to a company with six consecutive quarters of earnings growth. That kind of performance is worth paying attention to.

2. Track Both Stock and Flow Metrics Simultaneously

  • Stock Metrics: Such as TVL, Open Interest, Stablecoin Market Cap, Treasury, etc., tell you how much capital is deposited in the protocol.
  • Flow Metrics: Such as Fees, Revenue, Volume, etc., tell you the actual level of activity within the protocol.

Both are equally important.

Activity is easier to fake. For example, a protocol can artificially inflate volume through incentives or wash trading, and such temporary spikes are not uncommon. Liquidity, however, is much harder to manufacture. Getting users to actually deposit funds and keep them there long-term requires real utility or attractive yields from the protocol.

When evaluating any protocol, analyze at least one stock metric and one flow metric. For example:

  • For a perpetual DEX, choose Open Interest and Volume.
  • For a lending protocol, choose TVL and Fees.
  • For a blockchain, choose Stablecoin Market Cap and App Revenue.

If both types of metrics show growth, the protocol is genuinely expanding. If only activity metrics are growing while liquidity stagnates, dig deeper—there might be manipulation. If only liquidity is growing while activity stagnates, it might indicate deposits are coming from a few "whales."

3. Consider Token Unlocks and Incentives

Token unlocks create sell pressure. A portion of the vested tokens released weekly by a protocol will always be sold. If there is no other source of demand to offset this selling, the token price will fall.

Before investing, check the token's unlock schedule. A protocol with 90% of its tokens already in circulation has little future dilution pressure. The investment risk is entirely different for a protocol with only 20% circulating supply facing a large unlock in three months.

Similarly, high revenue looks less impressive if the protocol distributes more in token incentives than it earns from users. DefiLlama tracks this through the "Earnings" metric, which deducts incentive costs from revenue. For example, a protocol might generate $10 million in annual revenue but distribute $15 million in token rewards.

While incentives are an effective strategy for early-stage protocol growth and are often necessary at the beginning of a protocol's lifecycle, they do create sell pressure that needs to be offset by other demand.

Learn More

This article outlines the most common DeFi metrics you'll encounter, but this is just the tip of the iceberg; there's much more to explore by diving deeper.

I've published a full DefiLlama tutorial on YouTube, detailing how to use the platform: screening for undervalued protocols, evaluating blockchains, discovering emerging projects, and avoiding common analytical mistakes. You can watch it by clicking here (link placeholder, original Chinese text had "点击这里观看").

If you want to continuously receive guides on DeFi analysis, portfolio construction, and on-chain research, I regularly post content on my Substack. Welcome to visit newsletter.dynamodefi.com.

The data is right in front of you; the key is whether you will put it to good use.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the core DeFi metrics discussed in the article for evaluating projects, and why are they important?

AThe core DeFi metrics discussed are TVL (Total Value Locked), Fees/Revenue/Holder's Revenue, Trading Volume, Open Interest, Stablecoin Market Cap, and App Revenue/Fees. They are important because they provide real-time, transparent financial data that allows for fundamental analysis of protocols, helping investors identify sustainable value creation and trends before market narratives fully form, unlike traditional finance which relies on delayed quarterly reports.

QHow does TVL (Total Value Locked) function as a metric in DeFi, and what are its main limitations?

ATVL measures the total value of assets deposited in a protocol's smart contracts, similar to Assets Under Management (AUM) in TradFi. It indicates user trust and the scale of a protocol. However, its main limitations are that it does not measure activity (a protocol can have high TVL but low fees) and it is highly correlated with token prices, meaning it can decrease due to market downturns even without actual withdrawals.

QWhat is the key difference between 'Fees', 'Revenue', and 'Holder's Revenue' in DeFi accounting?

AFees represent the total amount users pay to use a protocol (gross revenue). Revenue is the portion of fees the protocol actually retains (gross income). Holder's Revenue is a narrower metric that tracks the portion of revenue distributed to token holders through mechanisms like buybacks, burns, or staking rewards, similar to dividends and stock buybacks in traditional finance.

QAccording to the author, what is the three-step analytical framework for effectively interpreting DeFi metrics?

AThe three-step framework is: 1. Prioritize consistent, steady growth over short-term spikes. 2. Track both stock metrics (like TVL, Open Interest) and flow metrics (like Fees, Volume) together to get a complete picture of growth and avoid being misled by manipulated activity. 3. Consider the impact of token unlocks and incentives, as they create sell pressure and can distort the true economic health of a protocol.

QWhy is Stablecoin Market Cap on a blockchain considered a crucial metric for measuring capital flows?

AStablecoin Market Cap on a blockchain measures the total value of all stablecoins deployed on that chain. It is a crucial metric for capital flows because, unlike TVL which is affected by volatile asset prices, stablecoins represent real dollars (or dollar equivalents) that users have bridged onto the chain. An increase indicates genuine capital inflow into the ecosystem, while a decrease signals capital outflow, acting like capital movement in a national economy.

İlgili Okumalar

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit5 dk önce

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit5 dk önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 saat önce

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片