Trust Wallet Reveals Number of Victims from the Hack and the Compensation Problem

RBK-crypto2025-12-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Trust Wallet CEO Eowyn Chen revealed that last week's hack affected over 2,500 user accounts. However, the service has received approximately 5,000 compensation claims, indicating a significant number of fraudulent or duplicate requests, which is slowing down the payout process. The hack occurred on the night of December 26 due to a vulnerability in the browser extension version 2.68. An update (v2.69) was released, and the company promised to cover the estimated $7 million in losses. The verification of claims is being conducted alongside the technical investigation, prioritizing accuracy over speed. Trust Wallet is working with Google to obtain Chrome audit logs and is conducting a detailed security check on remote devices. In a related context, a recent Chainalysis report noted that 2025 has seen over 158,000 personal wallet compromises, resulting in $713 million in losses.

Trust Wallet head Eowyn Chen reported that last week's crypto wallet hack affected over 2,500 accounts. However, she stated that the service received twice as many compensation claims, which is slowing down payouts as it takes time to weed out fraudulent requests.

The Trust Wallet hack occurred on the night of December 26. Developers had previously acknowledged a vulnerability in the browser wallet version 2.68, released an update to version 2.69, and promised to compensate for the damage, which they estimated at $7 million.

"To date, we have identified 2,596 addresses affected by the hack. From this group, we have received about 5,000 claims, indicating a significant number of false or duplicate attempts to access victim compensation," wrote Chen.

The verification of claims is being conducted in parallel with the technical investigation of the incident. Chen noted that this has proven to be a complex task, so processing the requests is taking longer than affected users expected. The priority remains the accurate verification of wallet owners, not speed.

The day before, Chen reported that Google is assisting in the investigation—the crypto wallet team hopes to obtain audit logs (access request logs) from the Chrome browser. Also, the Trust Wallet security service will conduct a detailed check of the devices of employees working remotely.

A week earlier, Chainalysis estimated that the total damage from hackers' actions in 2025 exceeded $3.4 billion. This year, 158,000 cases of personal wallet compromises were recorded with a total damage of $713 million (compared to $1.5 billion the previous year), affecting over 80,000 users.

Bitcoin's price updated its weekly high. What happened to cryptocurrencies

Memecoin market cap plunged by $100 billion in 2025. CoinGecko report

"Overcoming the psychological barrier." What will happen to Bitcoin this week

İlgili Sorular

QHow many user accounts were affected by the Trust Wallet hack according to CEO Eowyn Chen?

AOver 2,500 accounts were affected by the Trust Wallet hack.

QWhat was the estimated financial damage from the Trust Wallet security breach?

AThe estimated financial damage from the hack was $7 million.

QWhy is the compensation process taking longer than expected for Trust Wallet users?

AThe process is taking longer because the service received about 5,000 claims for 2,596 affected addresses, indicating a significant number of fraudulent or duplicate claims that require time to filter out.

QWhich specific version of the Trust Wallet browser extension contained the vulnerability that was exploited?

AThe vulnerability was in the browser wallet version 2.68.

QWhat is the total estimated damage from hacker activities in 2025, as reported by Chainalysis?

AAccording to Chainalysis, the cumulative damage from hacker activities in 2025 exceeded $3.4 billion.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Reclaims Key MVRV Support At $73.7K — What Comes Next?

Bitcoin has reclaimed the critical MVRV support level at $73,700, a key indicator for market valuation. Holding above this level suggests potential upward momentum toward the mean MVRV target of $96,000. However, a breakdown below $73,700 could lead to a decline toward the Realized Price support near $55,000. The MVRV bands outline further resistance at $118,000 and extreme overvaluation at $140,000, while deeper support lies around $51,500. Currently trading near $78,000, Bitcoin remains 38% below its all-time high of $126,198 from October 2025.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Bitcoin Reclaims Key MVRV Support At $73.7K — What Comes Next?

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Historical Data Shows Bitcoin Price Has Never Breached This Level – Will It Start Now?

Historical data reveals a consistent pattern in Bitcoin's price action: after recovering 30% from a cycle low, it has never retested that bottom. This has held true across six major cycles since 2011. The current cycle, which saw a low near $61,300 in February, is approaching this critical threshold at approximately $79,694. Bitcoin has already up about 28% and needs just a 2.7% increase to breach this historically significant level. Supporting this bullish signal, exchange reserves have hit new lows, and large investors have accumulated the most BTC in a month since 2013.

bitcoinist5 saat önce

Historical Data Shows Bitcoin Price Has Never Breached This Level – Will It Start Now?

bitcoinist5 saat önce

Why Bitcoin Still Acts Like A Risk Asset Despite Safe-Haven Claims

Bitcoin possesses inherent qualities of a safe-haven asset, such as being portable and censorship-resistant. However, it continues to trade like a risk asset, correlating with indices like the NASDAQ during periods of uncertainty. Analysts attribute this to its lack of widespread acceptance by large capital pools, a process that may take another decade. Currently, Bitcoin is showing technical weakness with a bearish market structure shift and a rejection from a monthly fair value gap, suggesting a higher probability of a breakdown and a potential move lower. The broader downside thesis remains intact unless BTC breaks out of its current pattern with strength.

bitcoinist5 saat önce

Why Bitcoin Still Acts Like A Risk Asset Despite Safe-Haven Claims

bitcoinist5 saat önce

Eight Years of Entrepreneurship Notes from a16z's AI Partner

An early generative AI entrepreneur reflects on his 8-year journey building Rosebud AI, founded in 2018—a time when the field was still called “synthetic media.” Initially experimenting with models like CycleGAN and StyleGAN, he believed AI could make creation as intuitive as playing a game. Over the years, his team launched multiple products, including the viral app TokkingHeads, which gained 2 million users, learning to design around imperfect model outputs to deliver “good enough” user experiences. The evolution from niche synthetic media to general-purpose AI infrastructure—especially after GPT-4’s release—reshaped product possibilities. Code generation matured enough by 2023 to enable text-to-game prototyping. The author emphasizes that the real differentiator now isn’t just model capability but product design, distribution, and business model innovation. Having stepped down as CEO of Rosebud AI, he joins a16z as a partner focused on investing in the frontier model stack—models, infrastructure, and tools. He remains optimistic about AI-driven progress in creative tools, coding, and scientific domains. The piece concludes with a forward-looking note: the next phase of AI will be less about what’s possible and more about how capabilities are productized and scaled in the real world.

marsbit7 saat önce

Eight Years of Entrepreneurship Notes from a16z's AI Partner

marsbit7 saat önce

How Many Tokens Away Is Yang Zhilin from the 'Moon Chasing the Light'?

The article explores the intense competition between two leading Chinese AI companies, DeepSeek and Kimi (Moon Dark Side), and the mounting pressure on Yang Zhilin, the founder of Kimi. While DeepSeek re-emerged after 15 months of silence with its powerful V4 model—boasting 1.6 trillion parameters and low-cost, long-context capabilities—Kimi has been focusing on long-context processing and multi-agent systems with its K2.6 model. Yang faces a threefold challenge: technological rivalry, commercialization pressure, and investor expectations. Despite Kimi’s high valuation (reaching $18 billion), its revenue heavily relies on a single product with low paid conversion rates, while DeepSeek’s strategic silence and open-source influence have strengthened its market position and valuation prospects, now targeting over $20 billion. Both companies reflect broader trends in China’s AI ecosystem: Kimi aims for global influence through open-source contributions and agent-based advancements, while DeepSeek prioritizes foundational innovation and hardware independence, notably shifting to Huawei’s chips. Their competition is seen as vital for China’s AI progress, with the gap between top Chinese and U.S. models narrowing to just 2.7% on the Elo rating scale. Ultimately, the article argues that this rivalry, though anxiety-inducing for leaders like Zhilin, is essential for driving innovation and solidifying China’s role in the global AI landscape.

marsbit8 saat önce

How Many Tokens Away Is Yang Zhilin from the 'Moon Chasing the Light'?

marsbit8 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures