Top Equipment for Mining by Profitability. July Results

cryptonews.ru2026-08-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Top Mining Equipment by Profitability: July Results In July, Bitcoin mining profitability was shaped by reduced network difficulty, a rise in Hashprice (revenue per unit of computing power), and a stabilization of BTC's price after a prolonged decline, according to a monthly report. The average Bitcoin price for the month was $63,931.98. Two consecutive downward adjustments in network difficulty improved mining conditions, with the metric falling by 5% on July 11 and another 0.74% on July 25. Concurrently, the Hashprice increased by roughly 15.69%, reaching $31.93 per 1 PH/s per day by month's end. The report notes the current decline in network difficulty relative to a year ago is a rare event, last seen in 2021 after China's mining ban, and is now driven by a complex mix of factors including a lower BTC price, shifts in investment toward AI, and regional power constraints. The most profitable air-cooled ASIC miner tested was the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s, maintaining its lead from the first half of 2026. The top three models were: 1. Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s: 1.12% monthly return. 2. Bitmain Antminer S21 PRO 234 TH/s MIX: 0.38% monthly return. 3. MicroBT Whatsminer M70 222 TH/s: 0.24% monthly return. The monthly BTC yield among the seven tested models ranged from approximately 0.00289476 to 0.0038313 BTC.

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

What affected mining profitability

In July, the mining economy was shaped by a decrease in Bitcoin network difficulty, an increase in profitability per unit of hashrate (Hashprice), and stabilization of the leading cryptocurrency's rate after a prolonged decline, according to the monthly equipment profitability report from data center operator Intelion. Two consecutive network difficulty reductions during the month improved mining conditions.

The average Bitcoin rate in July was $63,931.98, increasing by $752.45 compared to June. Despite relatively low trading activity persisting during the summer period, the rate stabilized after a prolonged decline.

In July, two consecutive recalculations of the Bitcoin network difficulty occurred downwards: on July 11, the indicator decreased by 5%, and on July 25 — by another 0.74%. As a result, the network difficulty by the end of the month was 126.23 T (trillion).

Mining difficulty is automatically recalculated approximately every two weeks to keep the emission of new bitcoins on schedule: preventing it from increasing when miners boost activity, and vice versa.

The July dynamics reflect the adaptation of the network's aggregate computational power to changed market conditions. A decrease in difficulty increases the volume of $BTC that can be mined with unchanged computational power of the equipment.

Simultaneously with the decrease in network difficulty in July, Hashprice grew — an indicator of miners' potential revenue per unit of computational power. Between June 30 and July 31, Hashprice increased from $27.60 to $31.93 per 1 PH/s per day, which corresponds to an increase of approximately 15.69%.

The report notes that a feature of the current period was the decrease in network difficulty relative to the level of a year ago. Citing data from Hashrate Index, analysts pointed out that such a situation has been observed only for the second time in Bitcoin's entire history. The previous case occurred in 2021 after the mining ban in China and the large-scale shutdown of computing power.

In 2026, the dynamics are more complex. This is attributed to a combination of factors, including changes in the mining economy against the backdrop of a decrease in the Bitcoin rate and Hashprice relative to peak values, the redistribution of part of investments and energy infrastructure in favor of AI projects, as well as the temporary shutdown of part of the computing power and regional energy restrictions.

Profitability Leaders

The highest efficiency among the tested air-cooled ASIC miners was again shown by the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s. This model retained its leadership based on the results of the first half of 2026. Top 3:

Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s

Profitability — 1.12% per month / 13.42% annually
Mined — 0.0038313 $BTC

Bitmain Antminer S21 PRO 234 TH/s MIX

Profitability — 0.38% per month / 4.56% annually
Mined — 0.00332046 $BTC

MicroBT Whatsminer M70 222 TH/s

Profitability — 0.24% per month / 2.92% annually
Mined — 0.00315018 $BTC

A total of seven equipment models were tested. The range of $BTC mined among them was 0.00289476–0.0038313 $BTC per month. Profitability indicators were calculated based on the average $BTC/USD and USD/RUB rates in July.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the main factors that influenced Bitcoin mining profitability in July, according to the article?

AThe main factors were a decrease in Bitcoin network difficulty (two consecutive reductions totaling around 5.74%), an increase in Hashprice (growing about 15.69% to $31.93 per 1 PH/s per day), and the stabilization of Bitcoin's price after a prolonged decline, with an average price of $63,931.98.

QWhich ASIC miner model for air cooling was reported as the most profitable in July?

AThe Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s was the most profitable air-cooled ASIC miner in July, maintaining its leadership from the first half of 2026.

QWhat was the monthly and annualized profitability percentage for the top-performing miner, the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP?

AThe Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s had a monthly profitability of 1.12% and an annualized profitability of 13.42%.

QHow does the article describe the current reduction in Bitcoin network difficulty compared to historical trends?

AThe article states that the current reduction in network difficulty relative to levels a year ago is only the second such occurrence in Bitcoin's entire history. The previous similar event happened in 2021 following the mining ban in China.

QWhat range of Bitcoin was mined per month by the seven tested ASIC miner models?

AThe monthly Bitcoin production among the seven tested models ranged from 0.00289476 BTC to 0.0038313 BTC.

İlgili Okumalar

After Changxin, Yushu Takes the Lead: The Value and Weight of the First Humanoid Robot Stock

On August 19, 2026, Unitree Robotics (688836.SH), known as China's "first humanoid robotics stock," officially listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's STAR Market. The stock opened at 1,100 yuan, a surge of 629.44% from its 150.80 yuan IPO price, with its market capitalization briefly reaching 445 billion yuan. This highlights intense market enthusiasm for the humanoid robot sector. The IPO was characterized by high demand and low circulation, with only 7.44% of shares initially tradable. This scarcity, coupled with strong investor interest (record-high participation and a low 0.0181% lottery win rate), contributed to the dramatic price surge. Founder Wang Xingxing, holding over 31% of shares, saw his wealth exceed 110 billion yuan, making him China's wealthiest "post-90s" entrepreneur. Major institutional backers like Meituan, DeepSeek, Tencent, and Sequoia China also reaped substantial gains. Key to the valuation is Unitree's status as a profitable company in a field where many competitors are not. In 2025, it achieved 600 million yuan in adjusted net profit and delivered over 5,500 humanoid robots, ranking first globally in shipments. However, over 70% of its humanoid revenue still comes from R&D and education, with industrial applications accounting for only about 9%, indicating early-stage commercialization. The company faces competition from global players like Figure AI (est. $39-40B valuation), Boston Dynamics, and Tesla's Optimus, as well as domestic rivals like Zhiyuan and Ubtech. To become the "global humanoid robotics leader," its market cap would need to exceed 500 billion yuan. Market opinions on its future are divided: optimists cite its profitability, leading shipments, and strategic tie-up with DeepSeek; the cautious point to high valuations and unproven mass-market adoption; a neutral view expects a post-surge consolidation into an "earnings verification phase." Risks include high valuation digestion pressure, slower-than-expected commercialization in industrial/household settings, potential US FCC regulatory impacts on new models, intense competition, rapid technological iteration, and short-term stock volatility. The IPO marks a significant milestone, but Unitree's path to becoming a global leader remains challenging.

Odaily星球日报14 dk önce

After Changxin, Yushu Takes the Lead: The Value and Weight of the First Humanoid Robot Stock

Odaily星球日报14 dk önce

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

The US Department of Justice has reportedly launched an antitrust investigation into venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). The probe focuses on whether a16z's investment partners have improperly held board seats at competing artificial intelligence companies, specifically Databricks Inc. and Fivetran Inc. a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz sits on Databricks' board, while partner Martin Casado is a board member at Fivetran. Both companies are direct competitors in the business of collecting, organizing, and analyzing large-scale enterprise data. The investigation has run parallel to the DOJ's review of Fivetran's acquisition of a similar company, dbt Labs, which was completed last year and ultimately approved. A potential resolution could require the a16z partners to resign from one of the competing boards, a common remedy in similar cases during the Biden administration. The probe highlights the enforcement of a 1914 law against "interlocking directorates," where individuals or entities serve on the boards of rival firms. This case is notable as the alleged conflict involves multiple partners from the same firm, rather than a single individual. a16z, managing $90 billion in assets, is a major political donor and has significant influence in AI policy. The investigation's outcome remains uncertain, and the DOJ may ultimately take no action.

marsbit44 dk önce

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

marsbit44 dk önce

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit1 saat önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit1 saat önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片