TROVE token’s 97% wipeout: From $11.5 mln presale to rug-pull accusations

ambcrypto2026-01-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Trove Market's TROVE token experienced a catastrophic 97.5% crash shortly after its launch on January 20, falling from a fully diluted valuation of $20 million to just $500,000. The project had previously raised $11.5 million in a presale but faced immediate backlash after announcing a switch from Hyperliquid to Solana, breaching investor trust. Accusations of a rug pull intensified when it was revealed that funds were allegedly funneled to influencers, casinos, and betting platforms. A key liquidity provider liquidated $12.9 million worth of assets, further destabilizing the project. Most presale investors suffered massive losses, with sentiment remaining extremely bearish and fears of further price declines.

On the 20th of January, the crypto market was stunned when Trove Market launched its native token, TROVE.

Prior to the launch, Trove Market had faced community backlash after the team announced it would abandon the Hyperliquid LI blockchain.

This was a massive breach of its social contracts with investors after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, setting the ground for a rough launch.

Trove market accused of rug pull

The TROVE token launched on Trove’s Perp DEX, with a fully diluted valuation of $20 million. Shortly after launch, the token’s FVD plummeted 97.5% to $500k, then rose slightly to $722.8k at press time.

At the same time, its market cap dropped from $612k to $512k, a loss of nearly $100k, indicating capital outflows.

Soon after the TROVE token went live, it dumped 28% in minutes from $0.0006 to $0.00043 before attempting a recovery.

Since then, the altcoin price rose to $0.00078 before slightly retracing to $0.00072, marking an 18% rise on the daily timeframe.

Reasons why TROVE was doomed to fail

In preparation for the token launch, developers ran an ICO on Hyperliquid. The team managed to surpass its $2.5 million target and raised over $11.5 million.

After raising these funds, the team announced it will keep $9.3 million to build its Solana-based Perp DEX. The move was perceived as the first red flag, and the team faced fierce community backlash.

Even worse, the community accused Trove Market of paying KOLs for promotion, with funds flowing to entertainment addresses.

According to Hyperliquid Daily, waleswoosh alone pocketed $8K for pumping and promoting the token. ZachXBT dug up receipts showing ICO money funneled straight to casinos and Polymarket bets.

The last nail in the coffin was driven by the alleged liquidity provider. Days ago, a key liquidity partner lost confidence in the project and liquidated 500k HYPE worth approximately $12.9 million.

The decision to sell these Hype tokens effectively pulled the rug from under Trove’s operational requirements, forcing the team to seek support elsewhere.

With these factors combined, the TROVE token sat as a ticking time bomb, and the launch validated the community’s fears.

Will TROVE see more losses?

TROVE plummeted as negative sentiment had taken hold even before the token launch. As such, earlier buyers rushed to dump, fearing making more losses.

Despite that, most of the presale buyers recorded massive losses. For instance, an earlier buyer argued that his $20k investment should have resulted in $14k in USDC and $6k in TROVE.

However, the buyers received $600, blaming the token’s GIGA nuking. With market sentiment even more bearish, TROVE is at risk of further losses.

If current sentiment persists, the token will plummet to $0.0004. However, if the team can manage to restore community confidence, $0.001 is within reach.

Final Thoughts

Trove Market is accused of a rug pull, following a contentious launch of the TROVE token on Solana Perp DEX.
TROVE FVD dropped 97.5% from $20 million to $500k, warning of liquidity exit.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the TROVE token at launch and what did it drop to shortly after?

AThe TROVE token launched with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $20 million. Shortly after launch, its FDV plummeted 97.5% to $500,000.

QWhat was the first major 'red flag' that caused community backlash against Trove Market before the token launch?

AThe first major red flag was the team's announcement that they would abandon the Hyperliquid blockchain after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, which was seen as a massive breach of its social contracts with investors.

QAccording to the article, how did blockchain investigator ZachXBT claim the ICO funds were being misused?

AZachXBT provided receipts showing that ICO money was funneled directly to casinos and bets on Polymarket.

QWhat specific action by a key liquidity partner was described as 'the last nail in the coffin' for the TROVE project?

AA key liquidity partner lost confidence and liquidated 500k HYPE tokens worth approximately $12.9 million, which pulled the rug from under Trove's operational requirements.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned for the TROVE token, depending on market sentiment and team action?

AIf the current bearish sentiment persists, the token could plummet to $0.0004. If the team manages to restore community confidence, the price could rise to $0.001.

İlgili Okumalar

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手38 dk önce

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手38 dk önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit45 dk önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit45 dk önce

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs reports a governance exploit against the Token of Power protocol, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.58 million in WETH. The attacker exploited a missing timelock in the protocol's Aragon DAO setup, allowing them to propose, vote on, and execute a malicious action within a single block. The attacker funded the operation with 662 ETH from Tornado Cash, purchased enough TOP tokens to gain majority voting power, minted 10 billion new TOP tokens, and swapped them for WETH via a Balancer pool before moving funds back through Tornado Cash. The incident underscores that governance design is a critical security risk in DeFi, where parameters like timelocks provide essential reaction time. It also highlights how mixers and liquidity pools can be utilized in exploits without being directly compromised. Observers are now watching for any movement of the stolen funds and further remediation details from involved parties. This event is part of a broader shift in crypto, emphasizing the importance of underlying infrastructure, security, and governance alongside market movements.

bitcoinist3 saat önce

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

bitcoinist3 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5 saat önce

Ripple Launches XRPL AI Starter Kit For XRP And RLUSD Agent Payments

Ripple has released the XRPL AI Starter Kit, a Phase 1 developer toolkit aimed at enabling AI agents to make payments using XRP and its stablecoin RLUSD on the XRP Ledger. The kit supports the x402 payment standard and includes a server to connect AI systems like Claude directly to XRPL documentation. This move provides XRP with a new utility narrative focused on autonomous, machine-to-machine transactions, where agents could pay for APIs and services without manual approval for each micro-payment. For the XRP community, it represents a push into tangible payment infrastructure beyond speculation. The announcement is a concrete product update within a broader crypto shift towards valuing infrastructure and utility alongside price. The next steps involve monitoring developer adoption, documentation updates, and testnet activity. The story is based on Ripple's official blog.

bitcoinist7 saat önce

Ripple Launches XRPL AI Starter Kit For XRP And RLUSD Agent Payments

bitcoinist7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures