TKF Report Highlights Uncollected TDS in India from Offshore VDA Trading

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A TKF Report titled "Taxation of Digital Assets in India" highlights significant uncollected TDS from offshore cryptocurrency exchange platforms, estimated at approximately ₹11,000 crore since July 2022. Of this, ₹4,877 crore pertains to the last year alone, indicating a major shift of Indian trading activity beyond the nation’s taxation framework. The Bharat Web3 Association shared the report, emphasizing that regulatory arbitrage and uneven enforcement are causing sustained revenue leakage. In contrast, the Indian government collected ₹158 crore in FY22-23, ₹180 crore in FY23-24, and around ₹450 crore in FY24-25 from domestic platforms. CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta previously suggested key policy changes, including reducing TDS to 0.01%, aligning capital gains tax with income slabs, and allowing loss offsetting to encourage onshore platform usage and ensure tax equity.

TKF Report, titled Taxation of Digital Assets in India, has highlighted that there is a significant amount of uncollected TDS from offshore exchange platforms. Bharat Web3 Association has further shed light by sharing the report with the community. Notably, this comes days after CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta listed three key changes that could help the country become a leader in the segment.

Key Points from TKF Report

According to the TKF Report, Taxation of Digital Assets in India, the uncollected TDS is approximately ₹11,000 crore. This is cumulative since July 2022 – that is when the tax was introduced for the crypto sphere in the country. Out of this amount, around ₹4,877 crore pertains to the last year alone.

Notably, the uncollected TDS mentioned is from offshore exchanges, which many community members have tagged as a possible revenue leak.

The government reportedly collected ₹158 crore in FY 22-23, within the first few months of the implementation of the tax. Tax collection increased to ₹180 crore in the next year, that is in FY 23-24. For FY 24-25, collections stood at around ₹450 crore as a result of global tailwind pushing the country’s crypto industry forward, according to the report.

Bharat Web3 Association Speaks

Bharat Web3 Association, an apex body for leading Web3 technology Indian companies, shared the report. It underlined that the uncollected TDS further indicates a major shift in Indian trading activity beyond the scope of the nation’s taxation and reporting framework.

The association further emphasized how regulatory arbitrage and uneven enforcement translated into sustained revenue leakage, a similar point later echoed by community members. Bharat Web3 Association has reinforced the need for a calibrated policy approach to make companies stronger, with a core focus on helping onshore platforms retain activities.

Sumit Gupta Suggests Key Changes

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta had earlier suggested three key changes to reset India’s crypto policy. He suggested a standardized TDS of 0.01% instead of 1%, adding that a lower compliance cost would bring more users back to regulated platforms, including onshore ventures.

Sumit then suggested aligning the capital tax of 30% with income slabs, explaining that the current flat rate violated tax equity. He highlighted that progressive taxation would encourage legitimate wealth creation and signal fairness principles. Finally, CoinDCX CEO suggested allowing loss offsetting for crypto investors against other income.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

World Liberty Financial Launches On-Chain Lending Market Built on Dolomite

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the estimated amount of uncollected TDS from offshore VDA trading platforms in India, as highlighted by the TKF Report?

AThe TKF Report estimates the uncollected TDS to be approximately ₹11,000 crore cumulatively since July 2022.

QWhich Indian association shared the TKF report and what key concern did it highlight regarding the uncollected TDS?

AThe Bharat Web3 Association shared the report. It highlighted that the uncollected TDS indicates a major shift of Indian trading activity to platforms beyond the nation's taxation and reporting framework, leading to sustained revenue leakage.

QWhat were the three key policy changes suggested by CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta for India's crypto sector?

ASumit Gupta suggested: 1. Reducing the TDS rate to a standardized 0.01% from 1%. 2. Aligning the capital gains tax with income slabs instead of a flat 30%. 3. Allowing investors to offset crypto losses against other income.

QHow much TDS did the Indian government collect in the fiscal year 2023-24 according to the report?

AThe Indian government collected ₹180 crore in TDS in the fiscal year 2023-24.

QSince when has the 1% TDS on crypto transactions been in effect in India, as mentioned in the article?

AThe 1% TDS on crypto transactions was introduced in July 2022.

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 saat önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 saat önce

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures