Trump Tweets After Hours, Pushing On-Chain Perpetual Contracts into the Mainstream

marsbit2026-03-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Trump, who calls himself the "Crypto President," is also driving the adoption of perpetual futures contracts. He frequently makes market-moving statements outside traditional trading hours, coinciding with the rise of 24/7 trading infrastructure. Over a single weekend, Hyperliquid’s S&P 500 proxy product experienced three major price swings triggered by Trump’s tweets—first rising on positive remarks, then falling after a threat against Iran, and surging again following claims of diplomatic progress (later denied by Iran). This highlights a structural shift toward perpetual contracts and round-the-clock markets. Perpetual DEX trading volume reached $739 billion in January 2026, accounting for 10.2% of all crypto perpetual trading—up from just 2.0% two years prior. While it remains uncertain whether perps will dominate traditional finance, growth is undeniable. Recent developments, like Katana’s acquisition of IDEX and the launch of Katana Perps, signal increasing momentum. Regulatory clarity and macro risks are accelerating the move toward 24/7 trading, where price discovery happens continuously.

Author: FintechFrank

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: This article captures an ongoing structural shift: Trump's habit of making market-moving statements after the market closes, which coincides with the rise of 24/7 trading infrastructure. The S&P 500 proxy product on Hyperliquid experienced three significant fluctuations triggered by Trump's tweets over the same weekend. This is not a coincidence but a preview of a new normal.

Full Text Below:

Trump calls himself the "Crypto President," but in many ways, he is also the "Perpetual Contracts President."

It is well-known that Trump doesn't sleep, and he doesn't hesitate to make statements that can shake the market outside of traditional trading hours. This is a peculiar yet fitting backdrop: the market is evolving toward 24/7 trading, and we happen to have a president who can best be described as "spontaneous and sometimes chaotic."

This dynamic was fully demonstrated over the weekend.

Just days after S&P Global announced it would authorize trading of the S&P 500 on Hyperliquid, Trump stated on Friday afternoon after the market closed that the U.S. is "very close to achieving our goals." The S&P 500 proxy product on Hyperliquid immediately rose.

Then, on Saturday at 7:44 PM Eastern Time, Trump escalated his threats, warning that he would strike Iran's power facilities if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened. The reaction was instantaneous: the S&P 500 on Hyperliquid immediately fell.

But it didn't end there. On Monday morning, Trump claimed that the U.S. and Iran had held talks on a "comprehensive and thorough resolution of hostilities." S&P 500 futures surged by over 3.5%. Iran later denied Trump's statement.

Trump's presidency may not be driving the arrival of 24/7 markets, but it has made it impossible to ignore the issue.

It remains unclear which perpetual contract product will dominate or whether perpetual contracts will become the primary structure for 24/7 markets. Futures have historically been far less familiar to U.S. retail investors than options, and whether traditional brokerages can successfully promote these products to their customer base remains an open question. I am skeptical. What works in crypto markets may not seamlessly translate to traditional finance users.

Nevertheless, growth is undeniable.

The open interest on perpetual contract DEX platforms has surged significantly. In January 2026, the trading volume of perpetual contract DEXs reached $739 billion, accounting for 10.2% of the total crypto perpetual contract trading volume on decentralized platforms—compared to just 2.0% two years ago.

As Carlos Guzman and Slater Santer of GSR Research show in the chart, news flow in both centralized and decentralized perpetual contract markets has accelerated since the HYPE TGE:

This morning, there was further momentum within the GSR ecosystem:

Katana acquired the early decentralized exchange IDEX and launched Katana Perps, a platform designed to unify spot and derivatives trading on-chain. This is the first major move by CEO Matthew Fisher since taking office, reflecting a pursuit of controlling more of the trading stack and capturing greater economic value.

This move also highlights a broader shift: the environment for perpetual contracts is becoming increasingly favorable. Here’s how Katana put it:

"This move coincides with U.S. regulators sending clear signals allowing crypto perpetual contracts, marking a potential inflection point for on-chain derivatives. At the same time, trading activity continues to migrate toward 24/7 markets, with price discovery increasingly happening in real-time rather than during fixed trading hours. As global markets adapt to new realities, macro risks no longer wait for trading hours, reinforcing the importance of a continuous 24/7 trading environment."

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding Trump and the financial markets?

AThe article argues that former President Trump, through his habit of making market-moving statements after traditional trading hours, is inadvertently accelerating the adoption and mainstream relevance of 24/7 on-chain perpetual contracts, making him a 'Perpetuals President'.

QWhich platform's S&P 500 proxy product is highlighted as reacting to Trump's tweets?

AThe S&P 500 proxy product on the Hyperliquid platform is highlighted, as it experienced significant price movements in response to a series of Trump's tweets over a single weekend.

QWhat significant change in market share for perpetual DEXs does the article mention?

AThe article states that perpetual DEX trading reached $739 billion in January 2026, accounting for 10.2% of all crypto perpetual trading volume, a significant increase from just 2.0% two years prior.

QWhat recent corporate acquisition and product launch is cited as evidence of growing momentum in the on-chain derivatives space?

AKatana acquired the early decentralized exchange IDEX and launched 'Katana Perps', a platform aiming to unify spot and derivatives trading on-chain.

QAccording to the article, what broader shift in trading is being reinforced by global macro events?

AThe article states that trading activity is shifting towards 24/7 markets, with price discovery happening increasingly in real-time, a trend reinforced by the fact that global macro risks no longer wait for traditional market hours.

İlgili Okumalar

The Bitcoin 4-Year Cycle Has Never Disappeared, It Just 'Changed Shape'

Has Bitcoin's 4-Year Cycle Disappeared? The article argues that the fundamental 4-year cycle driven by halving events remains intact but its manifestation has changed due to a shift in the dominant buyer profile. The cycle peaked in October 2025, aligning with historical post-halving timelines. However, classic on-chain top indicators (MVRV, Pi Cycle, NUPL, etc.) failed to signal the peak. This is because these metrics are designed to detect retail FOMO, which was largely absent in Bitcoin this cycle. Retail capital was systematically drained by memecoins and high-FDV, low-float VC token launches before it could fuel a parabolic Bitcoin finale. Instead, institutional buyers (spot Bitcoin ETFs, corporate treasuries like MicroStrategy) became the marginal buyers. Their steady, programmatic accumulation created a strong but less volatile uptrend that didn't trigger traditional euphoria signals. The cycle's structure persists: a post-halving supply shock, a peak roughly 480-550 days later, and a bottom approximately one year after the peak (projected for Q3/Q4 2026). Bear market drawdowns are becoming shallower (projected 50-65% vs. past 78-86%) as institutional ownership matures. The article concludes that the cycle's timing remains the most reliable signal, while the tools to identify its phases must evolve with the market's structure.

marsbit6 dk önce

The Bitcoin 4-Year Cycle Has Never Disappeared, It Just 'Changed Shape'

marsbit6 dk önce

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit22 dk önce

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit22 dk önce

Saylor Bought 1,550 BTC, But This Might Be Strategy's Worst Trade Recently

Saylor purchased 1,550 BTC, but this may be one of MicroStrategy's worst recent trades for its MSTR shareholders. The article explains that for MSTR to increase its Bitcoin-per-share (BPS) metric, it must issue new shares at an mNAV (market cap to net asset value) ratio above a "breakeven" level, calculated here as 1.30. In this transaction, MSTR raised $181 million via an ATM offering and used only $101.3 million to buy Bitcoin, with the rest reportedly added to its dollar reserves. Crucially, the author argues the shares were likely sold below the 1.30 mNAV threshold. This combination—selling below breakeven mNAV and not deploying all proceeds into Bitcoin—resulted in a slight dilution of BPS, estimated at a 0.19% decrease. The trade is framed as a sacrifice of MSTR shareholder value (BPS) to extend the dollar reserve runway for its Sustainable Treasury Reserve Coin (STRC) subsidiary from 6.3 to 7 months. The author concludes that Strategy is gambling that this move will improve market sentiment for STRC and MSTR, allowing future value-accretive fundraising. If it fails, the company may face the difficult choice of further diluting MSTR or delaying STRC dividends.

marsbit26 dk önce

Saylor Bought 1,550 BTC, But This Might Be Strategy's Worst Trade Recently

marsbit26 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

**Title: Saylor's Purchase of 1,550 Bitcoins Was a Bad Trade** The article critically analyzes Strategy's recent move of selling 32 bitcoins followed by a much larger purchase of 1,550 bitcoins. While appearing bullish, the author argues this trade is detrimental to MSTR shareholders. The core argument revolves around the concept of "breakeven modified Net Asset Value (mNAV)," a key metric for Strategy. To increase Bitcoin per share (BPS) for MSTR holders, Strategy must issue new shares at a premium high enough that the funds raised can buy more bitcoin than the bitcoin backing each existing share. Currently, this breakeven mNAV is estimated at 1.30. The recent trade failed on two counts: 1. The shares for the $181 million raise were issued at an mNAV *below* the 1.30 breakeven point. Selling "cheap" shares to buy bitcoin actually *reduces* BPS. 2. Only $101.3 million of the raised funds were used to buy bitcoin; the rest went to boost the company's dollar reserves. The breakeven mNAV calculation assumes *100%* of proceeds are used for bitcoin purchases. Diverting funds, even if mNAV were high, dilutes BPS. The result is an estimated 0.19% decrease in Bitcoin per share for MSTR holders. In exchange, Strategy merely extended its operational runway for its dollar reserves from ~6.3 months to 7 months. The author interprets this as Strategy prioritizing the survival and development of its STRC business over its stated core goal of increasing MSTR's BPS. This constitutes a gamble: if sacrificing MSTR value leads to improved market sentiment and a recovery in STRC's price (and thus mNAV), the whole system could work. If not, Strategy may be forced into a cycle of further diluting MSTR to stay afloat, potentially leading to deferred STRC dividends or corporate decline. The article concludes with a hope for price recovery for Bitcoin, MSTR, and STRC.

Foresight News33 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

Foresight News33 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

After a severe two-day selloff in early June that erased over $1 trillion from U.S. chip stock market value, capital is flowing back first to the memory sector. The correction was not driven by a collapse in AI demand but rather a market reassessment of high expectations. Stocks like Broadcom faced selling pressure despite strong AI revenue guidance, signaling a shift in focus from who has an "AI story" to who can most rapidly translate AI demand into verifiable profits and earnings per share (EPS). Memory companies, such as Micron and SK Hynix, are leading the recovery because their EPS growth is more immediately verifiable. The AI server boom directly increases demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity server DRAM, tightening supply and driving up contract prices for conventional DRAM and NAND Flash. This price increase, coupled with a shift to higher-margin products, flows directly into near-term revenue and profitability, as evidenced in recent earnings reports. In contrast, other AI semiconductor segments like GPUs, ASICs, and optical modules, while central to the long-term AI infrastructure story, face longer and less certain paths to EPS validation. Their growth depends more on future product cycles, customer adoption timelines, and capital expenditure plans. The rebound in memory stocks highlights a market preference for assets with shorter, more transparent EPS conversion cycles following the recent de-risking phase. However, this does not negate the potential of other AI hardware segments should they provide clearer near-term order visibility. The episode has raised the validation bar for all AI-related investments.

marsbit33 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

marsbit33 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures